{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,28]],"date-time":"2026-02-28T07:59:42Z","timestamp":1772265582807,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"DOI":"10.7554\/elife.08193.022","type":"component","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,25]],"date-time":"2015-09-25T05:17:54Z","timestamp":1443158274000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Figure 6\u2014figure supplement 2. Modeling of transition rates between SSB wrapping intermediates."],"prefix":"10.7554","member":"4374","container-title":[],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,23]],"date-time":"2018-08-23T11:14:21Z","timestamp":1535022861000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/elifesciences.org\/articles\/08193\/figures#fig6s2"}},"subtitle":["Unwrapping (solid circles) and wrapping (open squares) transition rates between different SSB wrapping intermediates vs force. The rates were determined from dwell times and transition probabilities in Figure 2C (\u2018Materials and methods\u2019). The data were fit globally (unwrapping, dashed line; wrapping, dotted line) using expressions of the form Equation 11 and Equation 12 using as parameters the three barriers and distances to the transition state G35\/56\u2021, G17\/35\u2021, G0\/17\u2021, x35\/56\u2021, x17\/35\u2021, and x0\/17\u2021 (\u2018Materials and methods\u2019)."],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[null]]},"references-count":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/elife.08193.022","relation":{"is-component-of":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.7554\/eLife.08193","asserted-by":"object"}]},"subject":[]}}