{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,10]],"date-time":"2026-04-10T20:56:41Z","timestamp":1775854601340,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Sociedad Argentina de Gastroenterologia","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,29]],"date-time":"2022-09-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1664409600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["ACTA"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Introducci\u00f3n. Las biopsias duodenales son cruciales para el diagn\u00f3stico correcto de m\u00faltiples patolog\u00edas. Por este motivo el pat\u00f3logo debe contar con la cantidad y la calidad adecuadas de tejido. A\u00fan no est\u00e1 claro cu\u00e1l es la mejor manera de obtenerlo al realizar una endoscop\u00eda.\nObjetivos. Este estudio busca comparar la calidad de las muestras duodenales obtenidas mediante dos protocolos de biopsia distintos.\nMateriales y m\u00e9todos. Cuatrocientos pacientes remitidos a una endoscopia alta con toma de biopsias duodenales por indicaciones varias fueron separados en dos grupos: \u00abmuestras m\u00faltiples\u00bb y \u00abmuestra individual\u00bb. Se excluyeron a los pacientes sin indicaci\u00f3n de biopsia duodenal.\n Resultados. Cuando se tomaron muestras m\u00faltiples, el 87% fue adecuado para el an\u00e1lisis histopatol\u00f3gico y cuando se tom\u00f3 una muestra, el 86,5% fue adecuado.\nConclusi\u00f3n. Nuestro estudio sugiere que tomar muestras m\u00faltiples (dos) o tomar s\u00f3lo una ofrece material de calidad similar apto para un diagn\u00f3stico histopatol\u00f3gico.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.52787\/agl.v52i3.213","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,30]],"date-time":"2022-09-30T12:52:25Z","timestamp":1664542345000},"page":"385-387","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Biopsias duodenales: \u00bftoma de muestra individual o de muestras m\u00faltiples?"],"prefix":"10.52787","volume":"52","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5025-6819","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Carlos A","family":"Rettally","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Milantia","family":"Roy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"30608","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,29]]},"container-title":["Acta Gastroenterol\u00f3gica Latinoamericana"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/actaojs.org.ar\/ojs\/index.php\/acta\/article\/download\/213\/512","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/actaojs.org.ar\/ojs\/index.php\/acta\/article\/download\/213\/543","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/actaojs.org.ar\/ojs\/index.php\/acta\/article\/download\/213\/543","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,30]],"date-time":"2022-09-30T12:52:26Z","timestamp":1664542346000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/actaojs.org.ar\/ojs\/index.php\/acta\/article\/view\/213"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,29]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,29]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.52787\/agl.v52i3.213","relation":{},"ISSN":["2469-1119"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2469-1119","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,29]]}}}