{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]],"date-time":"2026-01-23T15:04:34Z","timestamp":1769180674788,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":52,"publisher":"Highlights of Science, S.L.","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Highlights Sustain."],"abstract":"<jats:p>Sustainable development requires legitimate coordination of cross-sector trade-offs across environmental limits, social needs, and long-term economic viability. Because the implementation of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) relies on multi-actor arrangements, collaborative governance (CG) design features may condition whether participation translates into joint decision-making. CG emerges from these dynamic strategies to produce public products and services with multiple stakeholders, aligning and integrating the various parties\u2019 ambitions. Given the ongoing discussion on SDGs, marked by the complexity and interdependence of actors, innovative, collaborative solutions are needed to achieve the desired goals. This necessity is further underscored by introducing a goal related to partnerships and collaboration: \u201cPartnerships for Development\u201d (Goal 17), demonstrating that collaboration is a crucial element for sustainable development and the implementation of the SDGs and the 2030 Agenda. Thus, this study aims to explore how CG supports strategies to implement the SDGs. To this end, through content analysis, we examine four initiatives involving public and private actors related to the implementation of the SDGs in Portugal. We aim to analyze whether these meet the criteria of CG and the various dimensions anticipated for its process. Only one initiative meets the criteria for CG, and Portugal still needs an established collaborative governance arrangement for implementing the SDGs. Therefore, it is necessary to invest in collaborative arrangements initiated by public organizations that allow for participation in decision-making and greater consensus-building, preserving a real contribution to public policy and a better understanding of the impacts and benefits of collaboration. It is also necessary to discuss the need for metagovernance structures for sustainable development.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.54175\/hsustain5010006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]],"date-time":"2026-01-23T13:49:19Z","timestamp":1769176159000},"page":"70-83","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Exploring the Criteria and Processes of Collaborative Governance for SDG Implementation in Portugal"],"prefix":"10.54175","volume":"5","author":[{"name":"Institute of Social and Political Sciences, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Almerindo Lessa, 1300-663 Lisbon, Portugal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9672-2555","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Susana","family":"Sobral","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9372-083X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jo\u00e3o","family":"Ricardo Catarino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"name":"Centre for Public Administration and Public Policies, Institute of Social and Political Sciences, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Almerindo Lessa, 1300-663 Lisbon, Portugal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6808-7769","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alexandre","family":"Morais Nunes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"name":"Centre for Public Administration and Public Policies, Institute of Social and Political Sciences, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Almerindo Lessa, 1300-663 Lisbon, Portugal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"32468","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref=1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schaltegger, S., Beckmann, M., & Hockerts, K. (2018). Collaborative entrepreneurship for sustainability. Creating solutions in light of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 131\u2013152. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1504\/IJEV.2018.092709","DOI":"10.1504\/IJEV.2018.092709"},{"key":"ref=2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Niesten, E., Jolink, A., Jabbour, A., Chappin, M., & Lozano, R. (2017). Sustainable collaboration: The impact of governance and institutions on sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155(2), 1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclepro.2016.12.085","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2016.12.085"},{"key":"ref=3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fiorino, D. J. (2010). Sustainability as a conceptual focus for public administration. Public Administration Review, 70, s78\u2013s88. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1540-6210.2010.02249.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-6210.2010.02249.x"},{"key":"ref=4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berceanu, I. B., & Nicolescu, C. E. (2024). Collaborative Public Administration\u2014A Dimension of Sustainable Development: Exploratory Study on Local Authorities in Romania. Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 30. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/admsci14020030","DOI":"10.3390\/admsci14020030"},{"key":"ref=5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2005). New Public Management Is Dead\u2014Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467\u2013494. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jopart\/mui057","DOI":"10.1093\/jopart\/mui057"},{"key":"ref=6","unstructured":"Christensen, T., & L\u00e6greid, P. (2007). Transcending New Public Management. Aldershot."},{"key":"ref=7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reiter, R., & Klenk, T. (2019). The manifold meanings of \u2018post-New Public Management\u2019 \u2013 a systematic literature review. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 11\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0020852318759736","DOI":"10.1177\/0020852318759736"},{"key":"ref=8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2015). How does collaborative governance scale? Policy & Politics, 43(3), 315\u2013329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1332\/030557315X14353344872935","DOI":"10.1332\/030557315X14353344872935"},{"key":"ref=9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Blanco, I. (2015). Between democratic network governance and neoliberalism: A regime-theoretical analysis of collaboration in Barcelona. Cities, 44, 123\u2013130. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cities.2014.10.007","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cities.2014.10.007"},{"key":"ref=10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lima, V. (2021). Collaborative Governance for Sustainable Development. In W. L. Filho, A. Azul, L. Brandli, A. Salvia, P. Ozuyar, & T. Wall (Eds.), Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions. Springer, Cham. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-71066-2_2-1","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-71066-2_2-1"},{"key":"ref=11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sundqvist-Andberg, H., & \u00c5kerman, M. (2022). Collaborative governance as a means of navigating the uncertainties of sustainability transformations: the case of Finnish food packaging. Ecological Economics, 197, 107455. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ecolecon.2022.107455","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ecolecon.2022.107455"},{"key":"ref=12","unstructured":"United Nations. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future."},{"key":"ref=13","unstructured":"Kim, T. B. (2010). Collaborative Governance for Sustainable Development in Urban Planning in South Korea [PhD thesis, University of Birmingham]. The University of Birmingham eTheses Repository. http:\/\/etheses.bham.ac.uk\/id\/eprint\/747 (accessed 28 January 2025)."},{"key":"ref=14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 681\u2013695. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11625-018-0627-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s11625-018-0627-5"},{"key":"ref=15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O\u2019Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13(1), 38\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sd.244","DOI":"10.1002\/sd.244"},{"key":"ref=16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tichener, M., Merry, S. E., Grek, S., & Bandola-Gill, J. (2022). Global public policy in a quantified world: Sustainable Development Goals as epistemic infrastructures. Policy and Society, 41(4), 431\u2013444. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/polsoc\/puac015","DOI":"10.1093\/polsoc\/puac015"},{"key":"ref=17","unstructured":"Rep\u00fablica Portuguesa. (2023). 2023 Voluntary National Review."},{"key":"ref=18","unstructured":"Bouckaert, G., Loretan, R., & Troupin, S. (2016). Public Administration and the Sustainable Development Goals (Written Statement by the International Institute of Administrative Sciences, Submitted to the 15th session of the United Nations Committee of Experts in Public Administration)."},{"key":"ref=19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R. (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26\u201327, 26\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cosust.2017.01.010","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cosust.2017.01.010"},{"key":"ref=20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wibawa, S., & Nur\u2019aini, D. (2020). Collaborative Governance in achieving Sustainable Development Goals: A Conceptual Framework. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Pemerintahan Indonesia, 1(1), 35\u201342.","DOI":"10.33830\/jiapi.v1i1.29"},{"key":"ref=21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vazquez-Brust, D., Piao, R., Melo, M., Yaryd, R., & Carvalho, M. (2020). The governance of collaboration for sustainable development: Exploring the \u201cblack box\u201d. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120260. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclepro.2020.120260","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2020.120260"},{"key":"ref=22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fowler, A., & Biekart, K. (2017). Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives for Sustainable Development Goals: The importance of interlocutors. Public Administration and Development, 37, 81\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pad.1795","DOI":"10.1002\/pad.1795"},{"key":"ref=23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jopart\/mur011","DOI":"10.1093\/jopart\/mur011"},{"key":"ref=24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Doberstein, C. (2016). Designing Collaborative Governance Decision-Making in Search of a \u2018Collaborative Advantage\u2019. Public Management Review, 18(6), 819\u2013841. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14719037.2015.1045019","DOI":"10.1080\/14719037.2015.1045019"},{"key":"ref=25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thomson, A. M., Perry, J. L., & Miller, T. K. (2007). Conceptualizing and Measuring Collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 23\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jopart\/mum036","DOI":"10.1093\/jopart\/mum036"},{"key":"ref=26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Voets, J., Brandsen, T., Koliba, C., & Verschuere, B. (2021). Collaborative Governance. Oxford Research Encyclopedias. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acrefore\/9780190228637.013.1419","DOI":"10.1093\/acrefore\/9780190228637.013.1419"},{"key":"ref=27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bartenberger, M., & Grubmu\u0308ller-R\u00e9gent, V. (2014). The Enabling Effects of Open Government Data on Collaborative Governance in Smart City Contexts. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government (JeDEM), 6(1), 36\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.29379\/jedem.v6i1.289","DOI":"10.29379\/jedem.v6i1.289"},{"key":"ref=28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543\u2013571. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jopart\/mum032","DOI":"10.1093\/jopart\/mum032"},{"key":"ref=29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2012). Governance network theory: past, present and future. Policy & Politics, 40(4), 587\u2013606. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1332\/030557312X655431","DOI":"10.1332\/030557312X655431"},{"key":"ref=30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen, B. (2010). Antecedents or Processes? Determinants of Perceived Effectiveness of Interorganizational Collaborations for Public Service Delivery. International Public Management Journal, 13(4), 381\u2013407. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10967494.2010.524836","DOI":"10.1080\/10967494.2010.524836"},{"key":"ref=31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Huxham, C. (1993). Collaborative capability: An intra\u2010organizational perspective on collaborative advantage. Public Money & Management, 13(3), 21\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09540969309387771","DOI":"10.1080\/09540969309387771"},{"key":"ref=32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B., & Stone, M. (2006). The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x"},{"key":"ref=33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Batory, A., & Svensson, S. (2019). The fuzzy concept of collaborative governance: A systematic review of the state of the art. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 13(2), 28\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2478\/cejpp-2019-0008","DOI":"10.2478\/cejpp-2019-0008"},{"key":"ref=34","unstructured":"Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design \u2013 Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications."},{"key":"ref=35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ospina, S. M., Esteve, M., & Lee, S. (2018). Assessing Qualitative Studies in Public Administration Research. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 593\u2013605. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/puar.12837","DOI":"10.1111\/puar.12837"},{"key":"ref=36","unstructured":"Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research Design and Methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications."},{"key":"ref=37","unstructured":"Bardin, L. (2016). An\u00e1lise de Conte\u00fado (in Portuguese). Edi\u00e7\u00f5es 70."},{"key":"ref=38","unstructured":"Rep\u00fablica Portuguesa. (2017). Relat\u00f3rio nacional sobre a implementa\u00e7\u00e3o da Agenda 2030 para o Desenvolvimento Sustent\u00e1vel (in Portuguese). Minist\u00e9rio dos Neg\u00f3cios Estrangeiros. https:\/\/sdgtoolkit.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/Portugal-VNR-2017-Full-report_PT.pdf (accessed 7 February 2025)."},{"key":"ref=39","unstructured":"Global Compact Network Portugal. (n.d). Termos de Refer\u00eancia para a Alian\u00e7a ODS Portugal (in Portuguese). https:\/\/globalcompact.pt\/images\/Alianca_ODS_Portugal_-_Termos_de_Referncia.pdf (accessed 7 February 2025)."},{"key":"ref=40","unstructured":"Conselho Nacional do Ambiente e do Desenvolvimento Sustent\u00e1vel. (2023). Plano de Atividades 2023 (in Portuguese). https:\/\/www.cnads.pt\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Plano-de-AtividadesCNADS23.pdf (accessed 7 February 2025)."},{"key":"ref=41","unstructured":"ODSlocal. (2022). Perguntas Frequentes (in Portuguese). https:\/\/odslocal.pt\/perguntas-frequentes#O_que_e_a_plataformaODSlocal (accessed 7 February 2025)."},{"key":"ref=42","unstructured":"Business Council for Sustainable Development (2022). Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustent\u00e1vel (in Portuguese). https:\/\/ods.pt\/ods (accessed 7 February 2025)"},{"key":"ref=43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Booher, D. (2004). Collaborative Governance Practices and Democracy. National Civic Review, 93(4), 32\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ncr.69","DOI":"10.1002\/ncr.69"},{"key":"ref=44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S\u00f8rensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234\u2013258. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.x"},{"key":"ref=45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S\u00f8rensen, E. (2005). Metagovernance The Changing Role of Politicians in Processes of Democratic Governance. American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 98\u2013114. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0275074005282584","DOI":"10.1177\/0275074005282584"},{"key":"ref=46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bell, S., & Park, A. (2006). The Problematic Metagovernance of Networks: Water Reform in New South Wales. Journal of Public Policy, 26(1), 63\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0143814X06000432","DOI":"10.1017\/S0143814X06000432"},{"key":"ref=47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fox, A., Law, J. R., & Baker, K. (2022). The case for metagovernance: The promises and pitfalls of multisectoral nutrition service delivery structures in low\u2010 and middle\u2010income countries. Public Administration and Development, 42(2), 128\u2013141. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pad.1974","DOI":"10.1002\/pad.1974"},{"key":"ref=48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stark, A. (2015). More micro than meta? Competing concepts of metagovernance in the European Union. Public Policy and Administration, 30(1), 73\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0952076714543862","DOI":"10.1177\/0952076714543862"},{"key":"ref=49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beisheim, M., & Simon, N. (2018). Multistakeholder Partnerships for the SDGs: Actors\u2019 Views on UN Metagovernance. Global Governance, 24(4), 497\u2013515. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/19426720-02404003","DOI":"10.1163\/19426720-02404003"},{"key":"ref=50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Christopoulos, S, Horvath, B., & Kull, M. (2012). Advancing the governance of cross-sectoral policies for sustainable development: a metagovernance perspective. Public Admininistration and Development, 32(3), 305\u2013323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pad.1629","DOI":"10.1002\/pad.1629"},{"key":"ref=51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fiandrino, S., Trana, M. G., Tonelli, A., & Rizzato, F. (2023). Metagovernance forms for enhancing sustainability-oriented innovation in a knowledge ecosystem. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 34, 215\u2013230. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/beer.12635","DOI":"10.1111\/beer.12635"},{"key":"ref=52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meuleman, L., & Niestroy, I. (2015). Common But Differentiated Governance: A Metagovernance Approach to Make the SDGs Work. Sustainability, 7(9), 12295\u201312321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/su70912295","DOI":"10.3390\/su70912295"}],"container-title":["Highlights of Sustainability"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]],"date-time":"2026-01-23T13:49:27Z","timestamp":1769176167000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.hos.pub\/articles\/hsustain5010006"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]]},"references-count":52,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,25]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.54175\/hsustain5010006","relation":{},"ISSN":["2696-628X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2696-628X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]]}}}