{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,3]],"date-time":"2026-07-03T08:21:56Z","timestamp":1783066916720,"version":"3.54.6"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Galenos Yayinevi","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,19]],"date-time":"2025-12-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1766102400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Turk J Phys Med Rehab"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,12]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Objectives:<\/jats:bold>\n                    The aim of this study was to investigate microprocessor-controlled (MIC) and non-microprocessor-controlled (non-MIC) prostheses in above-the-knee amputees in terms of energy consumption and gait pattern.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Patients and methods:<\/jats:bold>\n                    Between June 2018 and February 2019, a total of 34 unilateral transfemoral male amputee patients (mean age: 40.6\u00b113.2 years; range, 19 to 65 years) were included in this cross-sectional study. The patients were divided into two groups as Group 1 (n=17) using an MIC knee unit prosthesis and Group 2 (n=17) using a mechanical (n=5), pneumatic (n=8), or hydraulically (n=4) controlled knee unit prosthesis. Outcome measurements included three-dimensional gait analysis, Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 (LCI-5), exercise tolerance test, Satisfaction with Prosthesis Questionnaire (SAT-PRO), Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Questionnaire, and 6-min walk test (6MWT).\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Results:<\/jats:bold>\n                    In the MIC prosthesis group, amputated side walking speed (p=0.007), intact side walking speed (p=0.020), amputated side stride length (p=0.008), and amputated side single support phase duration (p=0.049) were significantly higher, while amputated side stride time (p=0.029) was significantly lower compared to the non-MIC prosthesis group. Energy consumption value was significantly lower in the MIC prosthesis group (p=0.005). The MIC prostheses were found to provide a significant improvement in physical health component compared to non-MIC prostheses (p&lt;0.05). Satisfaction with the current prosthesis was significantly higher in the MIC prosthesis group (p=0.002). The gait capacity was found to be significantly higher in the MIC prosthesis group (p&lt;0.001).\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Conclusion:<\/jats:bold>\n                    Our study results suggest that MIC prostheses should be used more widely in the rehabilitation process and daily lives of above-the-knee amputees.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.5606\/tftrd.2026.15612","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,16]],"date-time":"2026-03-16T16:40:52Z","timestamp":1773679252000},"page":"63-72","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The effect of microprocessor-controlled prostheses on walking pattern and energy consumption in above-the-knee amputees"],"prefix":"10.4274","volume":"72","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-7032-1569","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sabahat","family":"Gaye Baldug","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9325-3888","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"\u00dcm\u00fct","family":"G\u00fczelk\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2447-5065","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Emre","family":"Ad\u0131g\u00fczel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0978-6826","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yasin","family":"Demir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"2811","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref-1","unstructured":"Y\u00fczer GFN, \u00d6zgirgin N. Alt ekstremite amputasyonlar\u0131nda protez e\u011fitimi ve y\u00fcr\u00fcme rehabilitasyonu. T\u00fcrkiye Klinikleri J PM&R-Special Topics 2017;10:362-8."},{"key":"ref-2","unstructured":"Walsh NE, Bosker G, Santa Maria D. Upper and lower extremity prosthetics. In: DeLisa's Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: Principles and Practice: 5th ed. Wolters Kluwer Health Adis (ESP); 2012. p. 2017-50."},{"key":"ref-3","unstructured":"\u00c7ulha C. Transfemoral ve daha \u00fcst seviyeli amputasyonlarda protezler ve eklem se\u00e7imi. T\u00fcrkiye Klinikleri J PM&RSpecial Topics 2017;10:337-43."},{"key":"ref-4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Psonak N. Transfemoral prostheses: In: Lusardi MM, Jorge M, Nielson CC, editors. Orthotic & Prosthetics in Rehabilitation. 3rd ed. St Louis: Elsevier Inc.; 2013. p. 652-84.","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-1-4377-1936-9.00024-2"},{"key":"ref-5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Seymour R, Engbretson B, Kott K, Ordway N, Brooks G, Crannell J, et al. Comparison between the C-leg microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee and non-microprocessor control prosthetic knees: A preliminary study of energy expenditure, obstacle course performance, and quality of life survey. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007;31:51-61. doi: 10.1080\/03093640600982255.","DOI":"10.1080\/03093640600982255"},{"key":"ref-6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Eberly VJ, Mulroy SJ, Gronley JK, Perry J, Yule WJ, Burnfield JM. Impact of a stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on level walking in lower functioning individuals with a transfemoral amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2014;38:447-55. doi: 10.1177\/0309364613506912.","DOI":"10.1177\/0309364613506912"},{"key":"ref-7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lansade C, Vicaut E, Paysant J, M\u00e9nager D, Cristina MC, Braatz F, et al. Mobility and satisfaction with a microprocessor-controlled knee in moderately active amputees: A multi-centric randomized crossover trial. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2018;61:278-85. doi: 10.1016\/j. rehab.2018.04.003.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rehab.2018.04.003"},{"key":"ref-8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lin SJ, Bose NH. Six-minute walk test in persons with transtibial amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:2354-9. doi: 10.1016\/j.apmr.2008.05.021.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2008.05.021"},{"key":"ref-9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Battaglia G, Bellafiore M, Alesi M, Paoli A, Bianco A, Palma A. Effects of an adapted physical activity program on psychophysical health in elderly women. Clin Interv Aging 2016;11:1009-15. doi: 10.2147\/CIA.S109591.","DOI":"10.2147\/CIA.S109591"},{"key":"ref-10","unstructured":"Ko\u00e7yi\u011fit H, Aydemir \u00d6, Fi\u015fek G, \u00d6lmez N, Memi\u015f AK. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of short form36 (SF-36). J Drug Ther 1999;12:102-6."},{"key":"ref-11","unstructured":"Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grise MC, Lepage Y. The locomotor capabilities index: content validity. J Rehabil Outcomes Meas 1998;2:40-6."},{"key":"ref-12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Ferriero G, Mu\u00f1oz S, Orlandini D, Amoresano A. Rasch analysis of the Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 in people with lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007;31:394-404. doi: 10.1080\/03093640701253952.","DOI":"10.1080\/03093640701253952"},{"key":"ref-13","unstructured":"Safaz \u0130, G\u00f6ktepe AS, Y\u0131lmaz B, Ta\u015fkaynatan MA, Yaz\u0131c\u0131o\u011flu K. Reliability of locomotor capabilities index, houghton scale in young people with lower limb amputation. J PMR Sci 2009;12:15-8."},{"key":"ref-14","unstructured":"\u015eim\u015fek S, \u015eener F, Yakut Y. Validity and reliability of Turkish version of satisfaction with the prosthesis questionnaire in unilateral lower extremity amputees: a pilot study. Turkish Turk J Physiother Rehabil 2010;21:81-6."},{"key":"ref-15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bilodeau S, H\u00e9bert R, Desrosiers J. Questionnaire on the satisfaction of persons with lower-limb amputations towards their prosthesis: development and validation. Can J Occup Ther 1999;66:23-32. doi: 10.1177\/000841749906600103.","DOI":"10.1177\/000841749906600103"},{"key":"ref-16","unstructured":"Safaz \u0130, G\u00f6ktepe AS, Y\u0131lmaz B, Ta\u015fkaynatan MA, Yaz\u0131c\u0131o\u011flu K. Reliability and validity of satisfaction with prothesis (SATPRO) questionnarie in patient with lower limb amputation. Nobel Medicus 2010;6:9-12."},{"key":"ref-17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ladlow P, Nightingale TE, McGuigan MP, Bennett AN, Phillip RD, Bilzon JLJ. Predicting ambulatory energy expenditure in lower limb amputees using multi-sensor methods. PLoS One 2019;14:e0209249. doi: 10.1371\/journal. pone.0209249.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0209249"},{"key":"ref-18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mohamed A, Sexton A, Simonsen K, McGibbon CA. Development of a mechanistic hypothesis linking compensatory biomechanics and stepping asymmetry during gait of transfemoral amputees. Appl Bionics Biomech 2019;2019:4769242. doi: 10.1155\/2019\/4769242.","DOI":"10.1155\/2019\/4769242"},{"key":"ref-19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hofstad C, Linde H, Limbeek J, Postema K. Prescription of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms after lower limb amputation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;2004:CD003978. doi: 10.1002\/14651858.CD003978. pub2.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003978.pub2"},{"key":"ref-20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Graham LE, Datta D, Heller B, Howitt J. A comparative study of oxygen consumption for conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in transfemoral amputees. Clin Rehabil 2008;22:896-901. doi: 10.1177\/0269215508088990.","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215508088990"},{"key":"ref-21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zelik KE, Collins SH, Adamczyk PG, Segal AD, Klute GK, Morgenroth DC, et al. Systematic variation of prosthetic foot spring affects center-of-mass mechanics and metabolic cost during walking. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2011;19:411-9. doi: 10.1109\/TNSRE.2011.2159018.","DOI":"10.1109\/TNSRE.2011.2159018"},{"key":"ref-22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Datta D, Heller B, Howitt J. A comparative evaluation of oxygen consumption and gait pattern in amputees using Intelligent Prostheses and conventionally damped knee swing-phase control. Clin Rehabil 2005;19:398-403. doi: 10.1191\/0269215505cr805oa.","DOI":"10.1191\/0269215505cr805oa"},{"key":"ref-23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Orendurff MS, Segal AD, Klute GK, McDowell ML, Pecoraro JA, Czerniecki JM. Gait efficiency using the C-Leg. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43:239-46. doi: 10.1682\/ jrrd.2005.06.0095.","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2005.06.0095"},{"key":"ref-24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Seelen HAM, Hemmen B, Schmeets AJ, Ament AJHA, Evers SMAA. Costs and consequences of a prosthesis with an electronically stance and swing phase controlled knee joint. Technology and Disability 2009;21:25-34.","DOI":"10.3233\/TAD-2009-0269"},{"key":"ref-25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fuenzalida Squella SA, Kannenberg A, Brand\u00e3o Benetti \u00c2. Enhancement of a prosthetic knee with a microprocessorcontrolled gait phase switch reduces falls and improves balance confidence and gait speed in community ambulators with unilateral transfemoral amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2018;42:228-35. doi: 10.1177\/0309364617716207.","DOI":"10.1177\/0309364617716207"}],"container-title":["Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ftrdergisi.com\/uploads\/pdf\/pdf_4647.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ftrdergisi.com\/uploads\/pdf\/pdf_4647.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,3]],"date-time":"2026-07-03T08:08:32Z","timestamp":1783066112000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ftrdergisi.com\/uploads\/pdf\/pdf_4647.pdf"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,19]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5606\/tftrd.2026.15612","relation":{},"ISSN":["2587-1250"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2587-1250","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,19]]}}}