{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]],"date-time":"2026-08-19T19:30:54Z","timestamp":1787167854398,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Open Medical Publishing","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"abstract":"\n Background<\/jats:title>\n Pediatric upper extremity fractures are common and frequently require surgical intervention. Traditional fixation methods using metallic implants, such as Kirschner wires and elastic stable intramedullary nails, offer reliable mechanical stability but necessitate secondary procedures for hardware removal. Polymer-based resorbable implants offer an advantage by eliminating the need for secondary procedures for hardware removal while maintaining efficacy. This systematic review evaluates the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of resorbable compared to non-resorbable implants in pediatric patients.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria targeted studies comparing outcomes of resorbable versus non-resorbable implants in pediatric upper extremity fractures. Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI critical appraisal tools. Nine studies met inclusion criteria, comprising one randomized controlled trial and eight retrospective cohort studies.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n Nine studies including 391 pediatric patients were analyzed. The most common fractures involved the forearm (four studies), followed by lateral condyle (three studies) and medial epicondyle injuries (two studies). Mean patient age ranged from 5.6 to 11.6 years. Surgical site infections, skin irritation, postoperative pain, and nonunion were less common with resorbable implants with only one case requiring implant removal. Re-displacement was more frequent with resorbable implants but rarely required revision. Functional outcomes were comparable across groups.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n Resorbable implants are a safe and efficacious alternative to traditional metallic devices for pediatric upper extremity fractures. Their favorable complication profile and elimination of hardware removal procedures support wider clinical adoption. Further randomized trials are warranted.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.52965\/001c.166443","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]],"date-time":"2026-08-19T18:28:36Z","timestamp":1787164116000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Polymer-Based Resorbable vs Non-resorbable Implants for Pediatric Upper Extremity Fractures: A Systematic Review"],"prefix":"10.52965","volume":"18","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-3979-5118","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Kareem","family":"Elhigzi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/02nkdxk79","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}],"name":"Virginia Commonwealth University","department":["School of Medicine"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Konstantinos","family":"Oikonomou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/02nkdxk79","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}],"name":"Virginia Commonwealth University","department":["School of Medicine"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Benjamin","family":"Vanderkwaak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"virginia commonwealth university","department":["School of Medicine"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Benjamin","family":"Cassidy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/02nkdxk79","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}],"name":"Virginia Commonwealth University","department":["Department of Orthopedic Surgery"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthew","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"virginia commonwealth university","department":["Department of Orthopedic Surgery"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Omar","family":"Protzuk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/02nkdxk79","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}],"name":"Virginia Commonwealth University","department":["Department of Orthopedic Surgery"]},{"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/002pd6e78","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}],"name":"Massachusetts General Hospital","department":["Department of Orthopedic Surgery"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Cyrus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/02nkdxk79","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}],"name":"Virginia Commonwealth University","department":["Department of Orthopedic Surgery"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Victoria","family":"Kuester","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/02nkdxk79","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}],"name":"Virginia Commonwealth University","department":["Department of Orthopedic Surgery"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"30777","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]]},"reference":[{"issue":"14","key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4036","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13144036","article-title":"Pediatric diaphyseal forearm fracture management with biodegradable poly-L-lactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) intramedullary implants: a longitudinal study","volume":"13","author":"A. L\u0151rincz","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"995","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10050995","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of the clinical recovery and biodegradation of polylactide-co-glycolide implants used in the intramedullary nailing of children's forearm shaft fractures with at least four years of follow-up","volume":"10","author":"M. Perhomaa","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1591","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-008-0537-4","article-title":"Early experience with biodegradable implants in pediatric patients","volume":"467","author":"A. F. Mavrogenis","year":"2009","journal-title":"Clin Orthop"},{"issue":"8","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1097\/BPO.0000000000000576","article-title":"Bioabsorbable pin fixation in late presenting pediatric radial neck fractures","volume":"36","author":"C. B. Fuller","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Pediatr Orthop"},{"issue":"12","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1129","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20141124-91","article-title":"Foreign body reaction after PLC reconstruction caused by a broken PLLA screw","volume":"37","author":"T.K. Kim","year":"2014","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"n160","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n160","article-title":"PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"M. J. Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref7","series-title":"JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.46658\/JBIRM-17-06","article-title":"Chapter 7: Systematic Reviews of Etiology and Risk","author":"S. Moola","year":"2020"},{"issue":"8","key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"942","DOI":"10.3390\/children11080942","article-title":"Comparison of titanium versus resorbable intramedullary nailing in pediatric forearm fractures","volume":"11","author":"\u00c1. L. D\u00e1vid","year":"2024","journal-title":"Children"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-022-05305-w","article-title":"Bioresorbable implants vs. Kirschner-wires in the treatment of severely displaced distal paediatric radius and forearm fractures\u2014a retrospective multicentre study","volume":"23","author":"M. Varga","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.biomaterials.2018.09.011","article-title":"Intramedullary nailing of forearm shaft fractures by biodegradable compared with titanium nails: results of a prospective randomized trial in children with at least two years of follow-up","volume":"185","author":"L. Korhonen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Biomaterials"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mpsur.2016.10.012","article-title":"Upper limb fractures in children","volume":"35","author":"D. J. Bryson","year":"2017","journal-title":"Surg Oxf"},{"issue":"6","key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1177\/18632521221136100","article-title":"Resorbable magnesium screws for fixation of medial epicondyle avulsion fractures in skeletally immature patients: a comparison with Kirschner wires","volume":"16","author":"M. Baldini","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Child Orthop"},{"issue":"35","key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e22001","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000022001","article-title":"Is bioabsorbable screw an alternative choice for displaced medial epicondylar fractures in adolescents: a comparative study of metallic cannulated lag screw versus bioabsorbable screw","volume":"99","author":"J. Li","year":"2020","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"issue":"Suppl 3","key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2024.111403","article-title":"Comparison of biodegradable and metallic tension-band fixation for paediatric lateral condyle fracture of the elbow","volume":"55","author":"T. Kassai","year":"2024","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"6","key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"965","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.73B6.1659570","article-title":"Biodegradable pin fixation of elbow fractures in children. A randomised trial","volume":"73","author":"P. G. Hope","year":"1991","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"869418","DOI":"10.1155\/2013\/869418","article-title":"Lateral condyle fracture of the humerus in children treated with bioabsorbable materials","volume":"2013","author":"V. Andrey","year":"2013","journal-title":"Sci World J"},{"issue":"3","key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.33552\/GJOR.2021.03.000561","article-title":"Resorbable orthopedic implants in pediatric patients: a narrative review","volume":"3","author":"P. Truong","year":"2021","journal-title":"Glob J Orthop Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e19010","DOI":"10.1097\/md.0000000000019010","article-title":"Complications of hardware removal in pediatric upper limb surgery: a retrospective single-center study of 317 patients","volume":"99","author":"P. Scheider","year":"2020","journal-title":"Medicine"},{"issue":"22","key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.20.02231","article-title":"Complications of hardware removal","volume":"103","author":"P. J. Kellam","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg"},{"key":"ref20","article-title":"The burden of hardware removal in orthopaedics","author":"Inion Oy","year":"2021"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00393710","article-title":"Comparison of costs in ankle fractures treated with absorbable or metallic fixation devices","volume":"116","author":"T. Juutilainen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"ref22","article-title":"Comparison of four surgical methods for pediatric forearm double diaphyseal fractures: a retrospective analysis","author":"I. Guzel"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1615\/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v21.i2.10","article-title":"Short-term and long-term effects of orthopedic biodegradable implants","volume":"21","author":"A. R. Amini","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Long-term Eff Med Implants"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.4103\/jmsr.jmsr_1_19","article-title":"Iatrogenic nerve injuries in orthopaedics","volume":"3","author":"J. Y. Soh","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Musculoskelet Surg Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1302\/1863-2548.15.210004","article-title":"Use of resorbable magnesium screws in children: systematic review of the literature and short-term follow-up from our series","volume":"15","author":"M. Baldini","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Child Orthop"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1515\/iss-2018-0006","article-title":"Resorbable implants in pediatric fracture treatment","volume":"3","author":"N. G. Gr\u00fcn","year":"2018","journal-title":"Innov Surg Sci"},{"key":"ref27","first-page":"187","article-title":"Indications for operative treatment of fractures in childhood","volume":"12","author":"U. G. Stauffer","year":"1978","journal-title":"Prog Pediatr Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1590\/1413-785220152305145030","article-title":"Kirschner wire versus titanium elastic nails in pediatric femoral shaft fractures","volume":"23","author":"C. Isik","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Ortop Bras"},{"issue":"6","key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"768","DOI":"10.5999\/aps.2014.41.6.768","article-title":"Comparison between intramedullary nailing and percutaneous K-wire fixation for fractures in the distal third of the metacarpal bone","volume":"41","author":"S. J. Moon","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Plast Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1177\/18632521241293954","article-title":"Metal implants in children","volume":"18","author":"P. J. Cundy","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Child Orthop"},{"issue":"3","key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100053","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jham.2024.100053","article-title":"Polylactic acid bioabsorbable implants of the hand: a review","volume":"16","author":"E. Jee","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Hand Microsurg"},{"issue":"5","key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1531","DOI":"10.3892\/etm.2013.1017","article-title":"Absorbable implants versus metal implants for the treatment of ankle fractures: a meta-analysis","volume":"5","author":"Z. H. Li","year":"2013","journal-title":"Exp Ther Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bbe.2020.02.003","article-title":"Biodegradable bone implants in orthopedic applications: a review","volume":"40","author":"G. Chandra","year":"2020","journal-title":"Biocybern Biomed Eng"}],"container-title":["Orthopedic Reviews"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/orthopedicreviews.openmedicalpublishing.org\/article\/166443-polymer-based-resorbable-vs-non-resorbable-implants-for-pediatric-upper-extremity-fractures-a-systematic-review","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]],"date-time":"2026-08-19T18:28:37Z","timestamp":1787164117000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/orthopedicreviews.openmedicalpublishing.org\/article\/166443-polymer-based-resorbable-vs-non-resorbable-implants-for-pediatric-upper-extremity-fractures-a-systematic-review"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]]},"references-count":33,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.52965\/001c.166443","relation":{},"ISSN":["2035-8164"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2035-8164","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]]}}}