{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,7]],"date-time":"2026-05-07T06:12:17Z","timestamp":1778134337002,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Biomedical Informatics","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Bioinformation"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Although ultrasound-guided procedures (USGP) are widely adopted to reduce technical complications, the relationship between patient satisfaction and procedural safety remains insufficiently explored. Most studies emphasise technical success while under-evaluating patient-reported outcomes as potential indicators of safety performance. Hence, this cross-sectional study assessed satisfaction among 300 adults undergoing USGP and examined its association with documented complication rates. A structured questionnaire evaluated comfort, communication, perceived safety and willingness for repeat procedures using a 10-point Likert scale. Among 270 respondents (90% response rate), the mean satisfaction score was 8.2 \u00b1 1.1. Overall complication incidence was 2.2%, predominantly minor events. Patients with high satisfaction (\u22659\/10) demonstrated significantly lower complication rates compared with low satisfaction groups (0.7% versus 6.3%, p = 0.03). Satisfaction score independently predicted complication likelihood after adjustment for age and procedural complexity (\u03b2 = \u20130.21, p = 0.01). Thus, we show that patient satisfaction may function as an adjunct safety indicator rather than mere experiential metric. Incorporating structured satisfaction assessment into procedural quality frameworks may enhance both patient-centred care and safety monitoring.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.6026\/973206300221929","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,7]],"date-time":"2026-05-07T05:25:50Z","timestamp":1778131550000},"page":"1929-1933","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Patient satisfaction and complication rates in ultrasound-guided procedures: A questionnaire-based analysis"],"prefix":"10.6026","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Bhagya Sree","family":"Velamala","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Acute Medicine, Betsi Cadwaldr University Health Board, Wales, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zainab Haider","family":"Khan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Medicine, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad Cura\u00e7ao"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Siddiqui","family":"R.A","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pharmacology, NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences & RC and LMH, Nagpur, India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Aisha Mohammed","family":"Kutty","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oncology and Haematology, Portsmouth University Hospital NHS trust, Wessex, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"4070","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]]},"container-title":["Bioinformation"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,7]],"date-time":"2026-05-07T05:25:52Z","timestamp":1778131552000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.bioinformation.net\/022\/973206300221929.htm"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6026\/973206300221929","relation":{},"ISSN":["0973-8894","0973-2063"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0973-8894","type":"print"},{"value":"0973-2063","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]]}}}