{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]],"date-time":"2026-08-01T10:59:42Z","timestamp":1785581982708,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.113767","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]],"date-time":"2026-08-01T10:15:36Z","timestamp":1785579336000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Bioactive Glass-Based Materials Versus Conventional Materials for Primary Tooth Restorations: A Comparative Meta-Analysis"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Abdulaziz","family":"Zailai","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Abdullah","family":"Noor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dalal","family":"Alkhawari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Selwan","family":"Elsherbeny","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lubana","family":"Alsaffar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Budour O","family":"Alshaghdali","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rahaf","family":"Alsakran","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yousef A","family":"Al-Sultan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nasser F","family":"Aldhumayri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Walaa","family":"Alqudaihi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aisha A","family":"Adawi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tuqa I","family":"Alobayshi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shahad A","family":"Althamin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ali S","family":"Metwaly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10266-025-01162-w","article-title":"Bioactive restorative materials in dentistry: a comprehensive review of mechanisms, clinical applications, and future directions","volume":"114","author":"Abozaid D","year":"2026","unstructured":"Abozaid D, Azab A, Bahnsawy MA, et al.. Bioactive restorative materials in dentistry: a comprehensive review of mechanisms, clinical applications, and future directions. Odontology. 2026, 114:349-77. 10.1007\/s10266-025-01162-w","journal-title":"Odontology"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bdj.4801560","article-title":"Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation","volume":"193","author":"Duggal MS","year":"2002","unstructured":"Duggal MS, Toumba KJ, Sharma NK. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation. Br Dent J. 2002, 193:339-42. 10.1038\/sj.bdj.4801560","journal-title":"Br Dent J"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.14219\/jada.archive.1997.0366","article-title":"Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results","volume":"128","author":"Hse KM","year":"1997","unstructured":"Hse KM, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997, 128:1088-96. 10.14219\/jada.archive.1997.0366","journal-title":"J Am Dent Assoc"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.14219\/jada.archive.1999.0056","article-title":"Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations","volume":"130","author":"Donly KJ","year":"1999","unstructured":"Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson RL. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999, 130:1459-66. 10.14219\/jada.archive.1999.0056","journal-title":"J Am Dent Assoc"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000066531","article-title":"Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years","volume":"36","author":"Taifour D","year":"2002","unstructured":"Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N, van 't Hof MA, Truin GJ. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years. Caries Res. 2002, 36:437-44. 10.1159\/000066531","journal-title":"Caries Res"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/jpd.jpd_11_17","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic evaluation of glass ionomer compared to resin composite in restoring primary molars: a 1-year prospective randomized study","volume":"5","author":"Hamie S","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hamie S, Badr S, Ragab H. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of glass ionomer compared to resin composite in restoring primary molars: a 1-year prospective randomized study. J Pediatr Dent. 2017, 5:6-13. 10.4103\/jpd.jpd_11_17","journal-title":"J Pediatr Dent"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-263x.2003.00416.x","article-title":"Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study","volume":"13","author":"H\u00fcbel S","year":"2003","unstructured":"H\u00fcbel S, Mej\u00e0re I. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003, 13:2-8. 10.1046\/j.1365-263x.2003.00416.x","journal-title":"Int J Paediatr Dent"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s40368-018-0371-7","article-title":"Comparison of resin modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin in class II primary molar restorations: a 2-year parallel randomised clinical trial","volume":"19","author":"Dermata A","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dermata A, Papageorgiou SN, Fragkou S, Kotsanos N. Comparison of resin modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin in class II primary molar restorations: a 2-year parallel randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018, 19:393-401. 10.1007\/s40368-018-0371-7","journal-title":"Eur Arch Paediatr Dent"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3290\/j.qi.a33517","article-title":"Two-year clinical performance in primary teeth of nano-filled versus conventional resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations","volume":"46","author":"Abo-Hamar SE","year":"2015","unstructured":"Abo-Hamar SE, El-Desouky SS, Abu Hamila NA. Two-year clinical performance in primary teeth of nano-filled versus conventional resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Quintessence Int. 2015, 46:381-8. 10.3290\/j.qi.a33517","journal-title":"Quintessence Int"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2004.01.001","article-title":"Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results","volume":"32","author":"Qvist V","year":"2004","unstructured":"Qvist V, Manscher E, Teglers PT. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results. J Dent. 2004, 32:285-94. 10.1016\/j.jdent.2004.01.001","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bdj.4800693","article-title":"Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months","volume":"189","author":"Welbury RR","year":"2000","unstructured":"Welbury RR, Shaw AJ, Murray JJ, Gordon PH, McCabe JF. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months. Br Dent J. 2000, 189:93-7. 10.1038\/sj.bdj.4800693","journal-title":"Br Dent J"},{"key":"ref12","article-title":"Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation","volume":"19","author":"Dutta BN","year":"2001","unstructured":"Dutta BN, Gauba K, Tewari A, Chawla HS. Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2001, 19:118-22.","journal-title":"J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page MJ","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al.. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021, 372:71. 10.1136\/bmj.n71","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref14","unstructured":"Bioactive glass-based materials vs. conventional materials in primary tooth restorations. a comparative meta-analysis. (2026). https:\/\/www.crd.york.ac.uk\/PROSPERO\/view\/CRD420261329678."},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.11613\/BM.2012.031","article-title":"Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic","volume":"22","author":"McHugh ML","year":"2012","unstructured":"McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012, 22:276-82. 10.11613\/BM.2012.031","journal-title":"Biochem Med (Zagreb)"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","article-title":"RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"366","author":"Sterne JA","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sterne JA, Savovi\u0107 J, Page MJ, et al.. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019, 366:4898. 10.1136\/bmj.l4898","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4919","article-title":"ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions","volume":"355","author":"Sterne JA","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sterne JA, Hern\u00e1n MA, Reeves BC, et al.. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016, 355:4919. 10.1136\/bmj.i4919","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref18","unstructured":"The R Project for statistical computing. (2026). https.\/\/www.R-project.org\/."},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/ebmental-2019-300117","article-title":"How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial","volume":"22","author":"Balduzzi S","year":"2019","unstructured":"Balduzzi S, R\u00fccker G, Schwarzer G. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. Evid Based Ment Health. 2019, 22:153-60. 10.1136\/ebmental-2019-300117","journal-title":"Evid Based Ment Health"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v036.i03","article-title":"Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package","volume":"36","author":"Viechtbauer W","year":"2010","unstructured":"Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw. 2010, 36:1-48. 10.18637\/jss.v036.i03","journal-title":"J Stat Softw"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1164","article-title":"Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis","volume":"7","author":"Veroniki AA","year":"2016","unstructured":"Veroniki AA, Jackson D, Viechtbauer W, et al.. Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2016, 7:55-79. 10.1002\/jrsm.1164","journal-title":"Res Synth Methods"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-25","article-title":"The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method","volume":"14","author":"IntHout J","year":"2014","unstructured":"IntHout J, Ioannidis JP, Borm GF. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014, 14:25. 10.1186\/1471-2288-14-25","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins JP","year":"2003","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003, 327:557-60. 10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010","article-title":"Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry","volume":"61","author":"Peters JL","year":"2008","unstructured":"Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L. Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008, 61:991-6. 10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","article-title":"Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test","volume":"315","author":"Egger M","year":"1997","unstructured":"Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997, 315:629-34. 10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","article-title":"GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations","volume":"336","author":"Guyatt GH","year":"2008","unstructured":"Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Sch\u00fcnemann HJ. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008, 336:924-6. 10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/adj.12894","article-title":"Giomer composite compared to glass ionomer in occlusoproximal ART restorations of primary molars: 24-month RCT","volume":"67","author":"P\u00e1ssaro AL","year":"2022","unstructured":"P\u00e1ssaro AL, Oleg\u00e1rio IC, Laux CM, Oliveira RC, Tedesco TK, Raggio DP. Giomer composite compared to glass ionomer in occlusoproximal ART restorations of primary molars: 24-month RCT. Aust Dent J. 2022, 67:148-58. 10.1111\/adj.12894","journal-title":"Aust Dent J"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10005-2963","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial evaluating the clinical performance of bioactive restorative material and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in carious primary molar restorations","volume":"17","author":"Bhavana K","year":"2024","unstructured":"Bhavana K, Uloopi KS, Vinay C, Chaitanya P, Ramesh MV, Ahalya P. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the clinical performance of bioactive restorative material and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in carious primary molar restorations. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024, 17:1109-13. 10.5005\/jp-journals-10005-2963","journal-title":"Int J Clin Pediatr Dent"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-018-2593-9","article-title":"Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial","volume":"23","author":"Oleg\u00e1rio IC","year":"2019","unstructured":"Oleg\u00e1rio IC, Hesse D, Mendes FM, Bonif\u00e1cio CC, Raggio DP. Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019, 23:1761-70. 10.1007\/s00784-018-2593-9","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/children9030433","article-title":"One-year clinical performance of Activa\u2122 bioactive-restorative composite in primary molars","volume":"9","author":"Lardani L","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lardani L, Derchi G, Marchio V, Carli E. One-year clinical performance of Activa\u2122 bioactive-restorative composite in primary molars. Children (Basel). 2022, 9:433. 10.3390\/children9030433","journal-title":"Children (Basel)"},{"key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/jisppd.jisppd_139_22","article-title":"Clinical evaluation of bioactive resin-modified glass ionomer and giomer in restoring primary molars: a randomized, parallel-group, and split-mouth controlled clinical study","volume":"40","author":"Deepika U","year":"2022","unstructured":"Deepika U, Sahoo PK, Dash JK, Baliarsingh RR, Ray P, Sharma G. Clinical evaluation of bioactive resin-modified glass ionomer and giomer in restoring primary molars: a randomized, parallel-group, and split-mouth controlled clinical study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2022, 40:288-96. 10.4103\/jisppd.jisppd_139_22","journal-title":"J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent"},{"key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10005-2173","article-title":"New dual-cure resin-based material in occlusal and occluso-proximal restorations of primary teeth: results of a randomized clinical trial","volume":"15","author":"da Cunha CM","year":"2022","unstructured":"da Cunha CM, Wambier LM, Matos TP, et al.. New dual-cure resin-based material in occlusal and occluso-proximal restorations of primary teeth: results of a randomized clinical trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022, 15:38-46. 10.5005\/jp-journals-10005-2173","journal-title":"Int J Clin Pediatr Dent"},{"key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10005-3188","article-title":"Evaluation of the clinical performance of strip crown restorations with composite resin vs glass hybrid restorative system for primary anterior teeth of children with early childhood caries: a double-blind parallel group randomized controlled trial","volume":"18","author":"Malik N","year":"2025","unstructured":"Malik N, Nayak R, Acharya S. Evaluation of the clinical performance of strip crown restorations with composite resin vs glass hybrid restorative system for primary anterior teeth of children with early childhood caries: a double-blind parallel group randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2025, 18:922-9. 10.5005\/jp-journals-10005-3188","journal-title":"Int J Clin Pediatr Dent"},{"key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-024-04132-w","article-title":"Two-year clinical and radiographic evaluation of ACTIVA BioACTIVE versus Compomer (Dyract\u00ae eXtra) in the restoration of class-2 cavities of primary molars: a non-inferior split-mouth randomised clinical trial","volume":"24","author":"Banon R","year":"2024","unstructured":"Banon R, Vandenbulcke J, Van Acker J, Martens L, De Coster P, Rajasekharan S. Two-year clinical and radiographic evaluation of ACTIVA BioACTIVE versus Compomer (Dyract\u00ae eXtra) in the restoration of class-2 cavities of primary molars: a non-inferior split-mouth randomised clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2024, 24:437. 10.1186\/s12903-024-04132-w","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0045-1811224","article-title":"The clinical performance of Activa bioactive composite compared to composite in restoring class II cavities in primary teeth: 1 year of split-mouth randomized clinical trial","volume":"20","author":"Shihabi S","year":"2026","unstructured":"Shihabi S, Al-Monaquel MB, Comisi JC. The clinical performance of Activa bioactive composite compared to composite in restoring class II cavities in primary teeth: 1 year of split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Eur J Dent. 2026, 20:818-24. 10.1055\/s-0045-1811224","journal-title":"Eur J Dent"},{"key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/njcp.njcp_519_19","article-title":"Clinical evaluation of bulk-fill resins and glass ionomer restorative materials: a 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial in children","volume":"23","author":"Akman H","year":"2020","unstructured":"Akman H, Tosun G. Clinical evaluation of bulk-fill resins and glass ionomer restorative materials: a 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial in children. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020, 23:489-97. 10.4103\/njcp.njcp_519_19","journal-title":"Niger J Clin Pract"},{"key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.22271\/oral.2020.v6.i4g.1098","article-title":"Clinical performance of Equia Forte: A glass hybrid GIC versus Tetric N Ceram; a bulk fill composite in class II carious primary molars: a 12 month split mouth clinical trial","volume":"6","author":"Shagale AM","year":"2020","unstructured":"Shagale AM, Aby H, Prabhakar AR, Deepak BM, Reddy GS. Clinical performance of Equia Forte: A glass hybrid GIC versus Tetric N Ceram; a bulk fill composite in class II carious primary molars: a 12 month split mouth clinical trial. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2020, 6:435-40. 10.22271\/oral.2020.v6.i4g.1098","journal-title":"Int J Appl Dent Sci"},{"key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10005-2709","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic evaluation of different glass ionomer restorative materials in primary molars: a comparative randomized clinical trial","volume":"16","author":"Kataria VG","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kataria VG, Patel MC, Bhatt R, Patel FC, Makwani DG, Joshi K. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of different glass ionomer restorative materials in primary molars: a comparative randomized clinical trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023, 16:829-36. 10.5005\/jp-journals-10005-2709","journal-title":"Int J Clin Pediatr Dent"},{"key":"ref39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21608\/edj.2018.78103","article-title":"Bioactive resin modified GIC vs. conventional one in vivo and in vitro study","volume":"64","author":"Beltagy TM","year":"2018","unstructured":"Beltagy TM, Elhatery AA. Bioactive resin modified GIC vs. conventional one in vivo and in vitro study. Egypt Dent J. 2018, 64:2917-31. 10.21608\/edj.2018.78103","journal-title":"Egypt Dent J"},{"key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21608\/dsu.2024.219258.1188","article-title":"Glass ionomer coating with nano-filled resin versus resin reinforced glass ionomer as a restorative materials for primary molars","volume":"5","author":"Mansour ME","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mansour ME, Farag SM, Mahfouz SM. Glass ionomer coating with nano-filled resin versus resin reinforced glass ionomer as a restorative materials for primary molars. Dent Sci Updat. 2024, 5:215-30. 10.21608\/dsu.2024.219258.1188","journal-title":"Dent Sci Updat"},{"key":"ref41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/ccd.ccd_809_18","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic success of three adhesive restorative materials in primary molar proximal lesions: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"10","author":"Inthihas SK","year":"2019","unstructured":"Inthihas SK, G Nirmala SV, Rudhravarm VR. Clinical and radiographic success of three adhesive restorative materials in primary molar proximal lesions: a randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Dent. 2019, 10:483-8. 10.4103\/ccd.ccd_809_18","journal-title":"Contemp Clin Dent"},{"key":"ref42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.17796\/1053-4628-39.4.315","article-title":"Clinical evaluation of restorative materials in primary teeth class II lesions","volume":"39","author":"Sengul F","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sengul F, Gurbuz T. Clinical evaluation of restorative materials in primary teeth class II lesions. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015, 39:315-21. 10.17796\/1053-4628-39.4.315","journal-title":"J Clin Pediatr Dent"},{"key":"ref43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.22514\/jocpd.2022.022","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of a bioactive restorative material with resin modified glass ionomer for calcium-ion release and shear bond strength to dentin of primary teeth-an in vitro study","volume":"46","author":"Bhatia K","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bhatia K, Nayak R, Ginjupalli K. Comparative evaluation of a bioactive restorative material with resin modified glass ionomer for calcium-ion release and shear bond strength to dentin of primary teeth-an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022, 46:25-32. 10.22514\/jocpd.2022.022","journal-title":"J Clin Pediatr Dent"},{"key":"ref44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/ipd.12346","article-title":"Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures","volume":"28","author":"Chisini LA","year":"2018","unstructured":"Chisini LA, Collares K, Cademartori MG, de Oliveira LJ, Conde MC, Demarco FF, Corr\u00eaa MB. Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018, 28:123-39. 10.1111\/ipd.12346","journal-title":"Int J Paediatr Dent"},{"key":"ref45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-009-0335-8","article-title":"Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review","volume":"14","author":"Mickenautsch S","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Banerjee A. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2010, 14:233-40. 10.1007\/s00784-009-0335-8","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"ref46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03262565","article-title":"Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature","volume":"8","author":"Chadwick BL","year":"2007","unstructured":"Chadwick BL, Evans DJ. Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2007, 8:14-21. 10.1007\/BF03262565","journal-title":"Eur Arch Paediatr Dent"},{"key":"ref47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2015.08.005","article-title":"Publication of statistically significant research findings in prosthodontics & implant dentistry in the context of other dental specialties","volume":"43","author":"Papageorgiou SN","year":"2015","unstructured":"Papageorgiou SN, Kloukos D, Petridis H, Pandis N. Publication of statistically significant research findings in prosthodontics & implant dentistry in the context of other dental specialties. J Dent. 2015, 43:1195-202. 10.1016\/j.jdent.2015.08.005","journal-title":"J Dent"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/518157-bioactive-glass-based-materials-versus-conventional-materials-for-primary-tooth-restorations-a-comparative-meta-analysis","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]],"date-time":"2026-08-01T10:15:38Z","timestamp":1785579338000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/518157-bioactive-glass-based-materials-versus-conventional-materials-for-primary-tooth-restorations-a-comparative-meta-analysis"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]]},"references-count":47,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.113767","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]]}}}