{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,30]],"date-time":"2026-08-30T05:15:29Z","timestamp":1788066929862,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,29]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.115417","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,30]],"date-time":"2026-08-30T04:19:06Z","timestamp":1788063546000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Continuous Mass Versus Layered Fascial Closure in Contaminated Emergency Midline Laparotomies: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Arunav","family":"Roy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hitesh","family":"Kumar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dipendra K","family":"Sinha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Somya","family":"Verma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ritvik","family":"Prakash","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Supriya","family":"Sahoo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Reema","family":"Bhagat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Neyaz","family":"Ahmad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Swetav","family":"Suman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nalini","family":"Singh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13017-023-00511-w","article-title":"ECLAPTE: Effective Closure of LAParoTomy in Emergency-2023 World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines for the closure of laparotomy in emergency settings","volume":"18","author":"Frassini S","year":"2023","unstructured":"Frassini S, Cobianchi L, Fugazzola P, et al.. ECLAPTE: Effective Closure of LAParoTomy in Emergency-2023 World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines for the closure of laparotomy in emergency settings. World J Emerg Surg. 2023, 18:42. 10.1186\/s13017-023-00511-w","journal-title":"World J Emerg Surg"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-009-0277-y","article-title":"Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model","volume":"34","author":"van Ramshorst GH","year":"2010","unstructured":"van Ramshorst GH, Nieuwenhuizen J, Hop WC, Arends P, Boom J, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model. World J Surg. 2010, 34:20-7. 10.1007\/s00268-009-0277-y","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znac302","article-title":"Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies","volume":"109","author":"Deerenberg EB","year":"2022","unstructured":"Deerenberg EB, Henriksen NA, Antoniou GA, et al.. Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies. Br J Surg. 2022, 109:1239-50. 10.1093\/bjs\/znac302","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)60459-7","article-title":"Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial","volume":"386","author":"Deerenberg EB","year":"2015","unstructured":"Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW, et al.. Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015, 386:1254-60. 10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)60459-7","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.2009.189","article-title":"Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"144","author":"Millbourn D","year":"2009","unstructured":"Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2009, 144:1056-9. 10.1001\/archsurg.2009.189","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znac194","article-title":"Effects of the short stitch technique for midline abdominal closure on incisional hernia (ESTOIH): randomized clinical trial","volume":"109","author":"Fortelny RH","year":"2022","unstructured":"Fortelny RH, Andrade D, Schirren M, et al.. Effects of the short stitch technique for midline abdominal closure on incisional hernia (ESTOIH): randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2022, 109:839-45. 10.1093\/bjs\/znac194","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2023.08.124","article-title":"Small bite versus large bite stitching technique for midline laparotomy wound closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"46","author":"Yii E","year":"2023","unstructured":"Yii E, Onggo J, Yii MK. Small bite versus large bite stitching technique for midline laparotomy wound closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg. 2023, 46:4719-26. 10.1016\/j.asjsur.2023.08.124","journal-title":"Asian J Surg"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/wjs.12619","article-title":"Small bites versus large bites for closure of midline abdominal incisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"49","author":"Alrashidi A","year":"2025","unstructured":"Alrashidi A, Hageen AW, Rifai M, et al.. Small bites versus large bites for closure of midline abdominal incisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2025, 49:1449-65. 10.1002\/wjs.12619","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13017-026-00681-3","article-title":"Interrupted versus continuous fascial closure after emergency midline laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"21","author":"Alharran AM","year":"2026","unstructured":"Alharran AM, Alsaid FA, Ali FA, et al.. Interrupted versus continuous fascial closure after emergency midline laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Emerg Surg. 2026, 21:10.1186\/s13017-026-00681-3","journal-title":"World J Emerg Surg"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0002-9610(98)00277-3","article-title":"Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis","volume":"176","author":"Weiland DE","year":"1998","unstructured":"Weiland DE, Bay RC, Del Sordi S. Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 1998, 176:666-70. 10.1016\/s0002-9610(98)00277-3","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD005661.pub2","article-title":"Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications","volume":"11","author":"Patel SV","year":"2017","unstructured":"Patel SV, Paskar DD, Nelson RL, Vedula SS, Steele SR. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017, 11:CD005661. 10.1002\/14651858.CD005661.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"ref12","article-title":"Does mass closure of midline laparotomies stand the test of time? A random control clinical trial","volume":"67","author":"Ausobsky JR","year":"1985","unstructured":"Ausobsky JR, Evans M, Pollock AV. Does mass closure of midline laparotomies stand the test of time? A random control clinical trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985, 67:159-61.","journal-title":"Ann R Coll Surg Engl"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4103\/2229-3485.71856","article-title":"Sample size estimation in clinical trial","volume":"1","author":"Sakpal TV","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sakpal TV. Sample size estimation in clinical trial. Perspect Clin Res. 2010, 1:67-9.","journal-title":"Perspect Clin Res"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1097\/00003246-198510000-00009","article-title":"APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system","volume":"13","author":"Knaus WA","year":"1985","unstructured":"Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985, 13:818-29.","journal-title":"Crit Care Med"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800780623","article-title":"Suture length to wound length ratio and the integrity of midline and lateral paramedian incisions","volume":"78","author":"Kendall SW","year":"1991","unstructured":"Kendall SW, Brennan TG, Guillou PJ. Suture length to wound length ratio and the integrity of midline and lateral paramedian incisions. Br J Surg. 1991, 78:705-7. 10.1002\/bjs.1800780623","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0138745","article-title":"Systematic review and meta-regression of factors affecting midline incisional hernia rates: analysis of 14,618 patients","volume":"10","author":"Bosanquet DC","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bosanquet DC, Ansell J, Abdelrahman T, et al.. Systematic review and meta-regression of factors affecting midline incisional hernia rates: analysis of 14,618 patients. PLoS One. 2015, 10:e0138745. 10.1371\/journal.pone.0138745","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13017-023-00517-4","article-title":"Continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy: CONTINT: a randomized controlled trial [NCT00544583]","volume":"18","author":"Polychronidis G","year":"2023","unstructured":"Polychronidis G, Rahbari NN, Bruckner T, et al.. Continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy: CONTINT: a randomized controlled trial [NCT00544583]. World J Emerg Surg. 2023, 18:51. 10.1186\/s13017-023-00517-4","journal-title":"World J Emerg Surg"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/TA.0000000000001970","article-title":"Interrupted versus continuous fascial closure in patients undergoing emergent laparotomy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"85","author":"Peponis T","year":"2018","unstructured":"Peponis T, Bohnen JD, Muse S, et al.. Interrupted versus continuous fascial closure in patients undergoing emergent laparotomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018, 85:459-65. 10.1097\/TA.0000000000001970","journal-title":"J Trauma Acute Care Surg"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20204678","article-title":"Prospective comparative study of modified Smead Jones versus conventional continuous method of fascial closure in emergency midline laparotomy","volume":"7","author":"Aghara CB","year":"2020","unstructured":"Aghara CB, Rajyaguru AM, Bhatt JG. Prospective comparative study of modified Smead Jones versus conventional continuous method of fascial closure in emergency midline laparotomy. Int Surg J. 2020, 7:3713-7. 10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20204678","journal-title":"Int Surg J"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20163541","article-title":"Comparative study of efficacy of modified continuous Smead-Jones versus interrupted method of midline laparotomy fascial closure for contaminated cases","volume":"3","author":"Dhamnaskar SS","year":"2016","unstructured":"Dhamnaskar SS, Sawarkar PC, Vijayakumaran P, Mandal S. Comparative study of efficacy of modified continuous Smead-Jones versus interrupted method of midline laparotomy fascial closure for contaminated cases. Int Surg J. 2016, 3:1751-6. 10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20163541","journal-title":"Int Surg J"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.48965","article-title":"Primary closure versus delayed primary closure of class III and IV surgical wounds following emergency laparotomy: a prospective comparative study","volume":"15","author":"Venkateswaran R","year":"2023","unstructured":"Venkateswaran R, Bhagvat S, Dutt A, Padekar HD, Mirkhushal N, Chetan AA. Primary closure versus delayed primary closure of class III and IV surgical wounds following emergency laparotomy: a prospective comparative study. Cureus. 2023, 15:e48965. 10.7759\/cureus.48965","journal-title":"Cureus"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/527164-continuous-mass-versus-layered-fascial-closure-in-contaminated-emergency-midline-laparotomies-a-prospective-observational-cohort-study","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,30]],"date-time":"2026-08-30T04:19:07Z","timestamp":1788063547000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/527164-continuous-mass-versus-layered-fascial-closure-in-contaminated-emergency-midline-laparotomies-a-prospective-observational-cohort-study"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,29]]},"references-count":21,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.115417","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,29]]}}}