{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,17]],"date-time":"2026-05-17T13:07:45Z","timestamp":1779023265452,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,17]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.109016","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,17]],"date-time":"2026-05-17T12:31:37Z","timestamp":1779021097000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison of Different Methods of Labor Induction and Their Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Okelue E","family":"Okobi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Akinyele","family":"Oladimeji","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Idayat A","family":"Durojaiye","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Omowunmi","family":"Adewara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Adaora W","family":"Mochu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Oluwaferanmi","family":"Shofu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Adewale M","family":"Adedoyin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sunday O","family":"Arifayan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.03.014","article-title":"Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort","volume":"206","author":"Laughon SK","year":"2012","unstructured":"Laughon SK, Zhang J, Grewal J, Sundaram R, Beaver J, Reddy UM. Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012, 206:486.e1-9. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.03.014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14550","article-title":"Outpatient vs inpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol: a retrospective study","volume":"102","author":"Hall\u00e9n N","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hall\u00e9n N, Amini M, Wide-Swensson D, Herbst A. Outpatient vs inpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol: a retrospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023, 102:605-11. 10.1111\/aogs.14550","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.15005","article-title":"May the indication for a previous cesarean section affect the outcome at trial of labor in women with induction of labor? A\u00a0retrospective cohort study","volume":"104","author":"Frykman J","year":"2025","unstructured":"Frykman J, Nilsson E, Wiberg-Itzel E, Wallstrom T. May the indication for a previous cesarean section affect the outcome at trial of labor in women with induction of labor? A\u00a0retrospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025, 104:194-202. 10.1111\/aogs.15005","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18332\/ejm\/142782","article-title":"Prospective cohort study of induction of labor: indications, outcome and postpartum hemorrhage","volume":"5","author":"Kumar B","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kumar B, Kumari S, Hughes S, Savill S. Prospective cohort study of induction of labor: indications, outcome and postpartum hemorrhage. Eur J Midwifery. 2021, 5:53. 10.18332\/ejm\/142782","journal-title":"Eur J Midwifery"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0228196","article-title":"A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour","volume":"15","author":"Coates D","year":"2020","unstructured":"Coates D, Makris A, Catling C, et al.. A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour. PLoS One. 2020, 15:0228196. 10.1371\/journal.pone.0228196","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0336025","article-title":"Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of vaginal and sublingual low-dose misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor \u0131nduction: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"20","author":"Eminov E","year":"2025","unstructured":"Eminov E, Eminov A. Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of vaginal and sublingual low-dose misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor \u0131nduction: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2025, 20:0336025. 10.1371\/journal.pone.0336025","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-022-04386-8","article-title":"Nomogram predicting cesarean delivery undergoing induction of labor among high-risk nulliparous women at term: a retrospective study","volume":"22","author":"Zhou H","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zhou H, Gu N, Yang Y, Wang Z, Hu Y, Dai Y. Nomogram predicting cesarean delivery undergoing induction of labor among high-risk nulliparous women at term: a retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022, 22:55. 10.1186\/s12884-022-04386-8","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.58030","article-title":"Effectiveness of single fetal membrane sweeping in reducing elective labor induction for postdate pregnancies (38+0 to 40+6 Weeks): a randomized controlled trial","volume":"16","author":"Ehikioya E","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ehikioya E, Nwachukwu OB, Okobi OE. Effectiveness of single fetal membrane sweeping in reducing elective labor induction for postdate pregnancies (38+0 to 40+6 Weeks): a randomized controlled trial. Cureus. 2024, 16:58030. 10.7759\/cureus.58030","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12320","article-title":"Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study","volume":"93","author":"Jozwiak M","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jozwiak M, van de Lest HA, Burger NB, Dijksterhuis MG, De Leeuw JW. Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014, 93:296-301. 10.1111\/aogs.12320","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heliyon.2023.e13055","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes of failed prostaglandin induction of labour: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"9","author":"Berezowsky A","year":"2023","unstructured":"Berezowsky A, Zeevi G, Hadar E, Krispin E. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of failed prostaglandin induction of labour: a retrospective cohort study. Heliyon. 2023, 9:13055. 10.1016\/j.heliyon.2023.e13055","journal-title":"Heliyon"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.23736\/S2724-606X.23.05414-3","article-title":"Induction of labor with repeated prostaglandin administration after failure of dinoprostone vaginal insert: a retrospective study comparing dinoprostone and misoprostol","volume":"77","author":"Mancarella M","year":"2025","unstructured":"Mancarella M, Costa Torro D, Moggio G, Bounous VE, Biglia N. Induction of labor with repeated prostaglandin administration after failure of dinoprostone vaginal insert: a retrospective study comparing dinoprostone and misoprostol. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2025, 77:19-26. 10.23736\/S2724-606X.23.05414-3","journal-title":"Minerva Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001","article-title":"Comparing Foley catheter to prostaglandins for cervical ripening in multiparous women","volume":"42","author":"Manly E","year":"2020","unstructured":"Manly E, Hiersch L, Moloney A, et al.. Comparing Foley catheter to prostaglandins for cervical ripening in multiparous women. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020, 42:853-60. 10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/healthcare11040543","article-title":"Induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"11","author":"Germano C","year":"2023","unstructured":"Germano C, Mappa I, Cromi A, et al.. Induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix: a retrospective cohort study. Healthcare (Basel). 2023, 11:543. 10.3390\/healthcare11040543","journal-title":"Healthcare (Basel)"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-88723-5","article-title":"Misoprostol vs dinoprostone vaginal insert in labour induction: comparison of obstetrical outcome","volume":"11","author":"Mlodawski J","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mlodawski J, Mlodawska M, Armanska J, Swiercz G, Gluszek S. Misoprostol vs dinoprostone vaginal insert in labour induction: comparison of obstetrical outcome. Sci Rep. 2021, 11:9077. 10.1038\/s41598-021-88723-5","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.05.005","article-title":"Progress of labor in women induced with misoprostol versus the Foley catheter","volume":"209","author":"Tuuli MG","year":"2013","unstructured":"Tuuli MG, Keegan MB, Odibo AO, Roehl K, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Progress of labor in women induced with misoprostol versus the Foley catheter. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013, 209:237.e1-7. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.05.005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13856","article-title":"Balloon catheter use for cervical ripening in women with term pre-labor rupture of membranes: a 5-year cohort study","volume":"99","author":"Kruit H","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kruit H, Tolvanen J, Eriksson J, Place K, Nupponen I, Rahkonen L. Balloon catheter use for cervical ripening in women with term pre-labor rupture of membranes: a 5-year cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020, 99:1174-80. 10.1111\/aogs.13856","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0040-1713818","article-title":"Labor and delivery outcomes with the sequential use of misoprostol followed by cervical foley catheter","volume":"38","author":"Hopkins MK","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hopkins MK, Hamm RF, Srinivas SK, Levine LD. Labor and delivery outcomes with the sequential use of misoprostol followed by cervical foley catheter. Am J Perinatol. 2021, 38:1500-4. 10.1055\/s-0040-1713818","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1675219","article-title":"Buccal versus vaginal misoprostol for term induction of labor: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"36","author":"Dorr ML","year":"2019","unstructured":"Dorr ML, Pierson RC, Daggy J, Quinney SK, Haas DM. Buccal versus vaginal misoprostol for term induction of labor: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Perinatol. 2019, 36:765-72. 10.1055\/s-0038-1675219","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph20021138","article-title":"The association between cervical length and successful labor induction: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"20","author":"Li PC","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li PC, Tsui WL, Ding DC. The association between cervical length and successful labor induction: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023, 20:1138. 10.3390\/ijerph20021138","journal-title":"Int J Environ Res Public Health"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1675351","article-title":"Clinical insights for cervical ripening and labor induction using prostaglandins","volume":"8","author":"Pierce S","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pierce S, Bakker R, Myers DA, Edwards RK. Clinical insights for cervical ripening and labor induction using prostaglandins. AJP Rep. 2018, 8:307-14. 10.1055\/s-0038-1675351","journal-title":"AJP Rep"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page MJ","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al.. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021, 372:71. 10.1136\/bmj.n71","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jre.13405","article-title":"Risk of bias evaluation of cross-sectional studies: adaptation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale","author":"Carra MC","year":"2025","unstructured":"Carra MC, Romandini P, Romandini M. Risk of bias evaluation of cross-sectional studies: adaptation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. J Periodontal Res. 2025, 10.1111\/jre.13405","journal-title":"J Periodontal Res"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","article-title":"RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"366","author":"Sterne JA","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sterne JA, Savovi\u0107 J, Page MJ, et al.. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019, 366:4898. 10.1136\/bmj.l4898","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-023-01847-8","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of cervical ripening and induction of labor using prostaglandin e1 in primiparas, multiparas and grand multiparas","volume":"73","author":"Kashani-Ligumsky L","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kashani-Ligumsky L, Bilgory A, Neiger R. Safety and efficacy of cervical ripening and induction of labor using prostaglandin e1 in primiparas, multiparas and grand multiparas. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023, 73:222-6. 10.1007\/s13224-023-01847-8","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol India"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.27643","article-title":"Timing of induction of labor in suspected macrosomia: retrospective cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"64","author":"Badr DA","year":"2024","unstructured":"Badr DA, Carlin A, Kadji C, Kang X, Cannie MM, Jani JC. Timing of induction of labor in suspected macrosomia: retrospective cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024, 64:443-52. 10.1002\/uog.27643","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0263685","article-title":"Is there an increased risk of cesarean section in obese women after induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study","volume":"17","author":"Bjorklund J","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bjorklund J, Wiberg-Itzel E, Wallstrom T. Is there an increased risk of cesarean section in obese women after induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2022, 17:0263685. 10.1371\/journal.pone.0263685","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11845-023-03568-3","article-title":"A model to predict delivery time following induction of labor at term with a dinoprostone vaginal insert: a retrospective study","volume":"193","author":"Huang F","year":"2024","unstructured":"Huang F, Chen H, Wu X, Li J, Guo J, Zhang X, Qiao Y. A model to predict delivery time following induction of labor at term with a dinoprostone vaginal insert: a retrospective study. Ir J Med Sci. 2024, 193:1343-50. 10.1007\/s11845-023-03568-3","journal-title":"Ir J Med Sci"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.xagr.2023.100168","article-title":"Impacts of embracing 39-week elective induction across an entire labor and delivery unit","volume":"3","author":"Jelks AT","year":"2023","unstructured":"Jelks AT, Yao AQ, Byrne JD. Impacts of embracing 39-week elective induction across an entire labor and delivery unit. AJOG Glob Rep. 2023, 3:100168. 10.1016\/j.xagr.2023.100168","journal-title":"AJOG Glob Rep"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-021-04151-3","article-title":"Clinical predictive factors for vaginal delivery following induction of labour among pregnant women in Jordan","volume":"21","author":"Obeidat RA","year":"2021","unstructured":"Obeidat RA, Almaaitah M, Ben-Sadon A, et al.. Clinical predictive factors for vaginal delivery following induction of labour among pregnant women in Jordan. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021, 21:685. 10.1186\/s12884-021-04151-3","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.m3377","article-title":"Risk of complicated birth at term in nulliparous and multiparous women using routinely collected maternity data in England: cohort study","volume":"371","author":"Jardine J","year":"2020","unstructured":"Jardine J, Blotkamp A, Gurol-Urganci I, et al.. Risk of complicated birth at term in nulliparous and multiparous women using routinely collected maternity data in England: cohort study. BMJ. 2020, 371:3377. 10.1136\/bmj.m3377","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.035","article-title":"Contemporary patterns of labor in nulliparous and multiparous women","volume":"222","author":"Ashwal E","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ashwal E, Livne MY, Benichou JI, et al.. Contemporary patterns of labor in nulliparous and multiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020, 222:267.e1-9. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.035","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004945","article-title":"Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation","volume":"15","author":"Middleton P","year":"2020","unstructured":"Middleton P, Shepherd E, Morris J, Crowther CA, Gomersall JC. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020, 15:004945. 10.1002\/14651858.CD004945","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"ref33","article-title":"WHO recommendations on induction of labour, at or beyond term","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2022","unstructured":"World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations on Induction of Labour, at or Beyond Term. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; 2022. https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/36279382\/."},{"key":"ref34","article-title":"Inducing labour","author":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)","year":"2021","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Inducing labour. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, United Kingdom; 2021. https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/35438865\/."}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/492584-comparison-of-different-methods-of-labor-induction-and-their-maternal-and-neonatal-outcomes-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,17]],"date-time":"2026-05-17T12:31:38Z","timestamp":1779021098000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/492584-comparison-of-different-methods-of-labor-induction-and-their-maternal-and-neonatal-outcomes-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,17]]},"references-count":34,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.109016","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,17]]}}}