{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,27]],"date-time":"2025-10-27T11:00:32Z","timestamp":1761562832569,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON\/CEES)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/BY\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["FME Transactions"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Production scheduling can be affected by many disturbances in the manufacturing system, and consequently, the feasible schedules previously defined became obsolete. Emerging of new technologies associated with Industry 4.0, such as Cyber-Physical Production Systems, as a paradigm of implementation of control and support in decision making, should embed the capacity to simulate different environment scenarios based on the data collected by the manufacturing systems. This paper presents the evaluation of environment dynamics effect on production scheduling, considering three scheduling models and three environment scenarios, through a case study. Results show that environment dynamics affect production schedules, and a very strong or strong positive correlation between environment dynamics scenarios and total completion time with delay, over three scheduling paradigms. Based on these results, the requirement for mandatory inclusion of a module for different environment dynamics scenarios generation and the corresponded simulations, of a Cyber-Physical Production Systems architecture, is confirmed.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.5937\/fme2104827a","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,26]],"date-time":"2021-11-26T19:41:06Z","timestamp":1637955666000},"page":"827-834","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["How environment dynamics affects production scheduling: Requirements for development of CPPS models"],"prefix":"10.5937","volume":"49","author":[{"given":"C\u00e1tia","family":"Alves","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3378-6866","authenticated-orcid":false,"suffix":"D.","given":"Goran","family":"Putnik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Leonilde","family":"Varela","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"3964","reference":[{"key":"ref1","unstructured":"\"Scenario.\" Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https:\/\/www.merriam-webster .com\/dictionary\/scenario. 2021;"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wiendahl, H.-P., ElMaraghy, H.A., Nyhuis, P., Z\u00e4h, M.F., Wiendahl, H.-H., Duffie, N., Brieke, M. Changeable manufacturing-classification, design and operation. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 783-809, 2007;","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cirp.2007.10.003"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vieira, G.E., Herrmann, J.W., and Lin, E. Rescheduling manufacturing systems: a framework of strategies, policies, and methods. Journal of scheduling, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 39-62, 2003;","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1022235519958"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ouelhadj, D., and Petrovic, S. A survey of dynamic scheduling in manufacturing systems. Journal of Scheduling, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 417-431, 2009;","DOI":"10.1007\/s10951-008-0090-8"},{"key":"ref5","unstructured":"Stecca G. Scheduling. In: Chatti S., Laperri\u00e8re L., Reinhart G., Tolio T. (Eds) CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2019;"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Antonelli, D., and Bruno, G. Dynamic distribution of assembly tasks in a collaborative workcell of humans and robots. FME Transactions, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 723-730, 2019;","DOI":"10.5937\/fmet1904723A"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rossit, D. A., Tohme, F., and Frutos, M. Production planning and scheduling in Cyber-Physical Production Systems: a review. International journal of computer integrated manufacturing, Vol. 32, No. 4-5, pp. 385-395, 2019;","DOI":"10.1080\/0951192X.2019.1605199"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lopes, N., Putnik, G., Ferreira, L., and Costa, B. Towards a high performance computing scalable implementation of Cyber Physical Systems. FME Transactions, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 749-756, 2019;","DOI":"10.5937\/fmet1904749L"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nikolakis, N., Senington, R., Sipsas, K., Syberfeldt, A., and Makris, S. On a containerized approach for the dynamic planning and control of a cyberphysical production system. Robotics and computer-integrated manufacturing, Vol. 64, 101919, 2020;","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rcim.2019.101919"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ghaleb, M., Zolfagharinia, H., and Taghipour, S.. Real-time production scheduling in the Industry-4.0 context: Addressing uncertainties in job arrivals and machine breakdowns. Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 123, 105031, 2020;","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cor.2020.105031"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhu, K., and Zhang, Y. A cyber-physical production system framework of smart CNC machining monitoring system. IEEE\/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 2579-2586, 2018;","DOI":"10.1109\/TMECH.2018.2834622"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meissner, H., and Aurich, J.C. Implications of cyber-physical production systems on integrated process planning and scheduling. Procedia manufacturing, Vol. 28, pp. 167-173, 2019;","DOI":"10.1016\/j.promfg.2018.12.027"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jiang, Z., Jin, Y., Mingcheng, E., and Li, Q. Distributed dynamic scheduling for cyber-physical production systems based on a multi-agent system. IEEE Access, Vol. 6, pp. 1855-1869, 2017;","DOI":"10.1109\/ACCESS.2017.2780321"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morariu, C., Morariu, O., R\u0103ileanu, S., and Borangiu, T. Machine learning for predictive scheduling and resource allocation in large scale manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry, Vol. 120, 103244, 2020;","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compind.2020.103244"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shah, V., and Putnik, G.D. Machine learning based manufacturing control system for intelligent cyberphysical systems. FME Transactions, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 802-809, 2019;","DOI":"10.5937\/fmet1904802S"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morariu, C., and Borangiu, T. Time series forecasting for dynamic scheduling of manufacturing processes. In IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics (AQTR), 2018, pp. 1-6. IEEE;","DOI":"10.1109\/AQTR.2018.8402748"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gupta, D., Kumar, V., Ayus, I., Vasudevan, M., and Natarajan, N. Short-term prediction of wind power density using convolutional LSTM network. FME Transactions, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 653-663, 2021;","DOI":"10.5937\/fme2103653G"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prabhu, V.V., and Duffie, N.A. Modelling and analysis of nonlinear dynamics in autonomous heterarchical manufacturing systems control. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 425-428, 1995;","DOI":"10.1016\/S0007-8506(07)62356-7"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scholz-Reiter, B., Freitag, M., and Schmieder, A. Modelling and control of production systems based on nonlinear dynamics theory. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 375-378, 2002;","DOI":"10.1016\/S0007-8506(07)61540-6"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Papakostas, N., Efthymiou, K., Mourtzis, D., and Chryssolouris, G. Modelling the complexity of manufacturing systems using nonlinear dynamics approaches. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 437-440, 2009;","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cirp.2009.03.032"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kozjek, D., Malus, A., Zaletelj, V., and Butala, P. Distributed control with rationally bounded agents in cyber-physical production systems. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology. Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 507-510, 2018;","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cirp.2018.04.037"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abowd G.D., Dey A.K. Towards a Better Understanding of Context and Context-Awareness. In: Gellersen HW. (eds) Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing. HUC 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1707. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 1999;","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-48157-5_29"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Putnik, G.D., Ferreira, L., Lopes, N., and Putnik, Z.: What is a Cyber-Physical System: Definitions and models spectrum. FME Transactions, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 663-674, 2019;","DOI":"10.5937\/fmet1904663P"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alves, C., and Putnik, G.D. Cyber-Physical Production System (CPPS) decision making duration time impact on manufacturing system performance. FME Transactions, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 675-682, 2019;","DOI":"10.5937\/fmet1904675A"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Galaske, N., Anderl, R. Disruption management for resilient processes in cyber-physical production systems. Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 442-447, 2016;","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procir.2016.04.144"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ribeiro, L. Cyber-physical production systems' design challenges. In IEEE 26th international symposium on industrial electronics (ISIE), 2017, pp. 1189-1194. IEEE;","DOI":"10.1109\/ISIE.2017.8001414"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Monostori, L., K\u00e1d\u00e1r, B., Bauernhansl, T., Kondoh, S., Kumara, S., Reinhart, G., ... and Ueda, K. Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. Cirp Annals, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 621-641, 2016;","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cirp.2016.06.005"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Antao, L., Pinto, R., Reis, J., and Gon\u00e7alves, G. Requirements for testing and validating the industrial internet of things. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW), 2018, April, pp. 110-115. IEEE;","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSTW.2018.00036"}],"container-title":["FME Transactions"],"original-title":["Okru\u017eenja uti\u010de na programiranja proizvodnje - zahtevi za razvoj modela Sajber-Fizi\u010dkih Proizvodnih Sistema (SFPS)"],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs\/data\/pdf\/1451-2092\/2021\/1451-20922104827A.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,26]],"date-time":"2021-11-26T19:46:43Z","timestamp":1637956003000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/scindeks.ceon.rs\/Article.aspx?artid=1451-20922104827A"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5937\/fme2104827a","relation":{},"ISSN":["1451-2092","2406-128X"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1451-2092"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2406-128X"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]}}}