{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,3]],"date-time":"2026-08-03T22:56:52Z","timestamp":1785797812273,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Copernicus GmbH","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,9]],"date-time":"2017-10-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1507507200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Bone Joint Infect."],"abstract":"<jats:p>Abstract. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of bioglass (BAG-S53P4) in the treatment of patients with chronic osteomyelitis and compare the results with calcium sulphate antibiotic beads in one medical centre.Methods: Retrospective analysis of 25 cases. Inclusion criteria: patients diagnosed clinically and radiographically of osteomyelitis and treated surgically (Group 1: cavitary bone defects treated with bioglass and Group 2: cavitary bone defects treated with calcium sulphate antibiotic beads) during the period of 2014 and 2015 in one medical centre.Results: Patients in group 1 (bioglass treatment): total of 12 patients (11 males and 1 female) with mean age: 50 years (30-86). Average length of hospital stay was 22 days and mean follow-up time: 23 months (16-33). Mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and mean c-reactive protein (CRP) before surgery: 55mm\/hr and 54 mg\/L, respectively. Mean ESR and mean CRP in last blood exam: 18 mm\/hr and 8 mg\/L, respectively. There were 2 postoperative complications: seroma formation and delayed wound healing. Only 1 patient had recurrence of infection.Patients in group 2 (calcium sulphate antibiotic beads treatment): total of 13 patients (9 males and 4 females) with mean age: 48 years (17-67). Average length of hospital stay was 21 days and mean follow-up time 22 months (16-29). Mean ESR and mean CRP before surgery: 51mm\/hr and 41 mg\/L, respectively. Mean ESR and mean CRP in last blood test: 15 mm\/hr and 11 mg\/L. 2 postoperative complications were registered: chronic expanding hematoma of the muscle flap donor site and seroma formation. 1 patient had recurrence of infection. Overall, there were no differences in recurrence of infection, p=0.740 and in complication rate, p=0.672. 11 (91,7%) patients in group 1 and 12 (92,3%) patients in group 2 showed no signs of recurrence of infection both clinically and radiologically at final follow-up.The most frequent cause of osteomyelitis in group 1 was post traumatic while a postsurgical aetiology was more frequent in group 2. The distal tibia was the most common location. The most frequent pathogen isolated in both groups was methicillin sensible staphylococcus aureus.Conclusions: An advance in treatment of patients with cavitary bone defects in chronic osteomyelitis is the use of synthetic bone substitutes although current evidence is low. In this study, we demonstrate how bioglass without local antibiotics and calcium sulphate antibiotic beads are both equally effective treatment options. Overall, there were no differences between groups in mean hospital stay, complication rates and recurrence of infection.\n                    <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.7150\/jbji.20404","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,17]],"date-time":"2017-10-17T09:46:44Z","timestamp":1508233604000},"page":"194-201","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":64,"title":["Treatment of Cavitary Bone Defects in Chronic Osteomyelitis: Bioactive glass S53P4 vs. Calcium Sulphate Antibiotic Beads"],"prefix":"10.5194","volume":"2","author":[{"given":"Albert","family":"Ferrando","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joan","family":"Part","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jose","family":"Baeza","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"3145","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Romano CL, Romano D, Logoluso N, Drago L. Bone and joint infections in adults: a comprehensive classification proposal. Eur Orthop Traumatol. 2011;1:207\u2013217. [PMC free article]","DOI":"10.1007\/s12570-011-0056-8"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lazzarini L, Mader JT, Calhoun JH. Osteomyelitis in long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86A:2305\u20132318.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200410000-00028"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lew DP, Waldvogel FA. Osteomyelitis. Lancet (London, England) 2004;364:369\u2013379.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(04)16727-5"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lindfors NC. Bioactive glass S53P4 as a bone graft substitute in the treatment of osteomyelitis. Bioact Glas Mater Prop Appl. 2011;47:209\u2013216. [Google Scholar]","DOI":"10.1533\/9780857093318.2.209"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Haas DW, McAndrew MP. Bacterial osteomyelitis in adults: evolving considerations in diagnosis and treatment. Am J Med. 1996;101:550\u2013561.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9343(96)00260-4"},{"key":"ref6","unstructured":"Webb JCJ, Spencer RF. The role of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement in modern orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:851\u2013857."},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bridgens J, Davies S, Tilley L, Norman P, Stockley I. Orthopaedic bone cement: do we know what we are using? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:643\u2013647.","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.90B5.19803"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Parsons B, Strauss E. Surgical management of chronic osteomyelitis. Am J Surg. 2004;188:57\u201366.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(03)00292-7"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hench LL, Paschall HA. Direct chemical bond of bioactive glass-ceramic materials to bone and muscle. J Biomed Mater Res. 1973;7:25\u201342.","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.820070304"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Roman\u00f2 CL, Logoluso N, Meani E, Roman\u00f2 D, De Vecchi E, Vassena C. et al. A comparative study of the use of bioactive glass S53P4 and antibiotic-loaded calcium-based bone substitutes in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis: A retrospective comparative study. Bone Jt J. 2014;96B:845\u2013850.","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.96B6.33014"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fillingham Y, Jacobs J. Bone grafts and their substitutes. Bone Joint J. 2016;98B:6\u20139.","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B.36350"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ferguson J, Diefenbeck M, McNally M. Ceramic Biocomposites as Biodegradable Antibiotic Carriers in the Treatment of Bone Infections. J Bone Jt Infect. 2017;2:38\u201351. [PMC free article]","DOI":"10.7150\/jbji.17234"},{"key":"ref13","unstructured":"Ochsner PE, Borens O, Bodler P-M. Infections of the musculoskeletal system: basic principles, prevention, diagnosis and treatment. 2014."},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McKee MD, Wild LM, Schemitsch EH, Waddell JP. The use of an antibiotic-impregnated, osteoconductive, bioabsorbable bone substitute in the treatment of infected long bone defects: early results of a prospective trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:622\u2013627.","DOI":"10.1097\/00005131-200210000-00002"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ferguson JY, Dudareva M, Riley ND, Stubbs D, Atkins BL, McNally MA. The use of a biodegradable antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate carrier containing tobramycin for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis: a series of 195 cases. Bone Joint J. 2014;96B:829\u2013836.","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.96B6.32756"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Borrelli JJ, Prickett WD, Ricci WM. Treatment of nonunions and osseous defects with bone graft and calcium sulfate. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003:245\u2013254.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.blo.0000069893.31220.6f"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Munukka E, Lepparanta O, Korkeamaki M, Vaahtio M, Peltola T, Zhang D. et al. Bactericidal effects of bioactive glasses on clinically important aerobic bacteria. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:27\u201332.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10856-007-3143-1"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lindfors NC, Aho AJ. Granule size and composition of bioactive glasses affect osteoconduction in rabbit. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003;14:365\u2013372.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1022988117526"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lepparanta O, Vaahtio M, Peltola T, Zhang D, Hupa L, Hupa M. et al. Antibacterial effect of bioactive glasses on clinically important anaerobic bacteria in vitro. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:547\u2013551.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10856-007-3018-5"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Day RM. Bioactive glass stimulates the secretion of angiogenic growth factors and angiogenesis in vitro. Tissue Eng. 2005;11:768\u2013777.","DOI":"10.1089\/ten.2005.11.768"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andersson OH, Kangasniemi I. Calcium phosphate formation at the surface of bioactive glass in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:1019\u20131030.","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.820250808"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Valimaki V V, Aro HT. Molecular basis for action of bioactive glasses as bone graft substitute. Scand J Surg. 2006;95:95\u2013102.","DOI":"10.1177\/145749690609500204"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jones JR. Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:4457\u20134486.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.actbio.2012.08.023"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Gestel NAP, Geurts J, Hulsen DJW, Van Rietbergen B, Hofmann S, Arts JJ. Clinical Applications of S53P4 Bioactive Glass in Bone Healing and Osteomyelitic Treatment: A Literature Review. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2015\/684826. [PMC free article]","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/684826"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McAndrew J, Efrimescu C, Sheehan E, Niall D. Through the looking glass; Bioactive glass S53P4 (BonAlive\u00ae) in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. Ir J Med Sci. 2013;182:509\u2013511.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11845-012-0895-5"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aur\u00e9gan J-C, B\u00e9gu\u00e9 T. Bioactive glass for long bone infection: a systematic review. Injury. 2015;46:S3\u2013S7.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-1383(15)30048-6"}],"container-title":["Journal of Bone and Joint Infection"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jbji.copernicus.org\/articles\/2\/194\/2017\/jbji-2-194-2017.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,4]],"date-time":"2020-08-04T09:51:11Z","timestamp":1596534671000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jbji.copernicus.org\/articles\/2\/194\/2017\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,9]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7150\/jbji.20404","relation":{},"ISSN":["2206-3552"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2206-3552","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,9]]}}}