{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,26]],"date-time":"2025-04-26T04:40:07Z","timestamp":1745642407548,"version":"3.40.4"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Japanese Urological Association","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Jpn. j. urol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,20]]},"DOI":"10.5980\/jpnjurol.115.53","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,19]],"date-time":"2025-04-19T22:07:11Z","timestamp":1745100431000},"page":"53-63","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFECT OF TRANSVAGINAL MESH SURGERY USING ORIHIME&lt;sup&gt;\u00ae&lt;\/sup&gt; MESH AND LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY AT 1 YEAR POSTOPERATIVELY -TVM HAS A FAVORABLE POSTOPERATIVE COURSE COMPARED TO LSC IN PATIENTS WITH POP SCORED \u2264 STAGE 3-","ORIHIME&lt;sup&gt;\u24c7&lt;\/sup&gt;\u3092\u7528\u3044\u305f\u7d4c\u815f\u30e1\u30c3\u30b7\u30e5\u624b\u8853\uff08TVM\uff09\u3068\u8179\u8154\u93e1\u4e0b\u4ed9\u9aa8\u815f\u56fa\u5b9a\u8853\u306e\u8853\u5f8c1\u5e74\u6210\u7e3e\u306e\u6bd4\u8f03\u2015POP-Q stage 3\u4ee5\u4e0b\u306e\u9aa8\u76e4\u81d3\u5668\u8131\u306b\u304a\u3051\u308bTVM\u306e\u826f\u597d\u306a\u6210\u7e3e\u2015"],"prefix":"10.5980","volume":"115","author":[{"given":"Kenji","family":"Kuroda","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College Hospital"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Koetsu","family":"Hamamoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College Hospital"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kazuki","family":"Kawamura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College Hospital"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Akio","family":"Horiguchi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College Hospital"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Keiichi","family":"Ito","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College Hospital"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"4001","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"1) Subak LL, Waetjen LE, Van Den, Eeden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E and Brown JS: Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet. Gynecol., 98, 646-651, 2001.","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200110000-00021"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"2) Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC and Clark AL: Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet. Gynecol., 89, 501-506, 1997.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"3) Obinata D, Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Mochida J, Yamaguchi K, Murata Y, Yoshizawa T, Matsui T, Matsui H, Sasabuchi Y, Fujimura T, Homma Y and Takahashi S: Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database. Int. J. Urol., 25, 655-659, 2018.","DOI":"10.1111\/iju.13587"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"4) Shah HN and Badlani GH: Mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery and their management: A systematic review. Indian. J. of Urol., 28, 129-153, 2012.","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-1591.98453"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"5) Baessler K: Do we need meshes in pelvic floor reconstruction? World. J. Urol., 30, 479-486, 2012.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-011-0794-9"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"6) Maher CF, Feiner B, Decuyper EM, Nichlos CJ, Hickey KV and O&apos;Rourke P: Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: A randomized trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 204, 360. e1-7, 2011.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.016"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"7) Liu CK, Tsai CP, Chou MM, Shen PS, Chen GD, Hung YC and Hung MJ: A comparative study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and total vaginal mesh procedure using lightweight polypropylene meshes for prolapse repair. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 53, 552-558, 2014.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2014.07.006"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"8) Wei D, Wang P, Niu X and Zhao X: Comparison between laparoscopic uterus\/sacrocolpopexy and total pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 45, 915-922, 2019.","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13908"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"9) Kanasaki H, Oride A, Hara T and Kyo S: Comparative Retrospective Study of Tension-Free Vaginal Mesh Surgery, Native Tissue Repair, and Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair. Obstet. Gynecol. Int., 7367403, 2020.","DOI":"10.1155\/2020\/7367403"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"10) Takazawa N, Fujisaki A, Yoshimura Y, Tsujimura A and Horie S: Short-term outcomes of the transvaginal minimal mesh procedure for pelvic organ prolapse. Investig. Clin. Urol., 59, 133-140, 2018.","DOI":"10.4111\/icu.2018.59.2.133"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"11) Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, Frappell J, Bombieri L, Moran P, Slack M, Scott P and Waterfield P: A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int. Urogynecol. J., 24, 377-384, 2013.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1885-x"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"12) Khan A, Alperin M, Wu N, Clemens JQ, Dubina E, Pashos CL and Anger JT: Comparative outcomes of open versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy among medicare beneficiaries. Int. Urogynecol. J., 24, 1883-1891, 2013.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2088-9"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"13) Yesil A, Watermann D and Farthmann J: Mesh implantation for pelvic organ prolapse improves quality of life. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 289, 817-821, 2014.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-013-3052-0"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"14) Costantini E and Lazzeri M: What part does mesh play in urogenital prolapse management today? Curr. Opin. Urol., 25, 300-304, 2015.","DOI":"10.1097\/MOU.0000000000000177"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"15) Takeyama M, Kuwata T, Kato C, Kashihara H, Watanabe M, Kinoshita R and Hirota M: Is transvaginal mesh procedure a potential measure for pelvic organ prolapse repair when performed by expert surgeons? Int. J. Urol., 29, 435-440, 2022.","DOI":"10.1111\/iju.14804"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"16) Obinata D, Yamaguchi K, Hashimoto S, Yoshizawa T, Mochida J and Takahashi S: Tension-free vaginal mesh for patients with pelvic organ prolapse: mid-term functional outcomes. J. Int. Med. Res., 50, 2022.","DOI":"10.1177\/03000605221106434"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"17) Takahashi S, Obinata D, Sakuma T, Nagane Y, Sato K, Mochida J, Ichinose T and Yamaguchi K: Tension-free vaginal mesh procedure for pelvic organ prolapse: A single-center experience of 310 cases with 1-year follow up. Int. J. Urol., 17, 353-358, 2010.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-2042.2010.02469.x"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"18) Aub\u00e9 M, Gu\u00e9rin M, Rheaume C and Tu LM: Efficacy and patient satisfaction of pelvic organ prolapse reduction using transvaginal mesh: A Canadian perspective. Can. Urol. Assoc. J., 12, 432-437, 2018.","DOI":"10.5489\/cuaj.5095"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"19) Kuwata T, Watanabe M, Kashihara H, Kato C and Takeyama M: Histopathological considerations of transvaginally implanted polytetrafluoroethylene mesh in human biological tissues. Continence. Reports., 7, 100033, 2023.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contre.2023.100033"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"20) \u4e2d\u7530\u771f\u6728, \u4e0a\u5cf6\u5343\u6625: \u4f53\u5185\u306b\u57cb\u3081\u8fbc\u307e\u308c\u305fPTFE\u88fd\u53ca\u3073PP\u88fd\u306e\u624b\u8853\u7528\u30e1\u30c3\u30b7\u30e5\u306b\u5bfe\u3059\u308b\u30e9\u30c3\u30c8\u306e\u7d50\u5408\u7d44\u7e54\u306e\u5c40\u6240\u53cd\u5fdc\u306e\u5dee\u7570. \u65e5\u672c\u5973\u6027\u9aa8\u76e4\u5e95\u533b\u5b66\u4f1a\u8a8c, 18, 72-79, 2022.","DOI":"10.32310\/jfpfm.18.1_72"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"21) Jacquetin B, Fatton B, Rosenthal C, Clav\u00e9 H, Debodinance P, Hinoul P, Gauld J, Garbin O, Berrocal J, Villet R, Liz\u00e9e DS and Cosson M: Total transvaginal mesh (TVM) technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: A 3-year prospective follow-up study. Int. Urogynecol. J., 21, 1455-1462, 2010.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1223-0"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"22) Ker CR, Lin KL, Loo ZX, Juan YS and Long CY: Comparison of Uphold TM Vaginal Mesh Procedure with Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Sci. Rep., 8, 1-7, 2018.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-018-27765-8"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"23) Kawaguchi S, Narimoto K, Urata S, Takeyama M, Kadono Y and Mizokami A: Predictors of persistent stress urinary incontinence after transvaginal mesh repair. BMC. Womens. Health., 18, 174, 2018.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12905-018-0667-0"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"24) Park YH, Yang SC, Park ST, Park SH and Kim HB: Laparoscopic reconstructive surgery is superior to vaginal reconstruction in the pelvic organ prolapse. Int. J. Med. Sci., 11, 1082-1088, 2014.","DOI":"10.7150\/ijms.9027"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"25) Ek M, Tegerstedt G, Falconer C, Kjaeldgaard A, Rezapour M, Rudnicki M and Altman D: Urodynamic assessment of anterior vaginal wall surgery: A randomized comparison between colporraphy and transvaginal mesh. Neurourol. Urodyn., 29, 527-531, 2010.","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20811"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"26) Kasturi S, Diaz SI, McDermott CD, Woodman PJ, Bump RC, Terry CL and Douglass SH: De novo stress urinary incontinence after negative prolapse reduction stress testing for total vaginal mesh procedures: Incidence and risk factors. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 205, 487 e1-e4, 2011.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.07.006"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"27) Kuribayashi M, Kitagawa Y, Narimoto K, Urata S, Kawaguchi S and Namiki M: Predictor of de novo stress urinary incontinence following TVM procedure: A further analysis of preoperative voiding function. Int. Urogynecol. J., 24, 407-411, 2013.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1882-0"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"28) Leruth J, Fillet M and Waltregny D: Incidence and risk factors of postoperative stress urinary incontinence following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in patients with negative preoperative prolapse reduction stress testing. Int. Urogynecol. J., 24, 485-491, 2013.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1888-7"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"29) Lo TS, Al-Kharabsheh AM, Tan YL, Pue LB, Hsieh WC and Uy-Patrimonio MC: Single incision anterior apical mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in pelvic prolapse surgery at 36 months follow-up. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 56, 793-800, 2017.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2017.10.016"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"30) Lo TS, Ibrahim R, Karim N bt, Nawawi EA and Uy-Patrimonio MC: Trans-vaginal mesh surgery for management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse following abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 57, 311-314, 2018.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2018.02.023"}],"container-title":["The Japanese Journal of Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/jpnjurol\/115\/2\/115_53\/_pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,26]],"date-time":"2025-04-26T04:05:27Z","timestamp":1745640327000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/jpnjurol\/115\/2\/115_53\/_article\/-char\/ja\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,20]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5980\/jpnjurol.115.53","relation":{},"ISSN":["0021-5287","1884-7110"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0021-5287"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1884-7110"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,20]]}}}