{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,20]],"date-time":"2026-08-20T19:24:26Z","timestamp":1787253866813,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,20]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.114879","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,20]],"date-time":"2026-08-20T18:28:55Z","timestamp":1787250535000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Impella Versus Intra-aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock: Arrhythmias, Bleeding Complications, and In-Hospital Outcomes in a Propensity-Matched Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Maha","family":"Wazir","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Farhan","family":"Ullah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fahad","family":"Nasir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qaidar","family":"Alizai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehs264","article-title":"Improved outcome of cardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction: a report from the USIK 1995, USIC 2000, and FAST-MI French nationwide registries","volume":"33","author":"Aissaoui N","year":"2012","unstructured":"Aissaoui N, Puymirat E, Tabone X, et al.. Improved outcome of cardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction: a report from the USIK 1995, USIC 2000, and FAST-MI French nationwide registries. Eur Heart J. 2012, 33:2535-43. 10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehs264","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehv051","article-title":"Management of cardiogenic shock","volume":"36","author":"Thiele H","year":"2015","unstructured":"Thiele H, Ohman EM, Desch S, Eitel I, de Waha S. Management of cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. 2015, 36:1223-30. 10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehv051","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM197305102881901","article-title":"Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock. Report of a co-operative clinical trial","volume":"288","author":"Scheidt S","year":"1973","unstructured":"Scheidt S, Wilner G, Mueller H, et al.. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock. Report of a co-operative clinical trial. N Engl J Med. 1973, 288:979-84. 10.1056\/NEJM197305102881901","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/CCM.0000000000002676","article-title":"Advanced percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices for cardiogenic shock","volume":"45","author":"Miller PE","year":"2017","unstructured":"Miller PE, Solomon MA, McAreavey D. Advanced percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices for cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med. 2017, 45:1922-9. 10.1097\/CCM.0000000000002676","journal-title":"Crit Care Med"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ejhf.668","article-title":"Concomitant implantation of Impella(\u00ae) on top of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may improve survival of patients with cardiogenic shock","volume":"19","author":"Pappalardo F","year":"2017","unstructured":"Pappalardo F, Schulte C, Pieri M, et al.. Concomitant implantation of Impella(\u00ae) on top of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may improve survival of patients with cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017, 19:404-12. 10.1002\/ejhf.668","journal-title":"Eur J Heart Fail"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00392-019-01458-2","article-title":"Mechanical circulatory support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump or medical treatment in cardiogenic shock-a critical appraisal of current data","volume":"108","author":"Wernly B","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wernly B, Seelmaier C, Leistner D, et al.. Mechanical circulatory support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump or medical treatment in cardiogenic shock-a critical appraisal of current data. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019, 108:1249-57. 10.1007\/s00392-019-01458-2","journal-title":"Clin Res Cardiol"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2459\/JCM.0b013e3282f9abe7","article-title":"Feasibility and long-term safety of elective Impella-assisted high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a pilot two-centre study","volume":"9","author":"Burzotta F","year":"2008","unstructured":"Burzotta F, Paloscia L, Trani C, et al.. Feasibility and long-term safety of elective Impella-assisted high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a pilot two-centre study. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008, 9:1004-10. 10.2459\/JCM.0b013e3282f9abe7","journal-title":"J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038201","article-title":"Intraaortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: long-term 6-year outcome of the randomized IABP-shock II trial","volume":"139","author":"Thiele H","year":"2019","unstructured":"Thiele H, Zeymer U, Thelemann N, et al.. Intraaortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: long-term 6-year outcome of the randomized IABP-shock II trial. Circulation. 2019, 139:395-403. 10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038201","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijcard.2020.09.044","article-title":"Short term outcomes of Impella in cardiogenic shock: a review and meta-analysis of observational studies","volume":"324","author":"Iannaccone M","year":"2021","unstructured":"Iannaccone M, Albani S, Giannini F, et al.. Short term outcomes of Impella in cardiogenic shock: a review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Cardiol. 2021, 324:44-51. 10.1016\/j.ijcard.2020.09.044","journal-title":"Int J Cardiol"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.098194","article-title":"A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study","volume":"126","author":"O'Neill WW","year":"2012","unstructured":"O'Neill WW, Kleiman NS, Moses J, et al.. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study. Circulation. 2012, 126:1717-27. 10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.098194","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/openhrt-2018-000987","article-title":"Impella versus IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock","volume":"6","author":"Alushi B","year":"2019","unstructured":"Alushi B, Douedari A, Froehlig G, et al.. Impella versus IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Open Heart. 2019, 6:000987. 10.1136\/openhrt-2018-000987","journal-title":"Open Heart"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/17434440.2017.1374849","article-title":"Utilization of the Impella for hemodynamic support during percutaneous intervention and cardiogenic shock: an insight","volume":"14","author":"Nalluri N","year":"2017","unstructured":"Nalluri N, Patel N, Saouma S, et al.. Utilization of the Impella for hemodynamic support during percutaneous intervention and cardiogenic shock: an insight. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017, 14:789-804. 10.1080\/17434440.2017.1374849","journal-title":"Expert Rev Med Devices"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijcard.2015.07.065","article-title":"Impella ventricular support in clinical practice: collaborative viewpoint from a European expert user group","volume":"201","author":"Burzotta F","year":"2015","unstructured":"Burzotta F, Trani C, Doshi SN, et al.. Impella ventricular support in clinical practice: collaborative viewpoint from a European expert user group. Int J Cardiol. 2015, 201:684-91. 10.1016\/j.ijcard.2015.07.065","journal-title":"Int J Cardiol"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044007","article-title":"The evolving landscape of Impella use in the United States among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with mechanical circulatory support","volume":"141","author":"Amin AP","year":"2020","unstructured":"Amin AP, Spertus JA, Curtis JP, et al.. The evolving landscape of Impella use in the United States among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with mechanical circulatory support. Circulation. 2020, 141:273-84. 10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044007","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2009.09.018","article-title":"Supported high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device the Europella registry","volume":"54","author":"Sjauw KD","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sjauw KD, Konorza T, Erbel R, et al.. Supported high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device the Europella registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009, 54:2430-4. 10.1016\/j.jacc.2009.09.018","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2005.10.037","article-title":"Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5","volume":"97","author":"Henriques JP","year":"2006","unstructured":"Henriques JP, Remmelink M, Baan J Jr, et al.. Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5. Am J Cardiol. 2006, 97:990-2. 10.1016\/j.amjcard.2005.10.037","journal-title":"Am J Cardiol"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2008.11.005","article-title":"A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience","volume":"2","author":"Dixon SR","year":"2009","unstructured":"Dixon SR, Henriques JP, Mauri L, et al.. A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009, 2:91-6. 10.1016\/j.jcin.2008.11.005","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc Interv"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.resuscitation.2012.10.001","article-title":"Percutaneous left ventricular assistance in post cardiac arrest shock: comparison of intra aortic blood pump and IMPELLA Recover LP2.5","volume":"84","author":"Manzo-Silberman S","year":"2013","unstructured":"Manzo-Silberman S, Fichet J, Mathonnet A, et al.. Percutaneous left ventricular assistance in post cardiac arrest shock: comparison of intra aortic blood pump and IMPELLA Recover LP2.5. Resuscitation. 2013, 84:609-15. 10.1016\/j.resuscitation.2012.10.001","journal-title":"Resuscitation"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/17482941.2012.741244","article-title":"Comparison of Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: vascular complications and incidence of bleeding","volume":"14","author":"Boudoulas KD","year":"2012","unstructured":"Boudoulas KD, Pederzolli A, Saini U, et al.. Comparison of Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: vascular complications and incidence of bleeding. Acute Card Care. 2012, 14:120-4. 10.3109\/17482941.2012.741244","journal-title":"Acute Card Care"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jscr\/rjy302","article-title":"Additional unloading of the left ventricle using the Impella LP 2.5 during extracorporeal life support in cases of pulmonary congestion","volume":"2018","author":"Ise H","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ise H, Kitahara H, Aubin H, et al.. Additional unloading of the left ventricle using the Impella LP 2.5 during extracorporeal life support in cases of pulmonary congestion. J Surg Case Rep. 2018, 2018:302. 10.1093\/jscr\/rjy302","journal-title":"J Surg Case Rep"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2016.10.022","article-title":"Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support versus intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction","volume":"69","author":"Ouweneel DM","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ouweneel DM, Eriksen E, Sjauw KD, et al.. Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support versus intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017, 69:278-87. 10.1016\/j.jacc.2016.10.022","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.25270\/jic\/18.00252","article-title":"Outcomes of hemodynamic support with Impella for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock at a rural community hospital without on-site surgical back-up","volume":"31","author":"Wilkins CE","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wilkins CE, Herrera TL, Nagahiro MK, Weathers LB, Girotra SV, Sandhu F. Outcomes of hemodynamic support with Impella for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock at a rural community hospital without on-site surgical back-up. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019, 31:23-9. 10.25270\/jic\/18.00252","journal-title":"J Invasive Cardiol"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acvd.2026.02.001","article-title":"Experts' recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock","volume":"119","author":"Aissaoui N","year":"2026","unstructured":"Aissaoui N, Delmas C, Merdji H, et al.. Experts' recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2026, 119:370-89. 10.1016\/j.acvd.2026.02.001","journal-title":"Arch Cardiovasc Dis"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/496653-impella-versus-intra-aortic-balloon-pump-in-cardiogenic-shock-arrhythmias-bleeding-complications-and-in-hospital-outcomes-in-a-propensity-matched-analysis-of-the-national-inpatient-sample","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,20]],"date-time":"2026-08-20T18:28:56Z","timestamp":1787250536000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/496653-impella-versus-intra-aortic-balloon-pump-in-cardiogenic-shock-arrhythmias-bleeding-complications-and-in-hospital-outcomes-in-a-propensity-matched-analysis-of-the-national-inpatient-sample"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,20]]},"references-count":23,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.114879","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,20]]}}}