{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,11]],"date-time":"2026-07-11T14:14:48Z","timestamp":1783779288016,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,11]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.112462","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,11]],"date-time":"2026-07-11T14:07:22Z","timestamp":1783778842000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Billing Opinion Reliability Score 100: A Structured Framework for Billing and Medicolegal Expert Reliability"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Andrew M","family":"Klapper","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anthony N","family":"Dardano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael S","family":"Risin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karla","family":"Maita","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Monali","family":"Mahedia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","unstructured":"Federal Rule of Evidence 702. Testimony by expert witnesses. Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. (2026). Accessed. May 29, 2026: https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/rules\/fre\/rule_702."},{"key":"ref2","article-title":"U.S. Reports: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579","author":"Blackmun HA","year":"1992","unstructured":"Blackmun HA, Supreme Court of the United States. U.S. Reports: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579. Library of Congress, Washington, DC; 1992."},{"key":"ref3","article-title":"U.S. Reports: Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137","author":"Breyer SG","year":"1999","unstructured":"Breyer SG, Supreme Court of the United States. U.S. Reports: Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137. Library of Congress, Washington, DC; 1999."},{"key":"ref4","unstructured":"Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules. Committee notes on rules - 2023 amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 702. United States Courts. (2026). Accessed: May 29, 2026: https:\/\/www.uscourts.gov\/rules-policies\/current-rules-practice-procedure\/federal-rules-evidence."},{"key":"ref5","article-title":"Requirements related to surprise billing; Part II. Interim final rules with request for comments","volume":"86","author":"Office of Personnel Management; Internal Revenue Service","year":"2021","unstructured":"Office of Personnel Management; Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury; Employee Benefits Security Administration, Department of Labor; Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services. Requirements related to surprise billing; Part II. Interim final rules with request for comments. Fed Regist. 2021, 86:55980-6039.","journal-title":"Fed Regist"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","article-title":"GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations","volume":"336","author":"Guyatt GH","year":"2008","unstructured":"Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Sch\u00fcnemann HJ. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008, 336:924-6. 10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005","article-title":"ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed","volume":"69","author":"Whiting P","year":"2016","unstructured":"Whiting P, Savovi\u0107 J, Higgins JP, et al.. ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016, 69:225-34. 10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.17226\/13058","article-title":"Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust","author":"Institute of Medicine","year":"2011","unstructured":"Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. National Academies Press, Washington, DC; 2011. 10.17226\/13058"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjmed.2005.10.036","article-title":"Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application","volume":"119","author":"Cook DA","year":"2006","unstructured":"Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med. 2006, 119:166.e7-16. 10.1016\/j.amjmed.2005.10.036","journal-title":"Am J Med"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jedm.12000","article-title":"Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores","volume":"50","author":"Kane MT","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kane MT. Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. J Educ Meas. 2013, 50:1-73. 10.1111\/jedm.12000","journal-title":"J Educ Meas"},{"key":"ref11","article-title":"Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing","author":"American Educational Research Association; American Psychological Association; National Council on Measurement in Education","year":"2014","unstructured":"American Educational Research Association; American Psychological Association; National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC; 2014."},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/14999013.2014.906519","article-title":"Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20, Version 3 (HCR-20V3): development and overview","volume":"13","author":"Douglas KS","year":"2014","unstructured":"Douglas KS, Hart SD, Webster CD, Belfrage H, Guy LS, Wilson CM. Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20, Version 3 (HCR-20V3): development and overview. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2014, 13:93-108. 10.1080\/14999013.2014.906519","journal-title":"Int J Forensic Ment Health"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/1076-8971.2.2.293","article-title":"Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: the clinical-statistical controversy","volume":"2","author":"Grove WM","year":"1996","unstructured":"Grove WM, Meehl PE. Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: the clinical-statistical controversy. Psychol Public Policy Law. 1996, 2:293-323. 10.1037\/1076-8971.2.2.293","journal-title":"Psychol Public Policy Law"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"45 CFR Section 149.140. Methodology for calculating qualifying payment amount. (2026). Accessed. May 29, 2026: https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-45\/subtitle-A\/subchapter-B\/part-149\/subpart-B\/section-149.140.","DOI":"10.53126\/MEB45149"},{"key":"ref15","unstructured":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Requirements related to surprise billing; part II interim final rule with comment period. Fact sheet. (2026). Accessed: May 29, 2026: https:\/\/www.cms.gov\/newsroom\/fact-sheets\/requirements-related-surprise-billing-part-ii-interim-final-rule-comment-period."},{"key":"ref16","unstructured":"AIR Health. FAIR Health data support state and federal surprise billing laws. (2026). Accessed: May 29, 2026: https:\/\/www.fairhealth.org\/article\/fair-health-data-support-state-and-federal-surprise-billing-laws."},{"key":"ref17","unstructured":"AIR Health Consumer. Welcome to FAIR Health. (2026). Accessed: May 29, 2026: https:\/\/www.fairhealthconsumer.org\/."},{"key":"ref18","unstructured":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare physician fee schedule. (2026). Accessed: May 29, 2026: https:\/\/www.cms.gov\/medicare\/payment\/fee-schedules\/physician."},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/1040-3590.6.4.284","article-title":"Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology","volume":"6","author":"Cicchetti DV","year":"1994","unstructured":"Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994, 6:284-90. 10.1037\/1040-3590.6.4.284","journal-title":"Psychol Assess"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcm.2016.02.012","article-title":"A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research","volume":"15","author":"Koo TK","year":"2016","unstructured":"Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016, 15:155-63. 10.1016\/j.jcm.2016.02.012","journal-title":"J Chiropr Med"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/508949-billing-opinion-reliability-score-100-a-structured-framework-for-billing-and-medicolegal-expert-reliability","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,11]],"date-time":"2026-07-11T14:07:24Z","timestamp":1783778844000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/508949-billing-opinion-reliability-score-100-a-structured-framework-for-billing-and-medicolegal-expert-reliability"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,11]]},"references-count":20,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.112462","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,11]]}}}