{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,25]],"date-time":"2026-06-25T20:01:19Z","timestamp":1782417679329,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":9,"publisher":"STEF92 Technology","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Hydraulic conductivity (KS) is a critical parameter used in soil and land research, essential for accurate hydrological modelling. This study endeavours to compare assessments of KS across designated sites near the Czech Republic - Poland border using a range of measurement techniques, with the aim of establishing their reliability and variability for modelling applications. The investigation spans the determination of permeability from grain size curves, KS estimation via field infiltration tests employing the double-ring method, and laboratory KS determination using a constant head permeameter.\nThe findings reveal that the double-ring method for the determination of KS produces results akin to laboratory measurements conducted with the permeameter, showing consistency between the field and laboratory approaches. However, it is notable that the permeameter exhibits significant variability, particularly as the depth varies. Moreover, noteworthy disparities emerge between KS and permeability estimates, underscoring the need for careful consideration in the interpretation of these parameters.\nConsidering these results, it seems advisable to give precedence to field-based evaluations of KS for immediate assessments, as they provide valuable insights into real conditions. Conversely, for long-term assessments, the utilization of laboratory derived KS values may be more suitable, given their potential for stability over time. Nonetheless, the study emphasizes the necessity for further research to minimize the uncertainties and refine model inputs. Ultimately, this study underscores the intricate nature of hydraulic conductivity in soils and the imperative for comprehensive research to further develop water management models.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.5593\/sgem2024\/3.1\/s12.01","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,4]],"date-time":"2024-12-04T12:26:37Z","timestamp":1733315197000},"page":"3-10","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["COMPARISON OF FIELD AND LABORATORY METHODS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF SOIL HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY"],"prefix":"10.5593","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Stanislav","family":"Paseka","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Institute of Landscape Water Management","place":["Czech Republic"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"3602","reference":[{"key":"ref=1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[1]  Mohanty B. P., Kanwar, R. S., Everts C. J. Comparison of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Measurement Methods for a Glacial-Till Soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 1994 Volume 58. no. 3.","DOI":"10.2136\/sssaj1994.03615995005800030006x"},{"key":"ref=2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[2]  Attila Nemes, Walter J. Rawls, Yakov A. Pachepsky. Influence of Organic Matter on the Estimation of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2005. Volume 69, Issue 4.","DOI":"10.2136\/sssaj2004.0055"},{"key":"ref=3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[3]  R. K. Gupta, R. P. Rudra, W. T. Dickinson, N. K. Patni, G. J. Wall. Comparison of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Measured by Various Field Methods. 1993. Transactions of the ASAE. 36(1).","DOI":"10.13031\/2013.28313"},{"key":"ref=4","unstructured":"[4]  Standard: CSN EN ISO 17892-4 Geotechnicky pruzkum a zkouseni \ufffd Laboratorni zkousky zemin \ufffd Cast 4: Stanoveni zrnitosti."},{"key":"ref=5","unstructured":"[5]  Mallet, C., and Pacquant, J. Earth dams. Editions Eyrolles, 1951. Paris, 1\ufffd345."},{"key":"ref=6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[6]  Philip, J. R. The theory of infiltration: 4. Sorptivity and algebraic infiltration equations Soil Science. 1957. 84, 257-264.","DOI":"10.1097\/00010694-195709000-00010"},{"key":"ref=7","unstructured":"[7]  Laboratory permeameters \ufffd User manual. Eijkelkamp Soil & Water, Netherlands, 2017."},{"key":"ref=8","unstructured":"[8]  Standard: CSN EN ISO 17892-1 Geotechnicky pruzkum a zkouseni \ufffd Laboratorni zkousky zemin \ufffd Cast 1: Stanoveni vlhkosti."},{"key":"ref=9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[9]  Paseka, S., Marton, D. The Impact of the Uncertain Input Data of Multi-Purpose Reservoir Volumes under Hydrological Extremes. Water, 2021, 13(10).","DOI":"10.3390\/w13101389"}],"event":{"name":"24th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference 2024","theme":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","location":"Albena, Bulgaria","acronym":"SGEM24","number":"24","sponsor":["SGEM WORLD SCIENCE (SWS) Scholarly Society, Austria"],"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,1]]},"end":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,7]]}},"container-title":["SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference\ufffd EXPO Proceedings","24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM 2024, Water Resources. Forest, Marine and Ocean Ecosystems, Vol 24, Issue 3.1"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,25]],"date-time":"2026-06-25T19:28:29Z","timestamp":1782415709000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/epslibrary.at\/items\/b5194177-ddcf-4298-9a9b-e087f6d9e954\/comparison-of-field-and-laboratory-methods-for-the-assessment-of-soil-hydraulic-conductivi"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,1]]},"references-count":9,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5593\/sgem2024\/3.1\/s12.01","relation":{},"ISSN":["1314-2704"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1314-2704","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,1]]}}}