{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]],"date-time":"2026-08-01T02:10:16Z","timestamp":1785550216464,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"PeerJ","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]],"date-time":"2026-03-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1773100800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Futian District Health System Research Project","award":["FTWS2022071"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["FTWS2022071"]}]},{"name":"Guangdong Medical Science and Technology Research Fund","award":["A2023370"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["A2023370"]}]},{"name":"Shenzhen Science and Technology Project","award":["JCYJ20230807110911025 and JCYJ20240813150607010"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["JCYJ20230807110911025 and JCYJ20240813150607010"]}]},{"name":"2024 Undergraduate Teaching Quality Engineering Project of the Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat sen University","award":["BKXM0042"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["BKXM0042"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) achieves a scarless appearance through a single umbilical approach. However, the restricted surgical field of view, frequent instrument collisions limit its clinical applicability. This study introduces minilap-assisted modified single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MSILC), incorporating two adjacent trocars at the umbilicus, combined with a 2-mm auxiliary hole created beneath the right costal margin, to mitigate these limitations while preserving aesthetic outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To explore the clinical value of MSILC compared with traditional SILC (TSILC) in reducing instrument conflict, shortening operation time, improving operator efficiency and cosmetic effects, and providing a basis for the selection of surgical procedures for patients with high body mass index (BMI).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 51 patients with benign gallbladder diseases who underwent MSILC or TSILC between December 2021 and April 2025 at our institution were retrospectively enrolled and categorized into the MSILC (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a025) or TSILC (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a026) groups, respectively. For MSILC, a double-channel trocar was deployed at the umbilicus, combined with a 2-mm auxiliary hole layout placed beneath the right costal margin; TSILC comprised a single umbilical incision. The primary endpoint was the number of intraoperative instrument conflicts, while the secondary endpoints included operation time, Surgical difficulty score, operator comfort, and cosmetic satisfaction regarding the incision.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In the MSILC group, the number of instrument conflicts was reduced by 38.5% (median 16\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      . 26,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0&lt;\u00a00.001), while the operator comfort score improved by 50% (median 3\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      . 2,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0&lt;\u00a00.001) compared with the TSILC group. In the high BMI subgroup (\u2265 24 kg\/m\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      ), the operation time was decreased by 17.5% (83.43\u00a0\u00b1\u00a017.24\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      . 101.13\u00a0\u00b1\u00a018.12 minutes,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a00.012), and the gallbladder triangle separation time was reduced by 50% (median 1\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      . 2 minutes,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a00.029) for MSILC. No cases in eith er group required conversion to laparotomy or experienced severe complications. No significant differences were observed in the 24-hour postoperative pain score (median visual analog scale score 2\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      . 2,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a00.982) and cosmetic satisfaction regarding the incision 1 month after surgery (median 5\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      . 4,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a00.221) between the MSILC and TSILC groups. However, consumables cost and total hospitalization costs in the MSILC group increased by 34.7% (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0&lt;\u00a00.001) and 14.4% (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a00.042), respectively.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>MSILC significantly improves intraoperative efficiency by optimizing the trocar layout, especially in patients with high BMI, while maintaining safety and cosmetic outcomes comparable with those of TSILC. However, cost increases due to the use of microdevices should be taken into consideration.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj.20807","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]],"date-time":"2026-03-10T08:12:29Z","timestamp":1773130349000},"page":"e20807","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Minilap-assisted modified single-incision\n                    <i>vs.<\/i>\n                    traditional single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study on instrument conflict and operative efficiency"],"prefix":"10.7717","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Zheng","family":"Zhou","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University,  Shenzhen, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xianqing","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University,  Shenzhen, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiyan","family":"Zheng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University,  Shenzhen, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhiqun","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University,  Shenzhen, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fei","family":"Du","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University,  Shenzhen, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maoyun","family":"Xie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University,  Shenzhen, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xianjie","family":"Shi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University,  Shenzhen, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"4443","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2299","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-016-5232-z","article-title":"Impact of miniport laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus standard port laparoscopic cholecystectomy on recovery of physical activity: a randomized trial","volume":"31","author":"Alhashemi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1695","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7689","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"98","author":"Bucher","year":"2011","journal-title":"British Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"209","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1412","DOI":"10.53738\/REVMED.2009.5.209.1412","article-title":"Scarless surgery: reality through umbilical laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS)?","volume":"5","author":"Bucher","year":"2009","journal-title":"Revue M\u00e9dicale Suisse"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1153","DOI":"10.4103\/1735-1995.172982","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial study","volume":"20","author":"Dabbagh","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2012.0349","article-title":"Mini-laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"23","author":"De\u00a0Carvalho","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1016\/s0016-5085(99)70456-7","article-title":"Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States","volume":"117","author":"Everhart","year":"1999","journal-title":"Gastroenterology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"762","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-009-0688-8","article-title":"Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery","volume":"24","author":"Gill","year":"2010","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.06.070","article-title":"Novel robotic da Vinci instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery","volume":"76","author":"Haber","year":"2010","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1141","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.10574","article-title":"Meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis","volume":"104","author":"Haueter","year":"2017","journal-title":"British Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1080\/13651820260503792","article-title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the grossly obese: 4 years experience and review of literature","volume":"4","author":"Hussien","year":"2002","journal-title":"HPB"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2014.00048","DOI":"10.4293\/jsls.2014.00048","article-title":"Comparison of outcomes after single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in relation to patient body mass index","volume":"18","author":"Jang","year":"2014","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.7602\/jmis.2019.22.3.87","article-title":"Minimally invasive single-site cholecystectomy in obese patients: laparoscopic vs. robotic","volume":"22","author":"Kim","year":"2019","journal-title":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7087","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"97","author":"Lee","year":"2010","journal-title":"British Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhsa.2022.11.009","article-title":"Understanding health economics in hand surgery","volume":"48","author":"Li","year":"2023","journal-title":"Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume)"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2017.05.017","article-title":"The Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis","volume":"215","author":"Madni","year":"2018","journal-title":"American Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.024","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"216","author":"Marks","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-17","first-page":"744","article-title":"How I developed laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"25","author":"Mouret","year":"1996","journal-title":"Annals of the Academy of Medicine of Singapore"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1186\/s12893-024-02659-x","article-title":"Evolution of minimally invasive cholecystectomy: a narrative review","volume":"24","author":"Nam","year":"2024","journal-title":"BMC Surgery"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-19","first-page":"695","article-title":"One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"84","author":"Navarra","year":"1997","journal-title":"British Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1198","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2008.08.019","article-title":"Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence","volume":"55","author":"Raman","year":"2009","journal-title":"European Urology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.038","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience with critical view of safety dissection and routine intraoperative cholangiography","volume":"211","author":"Rawlings","year":"2010","journal-title":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"981","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpg.2006.05.004","article-title":"Epidemiology of gallbladder stone disease","volume":"20","author":"Shaffer","year":"2006","journal-title":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1007\/s00534-006-1161-x","article-title":"Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo guidelines","volume":"14","author":"Yamashita","year":"2007","journal-title":"Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery"},{"issue":"29","key":"10.7717\/peerj.20807\/ref-24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8912","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v21.i29.8912","article-title":"Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with gallstones: epidemiological survey in China","volume":"21","author":"Zhang","year":"2015","journal-title":"World Journal of Gastroenterology"}],"container-title":["PeerJ"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/peerj.com\/articles\/20807.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/peerj.com\/articles\/20807.xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/peerj.com\/articles\/20807.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/peerj.com\/articles\/20807.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]],"date-time":"2026-03-10T08:12:32Z","timestamp":1773130352000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/peerj.com\/articles\/20807"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]]},"references-count":24,"alternative-id":["10.7717\/peerj.20807"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7717\/peerj.20807","archive":["CLOCKSS","LOCKSS","Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["2167-8359"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2167-8359","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]]},"article-number":"e20807"}}