{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]],"date-time":"2026-07-20T00:01:43Z","timestamp":1784505703009,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":5,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,19]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.112966","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,19]],"date-time":"2026-07-19T23:14:25Z","timestamp":1784502865000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Beyond the Device: Why Provider-Side Factors Determine Upper-Limb Prosthesis Acceptance"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Mitsunori","family":"Toda","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/03093640600994581","article-title":"Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years","volume":"31","author":"Biddiss EA","year":"2007","unstructured":"Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007, 31:236-57. 10.1080\/03093640600994581","journal-title":"Prosthet Orthot Int"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2020.1866684","article-title":"Current rates of prosthetic usage in upper-limb amputees - have innovations had an impact on device acceptance?","volume":"44","author":"Salminger S","year":"2022","unstructured":"Salminger S, Stino H, Pichler LH, et al.. Current rates of prosthetic usage in upper-limb amputees - have innovations had an impact on device acceptance?. Disabil Rehabil. 2022, 44:3708-13. 10.1080\/09638288.2020.1866684","journal-title":"Disabil Rehabil"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/PHM.0b013e3181587f6c","article-title":"Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment","volume":"86","author":"Biddiss E","year":"2007","unstructured":"Biddiss E, Chau T. Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007, 86:977-87. 10.1097\/PHM.0b013e3181587f6c","journal-title":"Am J Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"ref4","article-title":"The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation","volume":"42","author":"Taub E","year":"2006","unstructured":"Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, Morris DM. The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Eura Medicophys. 2006, 42:241-56.","journal-title":"Eura Medicophys"},{"key":"ref5","article-title":"Immediate, early, and late postsurgical management of upper-limb amputation","volume":"21","author":"Malone JM","year":"1984","unstructured":"Malone JM, Fleming LL, Roberson J, Whitesides TE Jr, Leal JM, Poole JU, Grodin RS. Immediate, early, and late postsurgical management of upper-limb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1984, 21:33-41.","journal-title":"J Rehabil Res Dev"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/515139-beyond-the-device-why-provider-side-factors-determine-upper-limb-prosthesis-acceptance","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,19]],"date-time":"2026-07-19T23:14:26Z","timestamp":1784502866000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/515139-beyond-the-device-why-provider-side-factors-determine-upper-limb-prosthesis-acceptance"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,19]]},"references-count":5,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.112966","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,19]]}}}