{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T18:15:07Z","timestamp":1788459307304,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.115730","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T17:31:39Z","timestamp":1788456699000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison of Electrocautery and Scalpel Incisions in the Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Dhaval B","family":"Rathod","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Neha C","family":"Vyas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anish R","family":"Tiwari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Darshan D","family":"Patel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Garv J","family":"Chaudhari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Raj D","family":"Madhani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shrey D","family":"Patel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vishva S","family":"Rajyaguru","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/2321-6646.130379","article-title":"Electro surgery in dentistry: report of cases","volume":"2","author":"Babaji P","year":"2014","unstructured":"Babaji P, Singh V, Chawrasia VR, Jawale MR. Electro surgery in dentistry: report of cases. J Pediatr Dent. 2014, 2:20-4. 10.4103\/2321-6646.130379","journal-title":"J Pediatr Dent"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12663-017-1071-2","article-title":"Comparative analysis of radiosurgery and scalpel blade surgery in impacted mandibular third molar incisions: a clinical trial","volume":"17","author":"Kalia V","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kalia V, Siddiqui N, Kalra G. Comparative analysis of radiosurgery and scalpel blade surgery in impacted mandibular third molar incisions: a clinical trial. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2018, 17:458-65. 10.1007\/s12663-017-1071-2","journal-title":"J Maxillofac Oral Surg"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.53730\/ijhs.v6nS2.5443","article-title":"Assessment of treatment outcomes after using electrocautery and scalpel blade in separate patients for minor oral surgical procedure: a randomised controlled clinical trail","volume":"6","author":"Goyal R","year":"2022","unstructured":"Goyal R, Akhter J, Thapa G, et al.. Assessment of treatment outcomes after using electrocautery and scalpel blade in separate patients for minor oral surgical procedure: a randomised controlled clinical trail. Int J Health Sci. 2022, 6:2164-71. 10.53730\/ijhs.v6nS2.5443","journal-title":"Int J Health Sci"},{"key":"ref4","article-title":"Comparison of pain, wound healing, facial edema, and surgeon's comfort in surgical extraction of impacted third molars: surgical scalpel versus radiofrequency incision","volume":"5","author":"Fatahi Vanani N","year":"2020","unstructured":"Fatahi Vanani N, Golestaneh A, Malekigorji M. Comparison of pain, wound healing, facial edema, and surgeon's comfort in surgical extraction of impacted third molars: surgical scalpel versus radiofrequency incision. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci. 2020, 5:2-6.","journal-title":"J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci"},{"key":"ref5","article-title":"A comparative study of electrosurgery and scalpel surgery in minor oral surgery","volume":"9","author":"Jyotsna J","year":"2019","unstructured":"Jyotsna J, Jha SK. A comparative study of electrosurgery and scalpel surgery in minor oral surgery. Indian J Appl Res. 2019, 9:2249-555.","journal-title":"Indian J Appl Res"},{"key":"ref6","article-title":"A comparative study of electro-surgery and scalpel surgery","volume":"5","author":"Sharma NK","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sharma NK, Sachdeva SD. A comparative study of electro-surgery and scalpel surgery. Health Talk. 2012, 5:36-8.","journal-title":"Health Talk"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.06.093","article-title":"Cutting electrocautery versus scalpel for surgical incisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"220","author":"Ismail A","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ismail A, Abushouk AI, Elmaraezy A, et al.. Cutting electrocautery versus scalpel for surgical incisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2017, 220:147-63. 10.1016\/j.jss.2017.06.093","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"key":"ref8","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of pain response in operculectomy procedures using conventional, electrocautery and laser techniques","volume":"3","author":"Asok A","year":"2018","unstructured":"Asok A, Bhandary R, Shetty M. Comparative evaluation of pain response in operculectomy procedures using conventional, electrocautery and laser techniques. MJDS. 2018, 3:9-13.","journal-title":"MJDS"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4048\/jbc.2011.14.1.58","article-title":"Comparing scalpel, electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector effects: the impact on wound complications and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in wound fluid from mastectomy patients","volume":"14","author":"Yilmaz KB","year":"2011","unstructured":"Yilmaz KB, Dogan L, Nalbant H, et al.. Comparing scalpel, electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector effects: the impact on wound complications and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in wound fluid from mastectomy patients. J Breast Cancer. 2011, 14:58-63.","journal-title":"J Breast Cancer"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jobcr.2015.04.005","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of healing after gingivectomy with electrocautery and laser","volume":"5","author":"Kumar P","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kumar P, Rattan V, Rai S. Comparative evaluation of healing after gingivectomy with electrocautery and laser. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2015, 5:69-74. 10.1016\/j.jobcr.2015.04.005","journal-title":"J Oral Biol Craniofac Res"},{"key":"ref11","article-title":"Electrosurgery in dentistry","volume":"29","author":"Gnanasekhar JD","year":"1998","unstructured":"Gnanasekhar JD, Al-Duwairi YS. Electrosurgery in dentistry. Quintessence Int. 1998, 29:649-54.","journal-title":"Quintessence Int"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/ams.ams_158_18","article-title":"Evaluation of electrocautery and stainless steel scalpel in oral mucoperiosteal incision for mandibular anterior fracture","volume":"9","author":"Nagargoje GL","year":"2019","unstructured":"Nagargoje GL, Badal S, Mohiuddin SA, Balkunde AS, Jadhav SS, Bholane DR. Evaluation of electrocautery and stainless steel scalpel in oral mucoperiosteal incision for mandibular anterior fracture. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019, 9:230-4. 10.4103\/ams.ams_158_18","journal-title":"Ann Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"ref13","article-title":"A comparative analysis of cutting electrocautery and scalpel for performing cutaneous incisions over the neck - a prospective, randomized, single blind study","volume":"6","author":"Thakare GA","year":"2022","unstructured":"Thakare GA, Bhola N, Agarwal A, Ghavat C. A comparative analysis of cutting electrocautery and scalpel for performing cutaneous incisions over the neck - a prospective, randomized, single blind study. Acta Sci Dent Sci. 2022, 6:28-35.","journal-title":"Acta Sci Dent Sci"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0278-2391(87)90305-3","article-title":"Histologic evaluation of gingival response to an electrosurgical blade","volume":"45","author":"Kenneth LK","year":"1987","unstructured":"Kenneth LK, Robert FK, David HS, Allen RE. Histologic evaluation of gingival response to an electrosurgical blade. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987, 45:671-4. 10.1016\/0278-2391(87)90305-3","journal-title":"J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/s12663-012-0435-x","article-title":"Is Pederson Index a true predictive difficulty index for impacted mandibular third molar surgery? A meta-analysis","volume":"12","author":"Bali A","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bali A, Bali D, Sharma A, et al.. Is Pederson Index a true predictive difficulty index for impacted mandibular third molar surgery? A meta-analysis. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2013, 12:359-64.","journal-title":"J Maxillofac Oral Surg"},{"key":"ref16","article-title":"Measuring techniques and clinical testing of an anti-inflammatory agent (Tantum) (Article in German)","volume":"113","author":"Gabka J","year":"1971","unstructured":"Gabka J, Matsumura T. Measuring techniques and clinical testing of an anti-inflammatory agent (Tantum) (Article in German). M\u00fcnchener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 1971, 113:198-203.","journal-title":"M\u00fcnchener Medizinische Wochenschrift"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0194-5998(97)70277-8","article-title":"A comparison of mucosal incisions made by scalpel, CO2 laser, electrocautery, and constant-voltage electrocautery","volume":"116","author":"Liboon J","year":"1997","unstructured":"Liboon J, Funkhouser W, Terris DJ. A comparison of mucosal incisions made by scalpel, CO2 laser, electrocautery, and constant-voltage electrocautery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997, 116:379-85. 10.1016\/S0194-5998(97)70277-8","journal-title":"Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0030-4220(85)90003-9","article-title":"A comparison of healing and pain following excision of inflammatory papillary hyperplasia with electrosurgery and blade-loop knives in human patients","volume":"59","author":"Rathofer AS","year":"1985","unstructured":"Rathofer AS, Gardner MF, Vermilyea GS. A comparison of healing and pain following excision of inflammatory papillary hyperplasia with electrosurgery and blade-loop knives in human patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985, 59:130-5. 10.1016\/0030-4220(85)90003-9","journal-title":"Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20211817","article-title":"Comparison between scalpel incision and electrocautery incision in midline abdominal surgery: a comparative study","volume":"8","author":"Yadav A","year":"2021","unstructured":"Yadav A, Agarwal L, Jain SA, Kumawat S, Sharma S. Comparison between scalpel incision and electrocautery incision in midline abdominal surgery: a comparative study. Int Surg J. 2021, 8:1507-11.","journal-title":"Int Surg J"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12776","article-title":"Diathermy versus scalpel in transverse abdominal incision in women undergoing repeated cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"41","author":"Elbohoty AE","year":"2015","unstructured":"Elbohoty AE, Gomaa MF, Abdelaleim M, Abd-El-Gawad M, Elmarakby M. Diathermy versus scalpel in transverse abdominal incision in women undergoing repeated cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015, 41:1541-6. 10.1111\/jog.12776","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-010-4435-5","article-title":"Wound complications and clinical results of electrocautery versus a scalpel to create a cutaneous flap in thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized trial","volume":"41","author":"Uludag M","year":"2011","unstructured":"Uludag M, Yetkin G, Ozel A, Ozguven MBY, Yener S, Isgor A. Wound complications and clinical results of electrocautery versus a scalpel to create a cutaneous flap in thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Today. 2011, 41:1041-8. 10.1007\/s00595-010-4435-5","journal-title":"Surg Today"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1097\/IOP.0b013e31818acfce","article-title":"Clinicopathologic comparison of radiofrequency versus scalpel incision for upper blepharoplasty","volume":"24","author":"Kashkouli MB","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kashkouli MB, Kaghazkanani R, Mirzaie AZ, Hashemi M, Parvaresh MM, Sasanii L. Clinicopathologic comparison of radiofrequency versus scalpel incision for upper blepharoplasty. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008, 24:450-3.","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2016.06.172","article-title":"Comparison of radiofrequency and electrocautery with conventional scalpel incisions","volume":"74","author":"Hasar ZB","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hasar ZB, Ozmeric N, Ozdemir B, G\u00f6kmeno\u011flu C, Baris E, Altan G, Kahraman S. Comparison of radiofrequency and electrocautery with conventional scalpel incisions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016, 74:2136-41.","journal-title":"J Oral Maxillofac Surg"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/454081-comparison-of-electrocautery-and-scalpel-incisions-in-the-surgical-removal-of-impacted-mandibular-third-molars-a-prospective-randomized-clinical-study","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T17:31:42Z","timestamp":1788456702000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/454081-comparison-of-electrocautery-and-scalpel-incisions-in-the-surgical-removal-of-impacted-mandibular-third-molars-a-prospective-randomized-clinical-study"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]]},"references-count":23,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.115730","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]]}}}