{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,11]],"date-time":"2026-08-11T20:14:54Z","timestamp":1786479294461,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"The Pennsylvania State University Press","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Autonomy is foundational to ethics, political philosophy, philosophy of mind, and it has been closely associated with argumentation. What is curious about autonomy is that it has traditionally been explained in terms of reasoning and argument: autonomy involves reasoning because, standardly, someone who\u2019s autonomous is one who thinks things through, who has reasons for their actions. Autonomy regards argument because to respect the autonomy of someone who thinks things through, one must offer them reasons, that is, argue with them. One common thought is that provided one\u2019s arguments meet certain criteria (e.g., they\u2019re not sophistries or clever manipulations), then argument respects autonomy. But is this really so? No. Properly understood, argument is a kind of paternalism, for to argue with someone means to enter into and manage their stream of reasons, the very things that account for their autonomy.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.5325\/philrhet.57.3.0276","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,10]],"date-time":"2024-12-10T12:38:54Z","timestamp":1733834334000},"page":"276-289","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Argument\u2019s Autonomy Problem"],"prefix":"10.5325","volume":"57","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7665-763X","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"John","family":"Casey","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Philosophy Program, Northeastern Illinois University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"3287","reference":[{"key":"2024121017374865700_r1","volume-title":"Epistemic Paternalism: A Defence","year":"2013"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r2","volume-title":"Why We Argue (and How We Should): Guide to Disagreement in an Age of Unreason","year":"2019","edition":"2nd"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.2307\/2214077","article-title":"\u201cThe Deontological Conception of Epistemic Justification.\u201d","volume":"2","year":"1988","journal-title":"Philosophical Perspectives"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r4","first-page":"117","article-title":"\u201cVarieties of Autonomy.\u201d","year":"2002","journal-title":"Unprincipled Virtue"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r5","unstructured":"Bailin, Sharon, and MarkBattersby. 2017. \u201cDAMned if You Do, DAMned if You Don\u2019t: Cohen\u2019s \u2018Missed Opportunities.\u2019\u201d In Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias. Proceedings of the 11th Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) Conference, ed. PatrickBondy and LauraBenacquista, 1\u201312. https:\/\/scholar.uwindsor.ca\/ossaarchive\/OSSA11\/papersandcommentaries\/90."},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r6","volume-title":"Critical Thinking: A Student\u2019s Introduction","year":"2005","edition":"2nd"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024121017374865700_r7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1075\/jaic.1.1.02bic","article-title":"\u201cArgumentation and Informed Consent in the Doctor\u2013Patient Relationship.\u201d","volume":"1","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of Argumentation in Context"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024121017374865700_r8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1080\/00028533.1977.11951099","article-title":"\u201cCharacteristics of Arguments and Arguing.\u201d","volume":"13","year":"1977","journal-title":"Argumentation and Advocacy"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024121017374865700_r9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v40i1.5969","article-title":"\u201cAdversariality and Argumentation.\u201d","volume":"40","year":"2020","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024121017374865700_r10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1086\/293038","article-title":"\u201cConstructing the Inner Citadel: Recent Work on the Concept of Autonomy.\u201d","volume":"99","year":"1988","journal-title":"Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024121017374865700_r11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/00455091.1991.10717234","article-title":"\u201cAutonomy and Personal History.\u201d","volume":"21","year":"1991","journal-title":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r12","first-page":"27","article-title":"\u201cAutonomy.\u201d","year":"1989","journal-title":"The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law Volume 3: Harm to Self"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024121017374865700_r13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1080\/03637759509376345","article-title":"\u201cBeyond Persuasion: A Proposal for an Invitational Rhetoric.\u201d","volume":"62","year":"1995","journal-title":"Communication Monographs"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r14","first-page":"225","article-title":"\u201cTestimony and Epistemic Autonomy.\u201d","year":"2006","journal-title":"The Epistemology of Testimony"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024121017374865700_r15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1080\/00028533.1996.11977995","article-title":"\u201cTranscending Our Conception of Argument in Light of Feminist Critiques.\u201d","volume":"32","year":"1996","journal-title":"Argumentation and Advocacy"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024121017374865700_r16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1016\/S0148-0685(79)91809-8","article-title":"\u201cThe Womanization of Rhetoric.\u201d","volume":"2","year":"1979","journal-title":"Women\u2019s Studies International Quarterly"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r17","first-page":"181","volume-title":"Epistemic Paternalism: Conceptions, Justifications, and Implications","year":"2020"},{"issue":"5","key":"2024121017374865700_r18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"845","DOI":"10.1007\/s11245-021-09768-9","article-title":"\u201cThe Compliment of Rational Opposition: Disagreement, Adversariality, and Disputation.\u201d","volume":"40","year":"2021","journal-title":"Topoi"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024121017374865700_r19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.2307\/2026984","article-title":"\u201cEpistemic Paternalism: Communication Control in Law and Society.\u201d","volume":"88","year":"1991","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophy"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024121017374865700_r20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1017\/S0012217300037483","article-title":"\u201cBelief, Values, and the Will.\u201d","volume":"15","year":"1976","journal-title":"Dialogue"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r21","volume-title":"The Philosophy of Argument","year":"2000"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r22","volume-title":"A Practical Study of Argument","year":"2010"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024121017374865700_r23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v41i4.6876","article-title":"\u201cReflections on Minimal Adversariality.\u201d","volume":"41","year":"2021","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r24","volume-title":"Good Reasoning Matters! A Constructive Approach to Critical Thinking","year":"2008","edition":"4th"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r25","volume-title":"Fallacies","year":"1970"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r26","first-page":"122","volume-title":"Mental Action and the Conscious Mind","year":"2022"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024121017374865700_r27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352325200000434","article-title":"\u201cThe Moral Magic of Consent.\u201d","volume":"2","year":"1996","journal-title":"Legal Theory"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r28","first-page":"132","article-title":"\u201cWhat\u2019s Epistemic about Epistemic Paternalism?\u201d","year":"2021","journal-title":"Epistemic Autonomy"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r29","volume-title":"Logical Self-Defense","year":"2006"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024121017374865700_r30","first-page":"133","article-title":"\u201cThe Concept of Autonomy.\u201d","volume":"31","year":"1994","journal-title":"American Philosophical Quarterly"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024121017374865700_r31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-020-09534-y","article-title":"\u201cArgument, Inference, and Persuasion.\u201d","volume":"35","year":"2021","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024121017374865700_r32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1075\/jaic.18022.mun","article-title":"\u201cDisputing with Patients in Person-Centered Care: Ethical Aspects in Standard Care, Pediatrics, Psychiatry, and Public Health.\u201d","volume":"7","year":"2018","journal-title":"Journal of Argumentation in Context"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r33","volume-title":"Philosophical Explanations","year":"1981"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024121017374865700_r34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1080\/00028533.1977.11951098","article-title":"\u201cTwo Concepts of Argument.\u201d","volume":"13","year":"1977","journal-title":"Argumentation and Advocacy"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0783-1_4","article-title":"\u201cThe Relation of Argument to Inference.\u201d","volume":"4","year":"2001","journal-title":"Argument, Inference and Dialectic"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024121017374865700_r36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-006-9014-y","article-title":"\u201c\u2018Let Me Tell You Why!\u2019: When Argumentation in Doctor\u2013Patient Interaction Makes a Difference.\u201d","volume":"20","year":"2006","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024121017374865700_r37","first-page":"204","article-title":"\u201cA Theory of Freedom of Expression.\u201d","volume":"1","year":"1972","journal-title":"Philosophy & Public Affairs"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"2024121017374865700_r38","first-page":"195","article-title":"\u201cThe Necessary Pluralism of Any Future History of Rhetoric.\u201d","volume":"12","year":"1991","journal-title":"Pre\/Text"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024121017374865700_r39","first-page":"159","article-title":"\u201cWhy Should Educators Care about Argumentation?\u201d","volume":"17","year":"1995","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r40","article-title":"\u201cAsking before Arguing? Consent in Argumentation.\u201d","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024121017374865700_r41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1111\/papa.12026","article-title":"\u201cRational Persuasion as Paternalism: Rational Persuasion as Paternalism.\u201d","volume":"42","year":"2014","journal-title":"Philosophy & Public Affairs"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r42","volume-title":"Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning","year":"1995"},{"key":"2024121017374865700_r43","first-page":"136","article-title":"\u201cDeciding to Believe.\u201d","year":"1973","journal-title":"Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956\u20131972"}],"container-title":["Philosophy &amp; Rhetoric"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/scholarlypublishingcollective.org\/psup\/p-n-r\/article-pdf\/57\/3\/276\/2173160\/philrhet_57_3_276.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/scholarlypublishingcollective.org\/psup\/p-n-r\/article-pdf\/57\/3\/276\/2173160\/philrhet_57_3_276.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,5]],"date-time":"2026-06-05T10:35:11Z","timestamp":1780655711000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/scholarlypublishingcollective.org\/p-n-r\/article\/57\/3\/276\/392997\/Argument-s-Autonomy-Problem"},"secondary":[{"URL":"https:\/\/muse.jhu.edu\/article\/948196","label":"SECONDARY_X"}]},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]},"references-count":43,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,2]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5325\/philrhet.57.3.0276","relation":{},"ISSN":["0031-8213","1527-2079"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0031-8213","type":"print"},{"value":"1527-2079","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}}}