{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T08:03:42Z","timestamp":1780473822781,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.110158","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T07:23:26Z","timestamp":1780471406000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening Across Gestational Ages: A Retrospective Descriptive Study in a Resource-Limited Setting"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Kawtar","family":"Iraqi Houssaini","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mohamed Amine","family":"Guennouni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bouchra","family":"Fakhir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Abderraouf","family":"Soummani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0136856","article-title":"Foley catheter for induction of labor at term: an open-label, randomized controlled trial","volume":"10","author":"Gu N","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gu N, Ru T, Wang Z, Dai Y, Zheng M, Xu B, Hu Y. Foley catheter for induction of labor at term: an open-label, randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2015, 10:e0136856. 10.1371\/journal.pone.0136856","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1967.tb03931.x","article-title":"The unfavourable cervix and induction of labour using a cervical balloon","volume":"74","author":"Embrey MP","year":"1967","unstructured":"Embrey MP, Mollison BG. The unfavourable cervix and induction of labour using a cervical balloon. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1967, 74:44-8. 10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1967.tb03931.x","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015","article-title":"Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)","volume":"170","author":"Sentilhes L","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sentilhes L, Vayssi\u00e8re C, Beucher G, et al.. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013, 170:25-32. 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61484-0","article-title":"Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial","volume":"378","author":"Jozwiak M","year":"2011","unstructured":"Jozwiak M, Oude Rengerink K, Benthem M, et al.. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011, 378:2095-103. 10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61484-0","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101515","article-title":"How labor induction methods have evolved throughout history, from the Egyptian era to the present day: evolution, effectiveness, and safety","volume":"7","author":"Patabendige M","year":"2025","unstructured":"Patabendige M, Rolnik DL, Li W, Weeks AD, Mol BW. How labor induction methods have evolved throughout history, from the Egyptian era to the present day: evolution, effectiveness, and safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2025, 7:101515. 10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101515","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.78404","article-title":"Effectiveness of intracervical Foley catheter for induction of labor in women with singleton term pregnancy and previous lower segment cesarean section: a pilot study","volume":"17","author":"Dsouza QS","year":"2025","unstructured":"Dsouza QS, Sasidharan SE, Dsouza TS, Ambusaidi Q, Monteiro AD. Effectiveness of intracervical Foley catheter for induction of labor in women with singleton term pregnancy and previous lower segment cesarean section: a pilot study. Cureus. 2025, 17:e78404. 10.7759\/cureus.78404","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001233.pub2","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labour","author":"Jozwiak M","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, Mol BW, Irion O, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012, CD001233. 10.1002\/14651858.CD001233.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.02.009","article-title":"Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety","volume":"230","author":"Sanchez-Ramos L","year":"2024","unstructured":"Sanchez-Ramos L, Levine LD, Sciscione AC, et al.. Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024, 230:S669-95. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.02.009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1459551","article-title":"Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin on labor induction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"32","author":"Liu J","year":"2019","unstructured":"Liu J, Song G, Meng T, Ji L. Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin on labor induction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019, 32:3168-75. 10.1080\/14767058.2018.1459551","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001233.pub4","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labour","volume":"3","author":"de Vaan MD","year":"2023","unstructured":"de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, et al.. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023, 3:CD001233. 10.1002\/14651858.CD001233.pub4","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"ref11","unstructured":"WHO recommendations for induction of labour. (2011). Accessed. 2026: https:\/\/www.who.int\/publications\/i\/item\/9789241501156."},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001778","article-title":"Mechanical and pharmacologic methods of labor induction: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"128","author":"Levine LD","year":"2016","unstructured":"Levine LD, Downes KL, Elovitz MA, Parry S, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK. Mechanical and pharmacologic methods of labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016, 128:1357-64. 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001778","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000596","article-title":"Vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth: a comparison of 3 national guidelines","volume":"73","author":"Tsakiridis I","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, Athanasiadis A, Dagklis T. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth: a comparison of 3 national guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2018, 73:537-43. 10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000596","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.05.009","article-title":"Cervical ripening and labor induction: evaluation of single balloon catheter compared to double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert","volume":"46","author":"Pez V","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pez V, Deruelle P, Kyheng M, Boyon C, Clouqueur E, Garabedian C. Cervical ripening and labor induction: evaluation of single balloon catheter compared to double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018, 46:570-4. 10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.05.009","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18295\/squmj.2016.16.04.007","article-title":"Use of intracervical Foley catheter for induction of labour in cases of previous caesarean section: experience of a single tertiary centre in Oman","volume":"16","author":"Gonsalves H","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gonsalves H, Al-Riyami N, Al-Dughaishi T, Gowri V, Al-Azri M, Salahuddin A. Use of intracervical Foley catheter for induction of labour in cases of previous caesarean section: experience of a single tertiary centre in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2016, 16:e445-50. 10.18295\/squmj.2016.16.04.007","journal-title":"Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13104-017-2478-z","article-title":"Foley catheter for cervical priming in induction of labour at University Obstetrics Unit, Colombo, Sri Lanka: a clinical audit with a patient satisfaction survey","volume":"10","author":"Patabendige M","year":"2017","unstructured":"Patabendige M, Jayawardane A. Foley catheter for cervical priming in induction of labour at University Obstetrics Unit, Colombo, Sri Lanka: a clinical audit with a patient satisfaction survey. BMC Res Notes. 2017, 10:155. 10.1186\/s13104-017-2478-z","journal-title":"BMC Res Notes"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.033","article-title":"A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"191","author":"Levy R","year":"2004","unstructured":"Levy R, Kanengiser B, Furman B, Ben Arie A, Brown D, Hagay ZJ. A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004, 191:1632-6. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.033","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.029","article-title":"Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study","volume":"204","author":"Cromi A","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Agosti M, Serati M, Uccella S, Arlant V, Bolis P. Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011, 204:338.e1-7. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.029","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.03.010","article-title":"Cervical ripening with balloon catheter for scared uterus: a three-year retrospective study [Article in French]","volume":"42","author":"Rossard L","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rossard L, Arlicot C, Blasco H, Potin J, Denis C, Mercier D, Perrotin F. Cervical ripening with balloon catheter for scared uterus: a three-year retrospective study [Article in French]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013, 42:480-7. 10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.03.010","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2014.07.014","article-title":"Cervical ripening after previous cesarean section with Foley catheter: a prospective study of 41\u00a0patients","volume":"44","author":"Lamourdedieu C","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lamourdedieu C, Gnisci A, Marcelli M, Heckenroth H, Gamerre M, Agostini A. Cervical ripening after previous cesarean section with Foley catheter: a prospective study of 41\u00a0patients. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015, 44:426-32. 10.1016\/j.jgyn.2014.07.014","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.05.005","article-title":"Progress of labor in women induced with misoprostol versus the Foley catheter","volume":"209","author":"Tuuli MG","year":"2013","unstructured":"Tuuli MG, Keegan MB, Odibo AO, Roehl K, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Progress of labor in women induced with misoprostol versus the Foley catheter. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013, 209:237.e1-7. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.05.005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph17061825","article-title":"Intracervical Foley catheter plus intravaginal misoprostol vs intravaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening: a meta-analysis","volume":"17","author":"Lee HH","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lee HH, Huang BS, Cheng M, et al.. Intracervical Foley catheter plus intravaginal misoprostol vs intravaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening: a meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020, 17:1825. 10.3390\/ijerph17061825","journal-title":"Int J Environ Res Public Health"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0267400","article-title":"Comparison of delivery outcomes in low-dose and high-dose oxytocin regimens for induction of labor following cervical ripening with a balloon catheter: a retrospective observational cohort study","volume":"17","author":"Kruit H","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kruit H, Nupponen I, Heinonen S, Rahkonen L. Comparison of delivery outcomes in low-dose and high-dose oxytocin regimens for induction of labor following cervical ripening with a balloon catheter: a retrospective observational cohort study. PLoS One. 2022, 17:e0267400. 10.1371\/journal.pone.0267400","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.038","article-title":"Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis","volume":"203","author":"Vaknin Z","year":"2010","unstructured":"Vaknin Z, Kurzweil Y, Sherman D. Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 203:418-29. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.038","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x","article-title":"Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel","volume":"116","author":"Pennell CE","year":"2009","unstructured":"Pennell CE, Henderson JJ, O'Neill MJ, McChlery S, Doherty DA, Dickinson JE. Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel. BJOG. 2009, 116:1443-52. 10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436","article-title":"Vaginal dinoprostone vs Foley catheter for induction of labor at term with an unfavorable cervix: an open-label randomized controlled trial","volume":"6","author":"Liu X","year":"2024","unstructured":"Liu X, Huang D, Liu Y, et al.. Vaginal dinoprostone vs Foley catheter for induction of labor at term with an unfavorable cervix: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024, 6:101436. 10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.01.005","article-title":"Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening","volume":"129","author":"Chen W","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chen W, Xue J, Gaudet L, Walker M, Wen SW. Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015, 129:193-8. 10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.01.005","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/452728-foley-catheter-for-cervical-ripening-across-gestational-ages-a-retrospective-descriptive-study-in-a-resource-limited-setting","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T07:23:30Z","timestamp":1780471410000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/452728-foley-catheter-for-cervical-ripening-across-gestational-ages-a-retrospective-descriptive-study-in-a-resource-limited-setting"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]]},"references-count":27,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.110158","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]]}}}