{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,25]],"date-time":"2026-06-25T20:01:08Z","timestamp":1782417668056,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"STEF92 Technology","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>This paper refers on the outcomes of an experimental study developed in an industrial plant in the centre of Italy in which dust emission represents an important annoyance affecting the whole activity and so requiring to be managed in order to guarantee legal compliance but, above all, a safe workplace. This case study consists in the assessment of the efficacy of different reduction measures designed to avoid and, where not possible, to reduce dust emissions from stockpiles. According to a monitoring campaign based on field sampled data, these areas were identified as the most pollutant sources in the plant itself and many solutions were taken into consideration to reduce the emission due to wind erosion. Under these conditions wind fences represent a significant solution to be tested in addition to usual measures which are usually installed. In particular some simulations are performed in order to define the variation of wind velocity all around the stockpile and so to select and design the best solution and configuration to reduce the emission of fugitive dust from stockpiles when caused by wind erosion.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.5593\/sgem2024\/1.1\/s03.53","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,4]],"date-time":"2024-12-04T12:26:12Z","timestamp":1733315172000},"page":"407-414","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["WIND BARRIERS AS A POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO PM10 EMISSIONS IN INDUSTRIAL PLANTS"],"prefix":"10.5593","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Stefano","family":"Carbone","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"IC Engineering Consulting, HSE Division","place":["Italy"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"V.","family":"De Brito","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"IC Engineering Consulting, HSE Division","place":["Italy"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"3602","reference":[{"key":"ref=1","unstructured":"[1] Vella, J.A., Camilleri, R.,. Fine dust emissions from softstone quarrying in Malta. Xjenza. 10. pp. 47-54. 2005."},{"key":"ref=2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[2] Tartakovsky D. Stern E, Broday D.M, Dispersion of TSP and PM10 emissions from quarries in complex terrain, 2016, Science of the Total Environment, 542, pp. 946-954, 2016; doi: 10.1016\/j.scitotenv.2015.10.133.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.scitotenv.2015.10.133"},{"key":"ref=3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[3] Alfaro Degan, G., Di Bona, G., Lippiello D., Pinzari M. \ufffdPM10 dispersion model in quarrying activities, a comparison of an ISC3 approach to a mono\/multivariate geostatistical estimation\ufffd. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 86, 2006, ISSN 1743-3541, pp. 111-120, doi: 10.2495\/AIR06012.","DOI":"10.2495\/AIR06012"},{"key":"ref=4","unstructured":"[4] Alfaro Degan, G., Lippiello, D., Pinzari, M. Effectiveness of airborne dust control strategies in opencast quarrying activities: A case study near Rome. GEAM Geoingegneria Ambientale e Mineraria 139 (2), pp. 5 \ufffd 12, 2013, ISSN 1121-9041."},{"key":"ref=5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[5] Roney, J.A.; White, B.R. Estimating fugitive dust emission rates using an environmental boundary layer wind tunnel. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 7668\ufffd7685.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.atmosenv.2006.08.015"},{"key":"ref=6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[6] Torshizi, M. R., Miri, A., Shahriari, A., Dong, Z., & Davidson-Arnott, R. The effectiveness of a multi-row Tamarix windbreak in reducing aeolian erosion and sediment flux, Niatak area, Iran. Journal of Environmental Management, 265, 110486. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jenvman.2020.110486","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jenvman.2020.110486"},{"key":"ref=7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[7] Qiu, Y., Yuan, Y., Yu, R., & Liu, J. (2022). Aerodynamic shape optimization of porous fences with curved deflectors using surrogate modelling. Optimization and Engineering. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11081-022-09777-6.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11081-022-09777-6"},{"key":"ref=8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[8] Alghamdi, A. A., & Al-Kahtani, N. S. (2005). Sand Control Measures and Sand Drift Fences. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 19(4), 295\ufffd299. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1061\/(ASCE)0887-3828(2005)19:4(295).","DOI":"10.1061\/(ASCE)0887-3828(2005)19:4(295)"},{"key":"ref=9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[9] Dong, Z., Qian, G., Luo, W., & Wang, H. (2006). Threshold velocity for wind erosion: The effects of porous fences. Environmental Geology, 51(3), 471\ufffd475. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00254-006-0343-9.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00254-006-0343-9"},{"key":"ref=10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[10] Bruno, L., Fransos, D., & Lo Giudice, A. (2018). Solid barriers for windblown sand mitigation: Aerodynamic behavior and conceptual design guidelines. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 173, 79\ufffd90. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jweia.2017.12.005","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jweia.2017.12.005"},{"key":"ref=11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[11] Alfaro Degan G, Lippiello D, Pinzari M (2015). A comparison between methods for assessment of whole-body vibration exposure: A case study in a limestone quarry. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 8 (1), p. 90-97, 2018. ISSN: 2041-904X, doi: 10.2495\/SAFE-V8-N1-90-97.","DOI":"10.2495\/SAFE-V8-N1-90-97"}],"event":{"name":"24th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference 24","theme":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","location":"Albena, Bulgaria","acronym":"SGEM24","number":"24","sponsor":["SGEM WORLD SCIENCE (SWS) Scholarly Society, Austria"],"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,1]]},"end":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,7]]}},"container-title":["SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference\ufffd EXPO Proceedings","24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM 2024, Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration And Mining, Vol 24, Issue 1.1"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,25]],"date-time":"2026-06-25T19:28:18Z","timestamp":1782415698000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/epslibrary.at\/items\/b97a75bf-6a11-47ed-8acb-08a3b10df97a\/wind-barriers-as-a-possible-solution-to-pm10-emissions-in-industrial-plants"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]]},"references-count":11,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5593\/sgem2024\/1.1\/s03.53","relation":{},"ISSN":["1314-2704"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1314-2704","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]]}}}