{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T12:39:07Z","timestamp":1786711147001,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.114523","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T12:08:10Z","timestamp":1786709290000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["In Vivo Comparison of Retention, Maximum Bite Force, and Patient Satisfaction Between Different Attachment Systems Used in Implant-Retained Overdentures"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Keerti","family":"Goyal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pardeep K","family":"Bansal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yashika","family":"Aggarwal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Akansha","family":"Gupta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gursimran","family":"Purba","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Preetika","family":"Bansal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9781119115397.ch10","article-title":"Mandibular implant overdenture treatment consensus and controversy","author":"Burns DR","year":"2015","unstructured":"Burns DR. Mandibular implant overdenture treatment consensus and controversy. J Prosthodont Dent Implants. 2015, 10.1002\/9781119115397.ch10","journal-title":"J Prosthodont Dent Implants"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-4052.176520","article-title":"An in vitro comparative study to evaluate the retention of different attachment systems used in implant-retained overdentures","volume":"16","author":"Shastry T","year":"2016","unstructured":"Shastry T, Anupama NM, Shetty S, Nalinakshamma M. An in vitro comparative study to evaluate the retention of different attachment systems used in implant-retained overdentures. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016, 16:159-66. 10.4103\/0972-4052.176520","journal-title":"J Indian Prosthodont Soc"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/cid.13428","article-title":"Clinical outcomes of bone-level and tissue-level short implants placed in posterior maxilla: a case-control study","volume":"27","author":"Lombardi T","year":"2025","unstructured":"Lombardi T, Rapani A, Ezeddine F, Perazzolo G, Di Lenarda R, Sivolella S, Stacchi C. Clinical outcomes of bone-level and tissue-level short implants placed in posterior maxilla: a case-control study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025, 27:e13428. 10.1111\/cid.13428","journal-title":"Clin Implant Dent Relat Res"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/ma14041051","article-title":"Ball versus Locator(\u00ae) attachments: a retrospective study on prosthetic maintenance and effect on oral-health-related quality of life","volume":"14","author":"Brandt S","year":"2021","unstructured":"Brandt S, Lauer HC, Fehrenz M, G\u00fcth JF, Romanos G, Winter A. Ball versus Locator(\u00ae) attachments: a retrospective study on prosthetic maintenance and effect on oral-health-related quality of life. Materials (Basel). 2021, 14:1051. 10.3390\/ma14041051","journal-title":"Materials (Basel)"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/jips.jips_368_19","article-title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of the attachments used in implant-supported overdentures","volume":"20","author":"Chaware SH","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chaware SH, Thakkar ST. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the attachments used in implant-supported overdentures. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020, 20:255-68. 10.4103\/jips.jips_368_19","journal-title":"J Indian Prosthodont Soc"},{"key":"ref6","article-title":"Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population","volume":"16","author":"Awad MA","year":"2003","unstructured":"Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, et al.. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Int J Prosthodont. 2003, 16:390-6.","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jobcr.2022.11.001","article-title":"The effect of ball versus locator attachment system on the performance of implant supported overdenture: a systematic review","volume":"13","author":"Gupta N","year":"2023","unstructured":"Gupta N, Bansal R, Shukla NK. The effect of ball versus locator attachment system on the performance of implant supported overdenture: a systematic review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2023, 13:44-55. 10.1016\/j.jobcr.2022.11.001","journal-title":"J Oral Biol Craniofac Res"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.83838","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of various implant overdenture attachment systems in terms of survival rate, tissue response, and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"17","author":"Patel S","year":"2025","unstructured":"Patel S, Vaishnav K. Comparative evaluation of various implant overdenture attachment systems in terms of survival rate, tissue response, and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2025, 17:e83838. 10.7759\/cureus.83838","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1741-2358.2002.00003.x","article-title":"The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients","volume":"19","author":"Feine JS","year":"2002","unstructured":"Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology. 2002, 19:3-4. 10.1111\/j.1741-2358.2002.00003.x","journal-title":"Gerodontology"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/IJDS.IJDS_96_18","article-title":"Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: an in vitro study","volume":"11","author":"Upinder S","year":"2019","unstructured":"Upinder S, Saluja BS, Gupta G, et al.. Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Sci. 2019, 11:65-70. 10.4103\/IJDS.IJDS_96_18","journal-title":"Indian J Dent Sci"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21608\/edj.2019.72927","article-title":"Effect of two different overdenture attachments on the biting force and occlusal force distribution","volume":"65","author":"Helmy MA","year":"2019","unstructured":"Helmy MA, Kothayer M. Effect of two different overdenture attachments on the biting force and occlusal force distribution. Egypt Dent J. 2019, 65:1723-32. 10.21608\/edj.2019.72927","journal-title":"Egypt Dent J"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1563\/AAID-JOI-D-10-00070","article-title":"A quality-of-life comparison between self-aligning and ball attachment systems for 2-implant-retained mandibular overdentures","volume":"37 Spec No","author":"Bilhan H","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bilhan H, Geckili O, Sulun T, Bilgin T. A quality-of-life comparison between self-aligning and ball attachment systems for 2-implant-retained mandibular overdentures. J Oral Implantol. 2011, 37 Spec No:167-73. 10.1563\/AAID-JOI-D-10-00070","journal-title":"J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"ref13","article-title":"Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial","volume":"27","author":"Krennmair G","year":"2012","unstructured":"Krennmair G, Seemann R, Fazekas A, Ewers R, Piehslinger E. Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012, 27:1560-8.","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/511087-in-vivo-comparison-of-retention-maximum-bite-force-and-patient-satisfaction-between-different-attachment-systems-used-in-implant-retained-overdentures","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T12:08:11Z","timestamp":1786709291000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/511087-in-vivo-comparison-of-retention-maximum-bite-force-and-patient-satisfaction-between-different-attachment-systems-used-in-implant-retained-overdentures"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]]},"references-count":13,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.114523","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]]}}}