{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,4]],"date-time":"2025-03-04T05:43:34Z","timestamp":1741067014106,"version":"3.38.0"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"19_suppl","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,1]],"date-time":"2012-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1349049600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Urologia"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title><jats:p> The open surgery approach is the gold standard for the treatment of prostatic adenoma with a volume over 80 mL. <\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Patients and methods<\/jats:title><jats:p> We studied 180 patients from June 2004 to June 2011, affected by prostatic adenoma &gt;80 mL, and who underwent endoscopic resection performed with bipolar technique by a single operator. We considered the following data: surgery duration, bleeding, absorption of irrigating fluids, resected tissue quantity, clinical stay, and catheterization time. Resections up to the surgical capsule were performed with bipolar Gyrus resector and the fragments were collected with prostate Ellik-type conveyor. Next step was the positioning of the bladder catheter with cystoclysis. We evaluated early and late complications and performed clinical reassessment of the patients at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. <\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p> Surgery average time was 118 min. The average resected tissue volume was 92 g. The post-surgery hemoglobin was 13.2 g\/dL. In 15 patients a revision of the lodge was performed within 24 hours after resection; no blood transfusions were performed. The catheter was removed after 3.2 days and the average recovery time was 4 days. There were eight cases of cicatricial stenosis of the bladder neck treated with endoscopic laparotomy. There were no cases of post-TURP syndrome. The IPSS parameters varied from 20.7 to 3.8, the IIEF5 from 19.3 to 21.2. The average QoL decreased from 4 to 1.5, Qmax from 22.2 7.7 mL\/sec. The total PSA values decreased from 6.39 ng\/mL to 1.0 ng\/mL. <\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p> TURP for prostatic adenomas greater than 80 mL in volume, is a valid alternative in terms of efficacy and safety to open surgery, considered the gold standard treatment. <\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.5301\/ru.2012.9735","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,18]],"date-time":"2012-10-18T21:54:03Z","timestamp":1350597243000},"page":"30-36","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Endoscopic Prostate Resection by Bipolar Gyrus Resector for Prostates over 80 ml: Our Experience after a 12-Month follow-up"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"79","author":[{"given":"Andrea","family":"Corona","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinica Urologica - Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Cagliari - Italy"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Simona","family":"Serra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinica Urologica - Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Cagliari - Italy"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marco","family":"Deplano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinica Urologica - Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Cagliari - Italy"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Antonello","family":"De Lisa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinica Urologica - Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Cagliari - Italy"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-RU.2012.9735","unstructured":"Guidelines European Association of Urology."},{"key":"bibr2-RU.2012.9735","unstructured":"Guidelines American Urological Association."},{"key":"bibr3-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0210-4806(06)73515-X"},{"key":"bibr4-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2005.07.033"},{"issue":"47","key":"bibr5-RU.2012.9735","first-page":"3365","volume":"85","author":"Wu W.J.","year":"2005","journal-title":"Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi."},{"key":"bibr6-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2009.0011"},{"issue":"2","key":"bibr7-RU.2012.9735","first-page":"125","volume":"59","author":"Falsaperla M.","year":"2007","journal-title":"Minerva Urol Nefrol."},{"key":"bibr8-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/13645700601159410"},{"key":"bibr9-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3349\/ymj.2006.47.5.715"},{"key":"bibr10-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2003.07.002"},{"key":"bibr11-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-008-0359-8"},{"key":"bibr12-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2008.09.028"},{"issue":"3","key":"bibr13-RU.2012.9735","first-page":"4101","volume":"15","author":"Yuh B.","journal-title":"Can J Urol."},{"key":"bibr14-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2007.11.044"},{"key":"bibr15-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2006.0285"},{"issue":"12","key":"bibr16-RU.2012.9735","first-page":"1091","volume":"13","author":"Zhang Y.","year":"2007","journal-title":"Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue."},{"journal-title":"J Endourol.","year":"2006","author":"Krambeck A.E.","key":"bibr17-RU.2012.9735"},{"key":"bibr18-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2006.04.003"},{"key":"bibr19-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2008.03.015"},{"key":"bibr20-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1569-9056(08)60519-9"},{"volume-title":"Benign prostate hyperplasia more than 100 ml: is Gyrus TURP superior to open prostatectomy?","year":"2004","author":"Tan A.","key":"bibr21-RU.2012.9735"},{"key":"bibr22-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1100\/tsw.2007.241"},{"key":"bibr23-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MOU.0b013e328320a61a"},{"issue":"1","key":"bibr24-RU.2012.9735","first-page":"55","volume":"83","author":"Chen Q.","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int."},{"key":"bibr25-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2007.0005"},{"issue":"10","key":"bibr26-RU.2012.9735","first-page":"907","volume":"14","author":"Zhu Q.Y.","year":"2008","journal-title":"Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue,"},{"key":"bibr27-RU.2012.9735","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2005.05253.x"}],"container-title":["Urologia Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.5301\/RU.2012.9735","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.5301\/RU.2012.9735","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,3]],"date-time":"2025-03-03T14:43:29Z","timestamp":1741013009000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.5301\/RU.2012.9735"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,10]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"19_suppl","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.5301\/RU.2012.9735"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5301\/ru.2012.9735","relation":{},"ISSN":["0391-5603","1724-6075"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0391-5603"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1724-6075"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,10]]}}}