{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,30]],"date-time":"2022-03-30T03:06:35Z","timestamp":1648609595281},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["CUAJ"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Introduction: We sought to compare the surgical outcomes of hypospadias\u00a0repair with correction of inguinal pathology using a single\u00a0penile incision vs. conventional approach using two incisions.Methods: This is a retrospective study that reviewed all patients\u00a0who underwent concurrent surgical repair for both hypospadias\u00a0and inguinal pathologies between January 2003 and November\u00a02015. Patients were classified into Group A, conventional (inguinal\u00a0or scrotal and penile incision) approach; or Group B, single penile\u00a0incision approach. Baseline characteristics, including age, degree\u00a0of hypospadias, type and laterality of inguinal pathology, operative\u00a0time, and surgical outcomes, were collected. Between groups, variable comparisons were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U-Test\u00a0and Fisher-exact test. Statistical significant set at &lt;0.05.Results: Seventy-six patients (Group A: 40; Group B: 36) were\u00a0eligible for study. Baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable,\u00a0with no significant statistical difference. Overall meanoperative time for Group A was 139.3 \u00b1 56.2 minutes, while Group\u00a0B was 107.8 \u00b1 46.7 minutes (Z=2.6; U=470.5; p=0.009). Two\u00a0patients in Group A and two patients in Group B had testicularascension, all of which also had hypospadias-related complications\u00a0(p=1.0). Hypospadias-related complications in Group A included\u00a0seven urethrocutaneous fistulae and two repair dehiscence. Eighturethrocutaneous fistulae, one urethral stricture, and two repair\u00a0dehiscence occurred in Group B (p=0.448). Surgical outcome\u00a0appearance in both groups were comparable, with no statisticallysignificant difference (p=0.466).Conclusions: Single penile incision for both hypospadias repair\u00a0and correction of inguinal pathology is a feasible technique and\u00a0comparable to the conventional approach, with similar surgical\u00a0outcomes and shorter overall operative time.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.5489\/cuaj.4007","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,9]],"date-time":"2017-05-09T13:35:38Z","timestamp":1494336938000},"page":"192","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Single penile incision for combined hypospadias and inguinal surgery: A comparative study"],"prefix":"10.5489","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Michael E.","family":"Chua","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Naif","family":"Alqarni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jessica M.","family":"Ming","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fahad","family":"Alyami","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joana","family":"Dos Santos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Roberto","family":"Iglesias Lopes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Walid A.","family":"Farhat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Martin A.","family":"Koyle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"3456","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,9]]},"container-title":["Canadian Urological Association Journal"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.cuaj.ca\/index.php\/journal\/article\/viewFile\/4007\/3128","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/www.cuaj.ca\/index.php\/journal\/article\/viewFile\/4007\/3128","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,9]],"date-time":"2017-05-09T13:35:43Z","timestamp":1494336943000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.cuaj.ca\/index.php\/journal\/article\/view\/4007"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,9]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,9]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5489\/cuaj.4007","relation":{},"ISSN":["1920-1214","1911-6470"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1920-1214","type":"electronic"},{"value":"1911-6470","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,9]]}}}