{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T10:44:51Z","timestamp":1791888291680,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Grupo Editorial Psicofundaci\u00f3n","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Psicothema"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,5]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"abstract":"<title>Abstract: <\/title>\n\t\t\t\t<sec>\n\t\t\t\t\t<title>Introduction: <\/title>\n\t\t\t\t\t<p>Validity is a fundamental aspect of psychological assessment because it examines the extent to which interpretations of the scores produced by an instrument support its intended purpose. While validation studies are frequently conducted, they often emphasize specific phases or validation methods, such as pilot testing or expert judgments, while neglecting current additional sources of validity evidence that could improve an instrument\u2019s psychometric properties. This limitation is partly due to a lack of detailed easy-to-use guidelines, which make validation processes inaccessible to non-expert researchers and practitioners. Additionally, the traditional focus on quantitative methods often overlooks the potential benefits of complementary approaches to validation that will help people design more comprehensive validation studies. <\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/sec>\n\t\t\t\t<sec>\n\t\t\t\t\t<title>Method: <\/title>\n\t\t\t\t\t<p>To address these challenges, the present study introduces PROVAL, a nine-step protocol designed to guide researchers in conducting validation studies. <\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/sec>\n\t\t\t\t<sec>\n\t\t\t\t\t<title>Results: <\/title>\n\t\t\t\t\t<p>PROVAL promotes a reflective approach to help researchers and practitioners identify and prioritize the most important sources of validity evidence for their specific validation requirements. <\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/sec>\n\t\t\t\t<sec>\n\t\t\t\t\t<title>Conclusions: <\/title>\n\t\t\t\t\t<p>An illustrative application of PROVAL is presented, demonstrating its usefulness in optimizing resources and ensuring instruments effectively fulfill their intended purposes.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/sec><\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.70478\/psicothema.2026.38.18","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T09:47:31Z","timestamp":1791884851000},"page":"195-203","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["PROVAL: A Comprehensive Protocol for Developing Validation Studies"],"prefix":"10.70478","volume":"38","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0141-0816","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Isabel","family":"Ben\u00edtez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Granada","place":["Spain"]},{"name":"Brain and behavior Research Center","place":["Spain"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5134-8363","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Andr\u00e9s","family":"Gonz\u00e1lez-G\u00f3mez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Granada","place":["Spain"]},{"name":"Brain and behavior Research Center","place":["Spain"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4163-0001","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Jos\u00e9 Luis","family":"Padilla","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Granada","place":["Spain"]},{"name":"Brain and behavior Research Center","place":["Spain"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"51243","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref0","year":"1999","unstructured":"American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing<\/italic>. American Educational Research Association.","journal-title":"Standards for educational and psychological testing"},{"key":"ref1","year":"2014","unstructured":"American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (Eds.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing<\/italic>. American Educational Research Association.","journal-title":"Standards for educational and psychological testing"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-56129-5_4","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chen, M. Y., & Zumbo, B. D. (2017). Ecological framework of item responding as validity evidence: An application of multilevel DIF modeling using PISA data. In B.D. Zumbo & A.M. Hubley (Eds.), Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research<\/italic> (pp. 53-68). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-56129-5_4<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research"},{"issue":"3","key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1177\/0013164407310130","article-title":"Sources of validity evidence for educational and psychological tests","volume":"68","year":"2008","unstructured":"Cizek, G. J., Rosenberg, S. L., & Koons, H. H. (2008). Sources of validity evidence for educational and psychological tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement<\/italic>, 68<\/italic>(3), 397-412. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0013164407310130<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Educational and Psychological Measurement"},{"issue":"6","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.1111\/medu.12678","article-title":"A contemporary approach to validity arguments: A practical guide to Kane\u2019s framework","volume":"49","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cook, D. A., Brydges, R., Ginsburg, S., & Hatala, R. (2015). A contemporary approach to validity arguments: A practical guide to Kane\u2019s framework. Medical Education<\/italic>, 49<\/italic>(6), 560-575. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/medu.12678<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Medical Education"},{"key":"ref5","year":"2011","unstructured":"Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research<\/italic>. Sage Publications.","journal-title":"Designing and conducting mixed methods research"},{"key":"ref6","year":"1986","unstructured":"Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory<\/italic>. ERIC.","journal-title":"Introduction to classical and modern test theory"},{"issue":"4","key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1037\/h0040957","article-title":"Construct validity in psychological tests","volume":"52","year":"1955","unstructured":"Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin<\/italic>, 52<\/italic>(4), 281-302. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0040957<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Psychological Bulletin"},{"issue":"4","key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1177\/1558689807306147","article-title":"Toward a unified validation framework in mixed methods research","volume":"1","year":"2007","unstructured":"Dellinger, A. B., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Toward a unified validation framework in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research<\/italic>, 1(4), 309-332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1558689807306147<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Journal of Mixed Methods Research"},{"key":"ref9","year":"2025","unstructured":"European Federation of Psychologists\u2019 Associations AISBL (EFPA). (2025). Model for the review, description and evaluation of psychological and educational tests (Test review model)<\/italic>. https:\/\/www.efpa.eu\/<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Model for the review, description and evaluation of psychological and educational tests (Test review model)"},{"issue":"10","key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.01131","article-title":"Validating test score interpretations using time information","year":"2019","unstructured":"Engelhardt, L., & Goldhammer, F. (2019). Validating test score interpretations using time information. Frontiers in Psychology<\/italic>, 10<\/italic>, Article 1131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.01131<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Frontiers in Psychology"},{"key":"ref11","first-page":"87","year":"1998","unstructured":"Harkness, J., & Schoua-Glusberg, A. (1998). Questionnaires in translation. In J. Harkness (Ed.), Cross-cultural survey equivalence<\/italic> (pp. 87-126). Zentrum f\u00fcr Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen -ZUMA-. https:\/\/www.ssoar.info\/ssoar\/handle\/document\/49733<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Cross-cultural survey equivalence"},{"issue":"3","key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1027\/1015-5759\/a000664","article-title":"On consequential validity","volume":"37","year":"2021","unstructured":"Iliescu, D., & Greiff, S. (2021). On consequential validity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment<\/italic>, 37<\/italic>(3), 163-166. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1027\/1015-5759\/a000664<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment"},{"key":"ref13","year":"2017","unstructured":"International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (Second edition)<\/italic>. [http:\/\/www.InTestCom.org<\/ext-link>]","journal-title":"."},{"key":"ref14","year":"2019","unstructured":"Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches<\/italic>. Sage publications.","journal-title":"Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches"},{"issue":"7","key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.3102\/0013189X033007014","article-title":"Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come","volume":"33","year":"2004","unstructured":"Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher<\/italic>, 33<\/italic>(7), 14-26. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3102\/0013189X033007014<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Educational Researcher"},{"issue":"3","key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.112.3.527","article-title":"An argument-based approach to validity","volume":"112","year":"1992","unstructured":"Kane, M. T. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity.Psychological Bulletin<\/italic>, 112<\/italic>(3), 527-535.https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-2909.112.3.527<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Psychological Bulletin"},{"key":"ref17","first-page":"17","year":"2006","unstructured":"Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation In R.L. Breenan (Ed.), Educational Measurement<\/italic> (pp. 17-64). American Council on Education and Praeger.","journal-title":"Educational Measurement"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/jedm.12000","article-title":"Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores","volume":"50","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kane, M. T. (2013a). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement<\/italic>, 50<\/italic>(1), 1-73. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jedm.12000<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Journal of Educational Measurement"},{"issue":"50","key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1115","DOI":"10.2307\/23353803","article-title":"Validation as a pragmatic, scientific activity","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kane, M. (2013b). Validation as a pragmatic, scientific activity. Journal of Educational Measurement<\/italic>, 50<\/italic>, 1115-1122. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/23353803<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Journal of Educational Measurement"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.7334\/psicothema2013.258","article-title":"Validity evidence based on testing consequences","volume":"26","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lane, S. (2014). Validity evidence based on testing consequences. Psicothema<\/italic>, 26<\/italic>(1), 127-135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7334\/psicothema2013.258<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Psicothema"},{"key":"ref21","first-page":"191","year":"2025","unstructured":"Lane, S., & Marion, S. F. (2025). Validity and validation. In L. L. Cook & M. J. Pitoniak (Eds.), Educational measurement<\/italic> (5th ed., pp. 191-275). Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oso\/9780197654965.003.0004<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Educational measurement"},{"issue":"8","key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.3102\/0013189X07311286","article-title":"A suggested change in terminology and emphasis regarding validity and education","volume":"36","year":"2007","unstructured":"Lissitz, R. W., & Samuelsen, K. (2007). A suggested change in terminology and emphasis regarding validity and education. Educational Researcher<\/italic>, 36<\/italic>(8), 437-448. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3102\/0013189X07311286<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Educational Researcher"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.46381\/reic.v20i2.657","article-title":"Estudio psicom\u00e9trico de una escala sobre actitudes hacia la igualdad de g\u00e9nero con mujeres reclusas","volume":"20","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lorenzo Moledo, M., Quiroga-Carrillo, A., & Ferraces Otero, M. J. (2023). Estudio psicom\u00e9trico de una escala sobre actitudes hacia la igualdad de g\u00e9nero con mujeres reclusas. Revista Espa\u00f1ola de Investigaci\u00f3n Criminol\u00f3gica<\/italic>, 20<\/italic>(2), Article e657. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.46381\/reic.v20i2.657<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Revista Espa\u00f1ola de Investigaci\u00f3n Criminol\u00f3gica"},{"key":"ref24","first-page":"13","year":"1989","unstructured":"Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn (Ed), Educational Measurement<\/italic> (pp. 13-103). American Council on Education and Macmillan.","journal-title":"Educational Measurement"},{"issue":"7","key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006","article-title":"The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes","volume":"63","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter LM, & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology<\/italic>,63<\/italic>(7), 737-745. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006<\/ext-link>.","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"},{"issue":"5","key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1080\/13645579.2015.1049448","article-title":"Incorporating eye tracking into cognitive interviewing to pretest survey questions","volume":"19","year":"2016","unstructured":"Neuert, C. E., & Lenzner, T. (2016). Incorporating eye tracking into cognitive interviewing to pretest survey questions. International Journal of Social Research Methodology<\/italic>, 19<\/italic>(5), 501-519. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13645579.2015.1049448<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"International Journal of Social Research Methodology"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.7334\/psicothema2013.257","article-title":"Demonstrating the validity of three general scores of PET in predicting higher education achievement in Israel","volume":"26","year":"2014","unstructured":"Oren, C., Kennet-Cohen, T., & Turval, E. (2014). Demonstrating the validity of three general scores of PET in predicting higher education achievement in Israel. Psicothema<\/italic>, 26<\/italic>(1), 117-126. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7334\/psicothema2013.257<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Psicothema"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.7334\/psicothema2013.259","article-title":"Validity evidence based on response processes","volume":"26","year":"2014","unstructured":"Padilla, J.L., & Ben\u00edtez, I. (2014). Validity evidence based on response processes. Psicothema<\/italic>, 26<\/italic>(1), 136-144. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7334\/psicothema2013.259<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Psicothema"},{"issue":"5","key":"ref29","first-page":"477","article-title":"Influence of age, gender, and context on attitudes toward sexist\/nonsexist language: Is sport a special case?","volume":"38","year":"1998","unstructured":"Parks, J. B., & Roberton, M. A. (1998). Influence of age, gender, and context on attitudes toward sexist\/nonsexist language: Is sport a special case? Sex Roles<\/italic>, 38<\/italic>(5), 477-494. https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1023\/A:1018766023667<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Sex Roles"},{"issue":"42","key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007002422225","article-title":"Development and validation of an instrument to measure attitudes toward sexist\/nonsexist language","year":"2000","unstructured":"Parks, J. B., & Roberton, M. A. (2000). Development and validation of an instrument to measure attitudes toward sexist\/nonsexist language. Sex Roles<\/italic>, 42<\/italic>, 415-438. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1007002422225<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Sex Roles"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.7334\/psicothema2013.260","article-title":"Validity evidence based on internal structure","volume":"26","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rios, J., & Wells, C. (2014). Validity evidence based on internal structure. Psicothema<\/italic>, 26<\/italic>(1), 108-116. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7334\/psicothema2013.260<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Psicothema"},{"issue":"9","key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"812","DOI":"10.3109\/09638288.2014.941019","article-title":"French-Canadian translation of the WheelCon-M (WheelCon-M-F) and evaluation of its validity evidence using telephone administration","volume":"37","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rushton, P. W., Routhier, F., Miller, W. C., Auger, C., & Lavoie, M.-P. (2015). French-Canadian translation of the WheelCon-M (WheelCon-M-F) and evaluation of its validity evidence using telephone administration. Disability and Rehabilitation<\/italic>, 37<\/italic>(9), 812-819. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/09638288.2014.941019<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Disability and Rehabilitation"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1111\/emip.12453","article-title":"Clarifying the terminology of validity and the investigative stages of validation","volume":"41","year":"2022","unstructured":"Russell, M. (2022). Clarifying the terminology of validity and the investigative stages of validation. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice<\/italic>, 41<\/italic>(2), 25-35. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/emip.12453<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice"},{"issue":"3","key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.7334\/psicothema2022.477","article-title":"Evidence for test validation: A guide for practitioners","volume":"35","year":"2023","unstructured":"Sireci, S., & Ben\u00edtez, I. (2023). Evidence for test validation: A guide for practitioners. Psicothema<\/italic>, 35<\/italic>(3), 217-226. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7334\/psicothema2022.477<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Psicothema"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.7334\/psicothema2013.256","article-title":"Validity evidence based on test content","volume":"26","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sireci, S., & Faulkner-Bond, M. (2014). Validity evidence based on test content. Psicothema<\/italic>, 26<\/italic>(1), 100-107. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7334\/psicothema2013.256<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Psicothema"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref36","first-page":"83","article-title":"The construct of content validity","volume":"45","year":"1998","unstructured":"Sireci, S. G. (1998). The construct of content validity. Social indicators research<\/italic>, 45<\/italic>(1), 83-117.","journal-title":"Social indicators research"},{"key":"ref37","first-page":"19","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sireci, S.G. (2009). Packing and unpacking sources of validity evidence: History repeats itself again. In R. Lissitz (Ed.), The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions and applications<\/italic> (pp. 19-37). Information Age Publishing Inc.","journal-title":"The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions and applications"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.2307\/23353800","article-title":"Agreeing on validity arguments","volume":"50","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sireci, S. G. (2013). Agreeing on validity arguments. Journal of Educational Measurement<\/italic>, 50<\/italic>(1), 99-104. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/23353800<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Journal of Educational Measurement"},{"key":"ref39","volume":"46","year":"1998","unstructured":"Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches<\/italic> (Vol. 46). Sage.","journal-title":"Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.4103\/sja.SJA_203_17","article-title":"Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine","volume":"11","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tsang, S., Royse, C. F., & Terkawi, A. S. (2017). Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia<\/italic>, 11<\/italic>(1), 80-89. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/sja.SJA_203_17<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref41","first-page":"1","article-title":"Cross cultural adaptation & psychometric validation of instruments: Step-wise description","volume":"1","year":"2016","unstructured":"Yasir, A. S. (2016). Cross cultural adaptation & psychometric validation of instruments: Step-wise description. International Journal of Psychiatry<\/italic>, 1(1), 1-4. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33140\/IJP\/01\/01\/00001<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"International Journal of Psychiatry"},{"key":"ref42","first-page":"65","year":"2009","unstructured":"Zumbo, B. D. (2009). Validity as contextualized and pragmatic explanation, and its implications for validation practice. In R. W. Lissitz (Ed.) The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions and applications<\/italic> (pp. 65-82). Information Age Publishing.","journal-title":"The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions and applications"},{"issue":"47","key":"ref43","first-page":"2","article-title":"Looking through the lens of DIF: Embracing the many ways of being human","volume":"4","year":"2025","unstructured":"Zumbo, B. D. (2025). Looking through the lens of DIF: Embracing the many ways of being human. The Score<\/italic>, 47<\/italic>(4), 2-5.","journal-title":"The Score"},{"key":"ref44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-56129-5","volume":"69","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zumbo, B. D., & Hubley, A. M. (Eds.). (2017). Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research<\/italic> (Vol. 69). Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-56129-5<\/ext-link>","journal-title":"Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research"}],"container-title":["Psicothema"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T09:47:33Z","timestamp":1791884853000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.psicothema.com\/pi?pii=4913"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.70478\/psicothema.2026.38.18","relation":{},"ISSN":["1886-144X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1886-144X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026]]}}}