{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]],"date-time":"2026-07-07T17:21:18Z","timestamp":1783444878803,"version":"3.54.6"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.112216","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]],"date-time":"2026-07-07T16:27:21Z","timestamp":1783441641000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Safety and Efficacy of Sequential Labor Induction Methods After Failed Primary Induction of Labor: A Retrospective Cohort Study"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Noureen","family":"Waleem","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Neeru","family":"Arora","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Muna","family":"Al Badi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Houda N","family":"Al Yaqoobi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Farah","family":"Khan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rashid","family":"Sultan Al Muqbali","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin no. 107: induction of labor","volume":"114","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2009","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 107: induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009, 114:386-97. 10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-196408000-00022","article-title":"Pelvic scoring for elective induction","volume":"24","author":"Bishop EH","year":"1964","unstructured":"Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol. 1964, 24:266-8. 10.1097\/00006250-196408000-00022","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-195301000-00041","article-title":"A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant","volume":"32","author":"Apgar V","year":"1953","unstructured":"Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg. 1953, 32:260-7.","journal-title":"Curr Res Anesth Analg"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821189e3","article-title":"Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery","volume":"117","author":"Laughon SK","year":"2011","unstructured":"Laughon SK, Zhang J, Troendle J, Sun L, Reddy UM. Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011, 117:805-11. 10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821189e3","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref5","article-title":"WHO Recommendations on Induction of Labor at or Beyond Term (Internet)","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2022","unstructured":"World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations on Induction of Labor at or Beyond Term (Internet). World Health Organization, Geneva; 2022."},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00084-2","article-title":"Induction of labor at term with oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone or a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicenter randomized controlled trial","volume":"387","author":"Ten Eikelder ML","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ten Eikelder ML, Oude Rengerink K, Jozwiak M, et al.. Induction of labor at term with oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone or a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2016, 387:1619-28. 10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00084-2","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","article-title":"Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women","volume":"105","author":"Vrouenraets FP","year":"2005","unstructured":"Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 105:690-7. 10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001233.pub2","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labour","volume":"2012","author":"Jozwiak M","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, Mol BW, Irion O, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012, 2012:CD001233. 10.1002\/14651858.CD001233.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61484-0","article-title":"Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomized controlled trial","volume":"378","author":"Jozwiak M","year":"2011","unstructured":"Jozwiak M, Rengerink KO, Benthem M, et al.. Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2011, 378:2095-103. 10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61484-0","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h217","article-title":"Labour induction with prostaglandins: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"350","author":"Alfirevic Z","year":"2015","unstructured":"Alfirevic Z, Keeney E, Dowswell T, et al.. Labour induction with prostaglandins: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ. 2015, 350:h217. 10.1136\/bmj.h217","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1018936","article-title":"Sequential use of vaginal dinoprostone and oxytocin vs. oxytocin alone after failed initial induction: a randomized trial","volume":"29","author":"Antonazzo P","year":"2016","unstructured":"Antonazzo P, Impey L. Sequential use of vaginal dinoprostone and oxytocin vs. oxytocin alone after failed initial induction: a randomized trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016, 29:542-6. 10.3109\/14767058.2015.1018936","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2020.1769594","article-title":"Comparison of two management options for labor induction following unsuccessful prostaglandin E2 ripening","volume":"35","author":"Gulersen M","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gulersen M, DiSturco M, Krantz DA, Bornstein E. Comparison of two management options for labor induction following unsuccessful prostaglandin E2 ripening. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022, 35:1759-63. 10.1080\/14767058.2020.1769594","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101510","article-title":"Results of the RE-DINO multicenter randomized trial on the repeated use of vaginal dinoprostone (Propess\u00ae) for labor induction in patients at term","volume":"6","author":"Coste-Mazeau P","year":"2024","unstructured":"Coste-Mazeau P, Gallot D, Siegerth F, et al.. Results of the RE-DINO multicenter randomized trial on the repeated use of vaginal dinoprostone (Propess\u00ae) for labor induction in patients at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024, 6:101510. 10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101510","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"key":"ref14","article-title":"WHO Recommendations on Mechanical Methods for Induction of Labor: Web Annex\u2014Evidence-to-Decision Framework (Internet)","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2022","unstructured":"World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations on Mechanical Methods for Induction of Labor: Web Annex\u2014Evidence-to-Decision Framework (Internet). World Health Organization, Geneva; 2022."},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm11113519","article-title":"Comparison of the dinoprostone vaginal insert and dinoprostone tablet for the induction of labor in primipara: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"11","author":"Ting NS","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ting NS, Ding DC, Wei YC. Comparison of the dinoprostone vaginal insert and dinoprostone tablet for the induction of labor in primipara: a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Med. 2022, 11:3519. 10.3390\/jcm11113519","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18231\/j.ijogr.2024.035","article-title":"A comparative study between dinoprostone pessary and dinoprostone gel for induction of labor and neonatal outcome","volume":"11","author":"Rashmi MD","year":"2024","unstructured":"Rashmi MD, Rai P. A comparative study between dinoprostone pessary and dinoprostone gel for induction of labor and neonatal outcome. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2024, 11:167-71. 10.18231\/j.ijogr.2024.035","journal-title":"Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/00494755221112177","article-title":"Sequential use of drugs (prostaglandin E1 after failed trial of PGE2 gel) for induction of labour: a retrospective observational study","volume":"53","author":"De A","year":"2023","unstructured":"De A, Nigam A, Sharma S, Anwar A, Gupta N, Gupta N. Sequential use of drugs (prostaglandin E1 after failed trial of PGE2 gel) for induction of labour: a retrospective observational study. Trop Doct. 2023, 53:241-5. 10.1177\/00494755221112177","journal-title":"Trop Doct"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.23736\/S2724-606X.23.05414-3","article-title":"Induction of labor with repeated prostaglandin administration after failure of dinoprostone vaginal insert: a retrospective study comparing dinoprostone and misoprostol","volume":"77","author":"Mancarella M","year":"2025","unstructured":"Mancarella M, Costa Torro D, Moggio G, Bounous VE, Biglia N. Induction of labor with repeated prostaglandin administration after failure of dinoprostone vaginal insert: a retrospective study comparing dinoprostone and misoprostol. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2025, 77:19-26. 10.23736\/S2724-606X.23.05414-3","journal-title":"Minerva Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.33855","article-title":"Intra-cervical Foley balloon catheter versus prostaglandins for the induction of labor: a literature review","volume":"15","author":"Sangram Singh B","year":"2023","unstructured":"Sangram Singh B, Joshi K, Pajai S. Intra-cervical Foley balloon catheter versus prostaglandins for the induction of labor: a literature review. Cureus. 2023, 15:e33855. 10.7759\/cureus.33855","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.31083\/CEOG26977","article-title":"Comparison of double balloon catheter and dinoprostone vaginal insert in induced labor: a meta-analysis of 2267 patients","volume":"52","author":"Zhou X","year":"2025","unstructured":"Zhou X, Wang Y. Comparison of double balloon catheter and dinoprostone vaginal insert in induced labor: a meta-analysis of 2267 patients. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2025, 52:26977. 10.31083\/CEOG26977","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2024-089628","article-title":"Cook's balloon versus dinoprostone for labour induction of term pregnancies with fetal growth restriction: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in tertiary maternity hospitals in Spain (COLIGROW study)","volume":"14","author":"Herraiz I","year":"2024","unstructured":"Herraiz I, Meler E, Mazarico E, et al.. Cook's balloon versus dinoprostone for labour induction of term pregnancies with fetal growth restriction: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in tertiary maternity hospitals in Spain (COLIGROW study). BMJ Open. 2024, 14:e089628. 10.1136\/bmjopen-2024-089628","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2024.1459793","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for labor induction at term: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"11","author":"Lakho N","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lakho N, Hyder M, Ashraf T, et al.. Efficacy and safety of misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for labor induction at term: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024, 11:1459793. 10.3389\/fmed.2024.1459793","journal-title":"Front Med (Lausanne)"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/499084-safety-and-efficacy-of-sequential-labor-induction-methods-after-failed-primary-induction-of-labor-a-retrospective-cohort-study","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]],"date-time":"2026-07-07T16:27:22Z","timestamp":1783441642000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/499084-safety-and-efficacy-of-sequential-labor-induction-methods-after-failed-primary-induction-of-labor-a-retrospective-cohort-study"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]]},"references-count":22,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.112216","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]]}}}