{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T19:48:04Z","timestamp":1786736884262,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"GN1 Sistemas e Publicacoes Ltd.","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["ABO"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Purpose: To compare patients who underwent scleral fixation using the Yamane technique with and\nwithout simultaneous pars plana vitrectomy. Methods: A total of 37 patients were included in the study.\nEighteen underwent simultaneous pars plana vitrectomy. The Yamane technique alone was performed\nonly in patients with aphakia who had previously undergone pars plana vitrectomy for various reasons.\nFinal lens position, best corrected visual acuity spherical equivalent, complication rates, and optical\ncoherence tomography findings were recorded. Results: The duration of aphakia before intraocular\nlens implantation ranged from 1 month to 21 yr. Postoperative best corrected visual acuity improved\nin both groups, with no statistically significant difference (with pars plana vitrectomy: 0.42 \u00b1 0.34;\nwithout pars plana vitrectomy: 0.32 \u00b1 0.26; p=0.33). The spherical equivalent was also not significantly\ndifferent between groups (with pars plana vitrectomy: 0.29 \u00b1 1.08; without pars plana vitrectomy:\n0.65 \u00b1 2.23; p=0.53). There were no significant differences between the groups in complication rates,\npostoperative intraocular lens position or optical coherence tomography findings. Conclusion: There\nwas no difference in terms of safety or efficacy between the two approaches. Surgical decisions may\nbe based on the surgeon\u2019s experience and the patient\u2019s systemic and ocular condition.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.5935\/0004-2749.2025-0263","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T18:47:20Z","timestamp":1786733240000},"page":"1-4","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison of the Yamane technique with and without simultaneous pars plana vitrectomy: Safety and efficacy analysis"],"prefix":"10.5935","volume":"89","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5537-8778","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mahmut O\u011fuz","family":"Ulusoy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-0199-1141","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Muhammed","family":"Yelkovan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0304-491X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ayna","family":"Sar\u0131yeva-\u0130smayilov","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8503-6306","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Cansu","family":"Erseven","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"3948","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"container-title":["Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.scielo.br\/j\/abo\/a\/nqcpnRTm9Gv9XCrFbLB3xQw\/?lang=en&ilang=en","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T18:47:21Z","timestamp":1786733241000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.scielo.br\/j\/abo\/a\/nqcpnRTm9Gv9XCrFbLB3xQw\/?lang=en&ilang=en"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5935\/0004-2749.2025-0263","relation":{},"ISSN":["0004-2749"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0004-2749","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026]]}}}