{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,12]],"date-time":"2026-08-12T06:31:13Z","timestamp":1786516273699,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Danish Medical Association","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Dan Med J"],"abstract":"<jats:p>INTRODUCTION. The Danish RETROSHOCK registry has provided valuable insights into patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) and their clinical trajectories. However, continuously updating the registry through manual chart review is time-consuming.\n\nMETHODS. Electronic medical records were retrieved from patients admitted to Odense University Hospital from 2018 to 2022, assigned an ICD-10 code suggestive of AMICS. A random sample of 100 consecutive patients was selected for testing the AI-assisted chart review. The AI tool was a natural language processing model identifying AMICS-related keywords. Electronic medical records were initially screened using AI-assisted chart review, with time recorded until AMICS diagnosis or exclusion due to an alternative diagnosis. One week later, a manual chart review was performed. AI-assisted and manual screening times were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.\n\nRESULTS. AI-assisted chart review identified the same 26 AMICS patients as manual review (Cohen\u2019s kappa = 1). Median manual inclusion time was 2:20 minutes, compared with 1:16 minutes with AI-assisted chart review (p &lt; 0.001). Median manual exclusion time was 2:45 minutes, and AI-assisted exclusion was 0:59 minutes (p &lt; 0.001).\n\nCONCLUSIONS. AI-assisted chart review significantly reduced screening time for including AMICS patients in the RETROSHOCK registry and excluding non-eligible patients, while preserving diagnostic accuracy.\n\nFUNDING. The RETROSHOCK database is supported by Johnson &amp; Johnson Med Tech and the Novo Nordic Foundation.\n\nTRIAL REGISTRATION. Not relevant.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.61409\/a10250874","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,7]],"date-time":"2026-05-07T05:52:26Z","timestamp":1778133146000},"page":"1-5","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Evaluation of AI-assisted chart review for acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock"],"prefix":"10.61409","author":[{"given":"Karoline Korsholm","family":"Jeppesen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rasmus Bo","family":"Lindhardt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anika","family":"Klein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emma","family":"Illum","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rasmus Bank","family":"Lynggaard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ann","family":"Banke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jacob Eifer","family":"M\u00f8ller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hanne Berg","family":"Ravn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pernille Just","family":"Vinholt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"40208","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref0","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Helgestad OKL, Josiassen J, Hassager C, et al. Temporal trends in incidence and patient characteristics in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction from 2010 to 2017: a Danish cohort study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(11):1370-1378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ejhf.1566","DOI":"10.1002\/ejhf.1566"},{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Davodian LW, Larsen JKP, Povlsen AL, et al. Timing and causes of death in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (from the RETROSHOCK cohort). Am J Cardiol. 2022;171:15-22. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amjcard.2022.01.050","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2022.01.050"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Helgestad OKL, Josiassen J, Hassager C, et al. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock. Open Heart. 2020;7(1):e001214. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/openhrt-2019-001214","DOI":"10.1136\/openhrt-2019-001214"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kunkel JB, Josiassen J, Helgestad OKL, et al. Inflammatory response by 48 h after admission and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2023;12(5):306-314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ehjacc\/zuad018","DOI":"10.1093\/ehjacc\/zuad018"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Josiassen J, Helgestad OKL, M\u00f8ller JE, et al. Hemodynamic and metabolic recovery in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock is more rapid among patients presenting with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. PLoS One. 2020;15(12):e0244294. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0244294","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0244294"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schmidt M, Schmidt SAJ, Sandegaard JL, et al. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449-490. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/CLEP.S91125","DOI":"10.2147\/CLEP.S91125"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sundb\u00f8ll J, Adelborg K, Munch T, et al. Positive predictive value of cardiovascular diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry: a validation study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e012832. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-012832","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-012832"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lauridsen MD, Gammelager H, Schmidt M, et al. Positive predictive value of International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, diagnosis codes for cardiogenic, hypovolemic, and septic shock in the Danish National Patient Registry. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:23. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12874-015-0013-2","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-015-0013-2"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kolte D, Khera S, Aronow WS, et al. Trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(1):e000590. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/JAHA.113.000590","DOI":"10.1161\/JAHA.113.000590"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Redfors B, Anger\u00e5s O, R\u00e5munddal T, et al. 17-year trends in incidence and prognosis of cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction in western Sweden. Int J Cardiol. 2015;185:256-262. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijcard.2015.03.106","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijcard.2015.03.106"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Laursen MS, Pedersen JS, Vinholt PJ, et al. Benchmark for evaluation of Danish clinical word embeddings. NEJLT. 2023;9(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3384\/nejlt.2000-1533.2023.4132","DOI":"10.3384\/nejlt.2000-1533.2023.4132"}],"container-title":["Danish Medical Journal"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,12]],"date-time":"2026-08-12T05:57:15Z","timestamp":1786514235000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/ugeskriftet.dk\/dmj\/A10250874"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]},"references-count":11,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.61409\/a10250874","relation":{},"ISSN":["2245-1919"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2245-1919","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]}}}