{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]],"date-time":"2026-07-29T08:10:15Z","timestamp":1785312615813,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Baskent University","issue":"Supp 2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Exp Clin Transplant"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]},"DOI":"10.6002\/ect.mesot2025.p72","type":"journal-issue","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,28]],"date-time":"2026-07-28T11:13:27Z","timestamp":1785237207000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":[],"prefix":"10.6002","volume":"24","member":"4021","reference":[{"key":"ref0","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"1. Grigorescu M, Kemmner S, Sch\u00f6nermarck U, et al. Disqualification of donor and recipient candidates from the living kidney donation program: experience of a single-center in Germany. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:904795. doi:10.3389\/fmed.2022.904795","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2022.904795"},{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"2. Altheaby A, Almukhlifi A, Aldoukhi A, et al. Why living kidney donor candidates are turned down? A single-center cohort study. Cureus. 2020;12(8):e9877. doi:10.7759\/cureus.9877","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.9877"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"3. Lum EL, Shen JI, Beaumont JL, et al. Multiple reasons for living donor denial: a single center experience. Clin Transplant. 2020;34(5):e13812. doi:10.1111\/ctr.13812","DOI":"10.1111\/ctr.13812"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"4. Inoue K, Hori S, Tomizawa M, et al. Detailed cause of donor ineligibility in living donor kidney transplants: a retrospective, single-center cohort study. Transplant Proc. 2024;56(1):10-15. doi:10.1016\/j.transproceed.2023.11.027","DOI":"10.1016\/j.transproceed.2023.11.027"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"5. Kumar R, Hafeez AR, Mangi I, Ali T, Lashari S, Waqar T. Factors responsible for nonselection of donors in living related kidney transplantation. Exp Clin Transplant. 2024;22(7):509-513. doi:10.6002\/ect.2024.0112","DOI":"10.6002\/ect.2024.0112"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"6. Kasiske BL, Ahn YS, Conboy M, et al. Outcomes of living kidney donor candidate evaluations in the living donor collective pilot registry. Transplant Direct. 2021;7(5):e689. doi:10.1097\/TXD.0000000000001143","DOI":"10.1097\/TXD.0000000000001143"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"7. Abderrahim E, Zammouri A, Bacha MM, et al. Thirty years of experience at the first Tunisian kidney transplant center. Exp Clin Transplant. 2017;15(Suppl 1):84-89. doi:10.6002\/ect.mesot2016.O66","DOI":"10.6002\/ect.mesot2016.O66"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"8. Lentine KL, Kasiske BL, Levey AS, et al. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors. Transplantation. 2017;101(8S Suppl 1):S1-S109. doi:10.1097\/TP.0000000000001769","DOI":"10.1097\/TP.0000000000001769"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"9. Lapasia JB, Kong SY, Busque S, Scandling JD, Chertow GM, Tan JC. Living donor evaluation and exclusion: the Stanford experience. Clin Transplant. 2011;25(5):697-704. doi:10.1111\/j.1399-0012.2010.01336.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-0012.2010.01336.x"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"10. Dayal C, Davies M, Diana NE, Meyers A. Living kidney donation in a developing country. PLoS One. 2022;17(5):e0268183. doi:10.1371\/journal.pone.0268183","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0268183"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"11. Ikidag MA, Uysal E. Evaluation of vascular structures of living donor kidneys by multislice computed tomography angiography before transplant surgery: is arterial phase sufficient for determination of both arteries and veins? J Belg Soc Radiol. 2019;103(1):23. doi:10.5334\/jbsr.1719","DOI":"10.5334\/jbsr.1719"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"12. Lafranca JA, van Bruggen M, Kimenai HJ, et al. Vascular multiplicity should not be a contra-indication for live kidney donation and transplantation. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153460. doi:10.1371\/journal.pone.0153460","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0153460"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"13. Chumdermpadetsuk RR, Montalvan A, Canizares S, et al. A single-center retrospective study to identify causes of sex differences in the living kidney donor evaluation process. Kidney360. 2024;5(12):1893. doi:10.34067\/KID.0000000581","DOI":"10.34067\/KID.0000000581"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"14. Garg N, Lentine KL, Inker LA, et al. Metabolic, cardiovascular, and substance use evaluation of living kidney donor candidates: US practices in 2017. Am J Transplant. 2020;20(12):3390-3400. doi:10.1111\/ajt.15964","DOI":"10.1111\/ajt.15964"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"15. Kezi\u0107 A, Kova\u010devi\u0107 S, Marinkovi\u0107 J, et al. Comparison of accepted and unaccepted living kidney donors: one-center experience. Ren Fail. 2018;40(1):152-159. doi:10.1080\/0886022X.2018.1450758","DOI":"10.1080\/0886022X.2018.1450758"}],"container-title":["Experimental and Clinical Transplantation"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]],"date-time":"2026-07-29T07:56:01Z","timestamp":1785311761000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ectrx.org\/detail\/supplement\/2026\/24\/6\/2\/304\/0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"Supp 2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6002\/ect.mesot2025.p72","relation":{},"ISSN":["1304-0855","2146-8427"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1304-0855","type":"print"},{"value":"2146-8427","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]}}}