{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,19]],"date-time":"2026-04-19T10:42:04Z","timestamp":1776595324513,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,19]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.107325","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,19]],"date-time":"2026-04-19T09:53:28Z","timestamp":1776592408000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["A Comparative Study of Cutting Electrocautery Versus Scalpel for Surgical Incisions"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Mahim","family":"Koshariya","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A. K.","family":"Ashish","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sanjay","family":"Sisodiya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/000313481107701223","article-title":"The evolution of cauterization: from the hot iron to the Bovie","volume":"77","author":"DeLeon MF","year":"2011","unstructured":"DeLeon MF, Yeo CJ, Maxwell PJ 4th. The evolution of cauterization: from the hot iron to the Bovie. Am Surg. 2011, 77:1574-5. 10.1177\/000313481107701223","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2002-19383","article-title":"Thermal coagulation for nonvariceal bleeding","volume":"34","author":"Chung SC","year":"2002","unstructured":"Chung SC, Lau JY, Rutgeerts P, Fennerty MB. Thermal coagulation for nonvariceal bleeding. Endoscopy. 2002, 34:89-92. 10.1055\/s-2002-19383","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1258\/jrsm.2011.11k028","article-title":"John Marshall's first description of surgical electrocautery","volume":"104","author":"Ramachandran M","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ramachandran M, Aronson JK. John Marshall's first description of surgical electrocautery. J R Soc Med. 2011, 104:355-60. 10.1258\/jrsm.2011.11k028","journal-title":"J R Soc Med"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znac274","article-title":"Surgical scalpel handles and blades","volume":"109","author":"Barbosa RR","year":"2022","unstructured":"Barbosa RR. Surgical scalpel handles and blades. Br J Surg. 2022, 109:916-20. 10.1093\/bjs\/znac274","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref5","article-title":"EPINET report 2003 percutaneous injury rates","volume":"7","author":"Perry J","year":"2005","unstructured":"Perry J, Parker G, Jagger J. EPINET report 2003 percutaneous injury rates. Adv Exposure Prev. 2005, 7:42-5.","journal-title":"Adv Exposure Prev"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0041-1731135","article-title":"Occupational sharp injury and splash exposure among healthcare workers in a tertiary hospital","volume":"13","author":"Mathew R","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mathew R, Mohindra R, Sahu A, Bhat R, Ramaswami A, Aggarwal P. Occupational sharp injury and splash exposure among healthcare workers in a tertiary hospital. J Lab Physicians. 2021, 13:323-7. 10.1055\/s-0041-1731135","journal-title":"J Lab Physicians"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/ijmr.ijmr_892_23","article-title":"Incidence of needlestick injury among healthcare workers in western India","volume":"158","author":"Naidu RT","year":"2023","unstructured":"Naidu RT, Toal P, Mishra SC, Nair B, Shejul YK. Incidence of needlestick injury among healthcare workers in western India. Indian J Med Res. 2023, 158:552-8. 10.4103\/ijmr.ijmr_892_23","journal-title":"Indian J Med Res"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0039-6060(96)80137-1","article-title":"Bovie and electrosurgery","volume":"119","author":"O'Connor JL","year":"1996","unstructured":"O'Connor JL, Bloom DA. William T. Bovie and electrosurgery. Surgery. 1996, 119:390-6. 10.1016\/s0039-6060(96)80137-1","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"ref9","article-title":"Electrocautery burns: experience with three cases and review of literature","volume":"25","author":"Saaiq M","year":"2012","unstructured":"Saaiq M, Zaib S, Ahmad S. Electrocautery burns: experience with three cases and review of literature. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2012, 25:203-6.","journal-title":"Ann Burns Fire Disasters"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2024.02.017","article-title":"Hazards of surgical smoke from electrocautery: a critical review of the data","volume":"233","author":"Hurst RD","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hurst RD, Stewart CL. Hazards of surgical smoke from electrocautery: a critical review of the data. Am J Surg. 2024, 233:29-36. 10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2024.02.017","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2015.04.085","article-title":"Comparison of electrocautery incision with scalpel incision in midline abdominal surgery - a double blind randomized controlled trial","volume":"19","author":"Prakash LD","year":"2015","unstructured":"Prakash LD, Balaji N, Kumar SS, Kate V. Comparison of electrocautery incision with scalpel incision in midline abdominal surgery - a double blind randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2015, 19:78-82. 10.1016\/j.ijsu.2015.04.085","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2168.2001.01625.x","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy","volume":"88","author":"Kearns SR","year":"2001","unstructured":"Kearns SR, Connolly EM, McNally S, McNamara DA, Deasy J. Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy. Br J Surg. 2001, 88:41-4. 10.1046\/j.1365-2168.2001.01625.x","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.06.093","article-title":"Cutting electrocautery versus scalpel for surgical incisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"220","author":"Ismail A","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ismail A, Abushouk AI, Elmaraezy A, et al.. Cutting electrocautery versus scalpel for surgical incisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2017, 220:147-63. 10.1016\/j.jss.2017.06.093","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5812\/ircmj.14078","article-title":"Randomized, clinical trial on diathermy and scalpel incisions in elective general surgery","volume":"17","author":"Talpur AA","year":"2015","unstructured":"Talpur AA, Khaskheli AB, Kella N, Jamal A. Randomized, clinical trial on diathermy and scalpel incisions in elective general surgery. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015, 17:e14078. 10.5812\/ircmj.14078","journal-title":"Iran Red Crescent Med J"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.1991.01410320108015","article-title":"A prospective study of incisional time, blood loss, pain, and healing with carbon dioxide laser, scalpel, and electrosurgery","volume":"126","author":"Pearlman NW","year":"1991","unstructured":"Pearlman NW, Stiegmann GV, Vance V, et al.. A prospective study of incisional time, blood loss, pain, and healing with carbon dioxide laser, scalpel, and electrosurgery. Arch Surg. 1991, 126:1018-20. 10.1001\/archsurg.1991.01410320108015","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"ref16","article-title":"Diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study","volume":"25","author":"Chalya PL","year":"2013","unstructured":"Chalya PL, Mchembe MD, Mabula JB, Gilyoma JM. Diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study. East Cent Afr J Surg. 2013, 25:71-7.","journal-title":"East Cent Afr J Surg"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/1117-6806.153193","article-title":"Diathermy versus scalpel incision in a heterogeneous cohort of general surgery patients in a Nigerian teaching hospital","volume":"21","author":"Ayandipo OO","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ayandipo OO, Afuwape OO, Irabor D, Oluwatosin OM, Odigie V. Diathermy versus scalpel incision in a heterogeneous cohort of general surgery patients in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Niger J Surg. 2015, 21:43-7. 10.4103\/1117-6806.153193","journal-title":"Niger J Surg"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0002-9610(00)00561-4","article-title":"A multicentre collaborative study on the use of cold scalpel and electrocautery for midline abdominal incision","volume":"181","author":"Franchi M","year":"2001","unstructured":"Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Benedetti-Panici PL, et al.. A multicentre collaborative study on the use of cold scalpel and electrocautery for midline abdominal incision. Am J Surg. 2001, 181:128-32. 10.1016\/s0002-9610(00)00561-4","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2014.05.064","article-title":"Surgical site infection: an observer-blind, randomized trial comparing electrocautery and conventional scalpel","volume":"12","author":"Rongetti RL","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rongetti RL, Oliveira e Castro Pde T, Vieira RA, Serrano SV, Mengatto MF, Fregnani JH. Surgical site infection: an observer-blind, randomized trial comparing electrocautery and conventional scalpel. Int J Surg. 2014, 12:681-7. 10.1016\/j.ijsu.2014.05.064","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00015458.2010.11680654","article-title":"Do different abdominal incision techniques play a role in wound complications in patients operated on for gastrointestinal malignancies ? \"Scalpel vs. electrocautery\"","volume":"110","author":"Eren T","year":"2010","unstructured":"Eren T, Balik E, Ziyade S, Yamaner S, Akyuz A, Bugra D. Do different abdominal incision techniques play a role in wound complications in patients operated on for gastrointestinal malignancies ? \"Scalpel vs. electrocautery\". Acta Chir Belg. 2010, 110:451-6. 10.1080\/00015458.2010.11680654","journal-title":"Acta Chir Belg"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/417567-a-comparative-study-of-cutting-electrocautery-versus-scalpel-for-surgical-incisions","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,19]],"date-time":"2026-04-19T09:53:28Z","timestamp":1776592408000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/417567-a-comparative-study-of-cutting-electrocautery-versus-scalpel-for-surgical-incisions"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,19]]},"references-count":20,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.107325","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,19]]}}}