{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,19]],"date-time":"2026-01-19T22:44:28Z","timestamp":1768862668585,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Biomedical Informatics","issue":"12","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Bioinformation"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Cesarean section is a typical surgical practice whereby a good uterine closure is essential for maternal outcomes. Conventional suturing involves knot-tying, which may take long and may weaken the integrity of tissues. This study involves a comparison between knotless barbed sutures (KBS) and the use of conventional sutures (CS) to close the uterus in case of cesarean delivery. In an 80-women prospective comparative trial, KBS decreased the uterine incision closure time (8.58 \u00b1 1.18 min vs. 10.18 \u00b1 1.81 min, p=0.002) and total closure time (27.77 \u00b1 4.73 min vs. 30.95 \u00b1 3.08 min, p=0.001) significantly. The extra hemostatic sutures required were significantly reduced in KBS (5% vs. 27.5, p=0.006). The thickness of the scar at 6 weeks (4.23 \u00b1 0.90 mm vs. 3.54 \u00b1 0.60 mm, p&lt;0.001), was larger in the KBS. Knotless barbed sutures have considerable benefits on efficiency of operations, hemostasis and tissue healing of cesarean uterine closure.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.6026\/973206300214929","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,19]],"date-time":"2026-01-19T10:15:56Z","timestamp":1768817756000},"page":"4929-4933","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Efficacy of knotless barbed versus conventional sutures for uterine closure during cesarean section: A prospective comparative study"],"prefix":"10.6026","volume":"21","author":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MTH Hospital, Indore Madhya Pradesh, India","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Akanksha Lamba","family":"Thora","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ankita","family":"Pawar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MTH Hospital, Indore Madhya Pradesh, India","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anupama","family":"Dave","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MTH Women's Hospital, MGM Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"4070","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]]},"container-title":["Bioinformation"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,19]],"date-time":"2026-01-19T10:15:57Z","timestamp":1768817757000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.bioinformation.net\/021\/973206300214929.htm"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6026\/973206300214929","relation":{},"ISSN":["0973-8894","0973-2063"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0973-8894","type":"print"},{"value":"0973-2063","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]]}}}