{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,8]],"date-time":"2025-09-08T06:35:39Z","timestamp":1757313339783},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,9]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.14926","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,9]],"date-time":"2021-05-09T23:39:32Z","timestamp":1620603572000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Complications of Veress Needle Versus Open Technique in Abdominal Surgeries"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Ghassan I","family":"Alhajress","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ibrahim","family":"Al Babtain","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Abdullah","family":"Alsaghyir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hassan","family":"Arishi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2012\/305428","article-title":"Comparison of two entry methods for laparoscopic port entry: technical point of view [RETRACTED]","volume":"2012","author":"Toro A","year":"2012","unstructured":"Toro A, Mannino M, Cappello G, Di Stefano A, Di Carlo I. Comparison of two entry methods for laparoscopic port entry: technical point of view [RETRACTED]. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2012, 2012:305428. 10.1155\/2012\/305428","journal-title":"Diagn Ther Endosc"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-1216.51902","article-title":"Entry complications in laparoscopic surgery","volume":"1","author":"Krishnakumar S","year":"2009","unstructured":"Krishnakumar S, Tambe P. Entry complications in laparoscopic surgery. J Gynecol Endosc Surg. 2009, 1:4-11. 10.4103\/0974-1216.51902","journal-title":"J Gynecol Endosc Surg"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)35496-2","article-title":"Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications","volume":"29","author":"Vilos GA","year":"2007","unstructured":"Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J, Laberge PY; Clinical Practice Gynaecology Committee. Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007, 29:433-47. 10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)35496-2","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-008-9871-6","article-title":"Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramifications","volume":"22","author":"Varma R","year":"2008","unstructured":"Varma R, Gupta JK. Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramifications. Surg Endosc. 2008, 22:2686-97. 10.1007\/s00464-008-9871-6","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.09.035","article-title":"Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed- versus open-entry technique","volume":"190","author":"Jansen FW","year":"2004","unstructured":"Jansen FW, Kolkman W, Bakkum EA, de Kroon CD, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Trimbos JB. Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed- versus open-entry technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004, 190:634-8. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.09.035","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1308\/003588411X12851639107557","article-title":"Establishing pneumoperitoneum: Verres or Hasson? The debate continues","volume":"93","author":"Dunne N","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dunne N, Booth MI, Dehn TC. Establishing pneumoperitoneum: Verres or Hasson? The debate continues. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011, 93:22-4. 10.1308\/003588411X12851639107557","journal-title":"Ann R Coll Surg Engl"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0b013e328348bd61","article-title":"Laparoscopic entry techniques","volume":"23","author":"Deguara C","year":"2011","unstructured":"Deguara C, Davis C. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011, 23:268-72. 10.1097\/GCO.0b013e328348bd61","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10033-1244","article-title":"Veress needle for port-site closure","volume":"8","author":"Kotakala BK","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kotakala BK, Mishra RK. Veress needle for port-site closure. World J Lap Surg. 2015, 8:39-42. 10.5005\/jp-journals-10033-1244","journal-title":"World J Lap Surg"},{"key":"ref9","article-title":"Safety in laparoscopy","volume":"13","author":"Palmer R","year":"1974","unstructured":"Palmer R. Safety in laparoscopy. J Reprod Med. 1974, 13:1-5.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(71)90593-x","article-title":"A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy","volume":"110","author":"Hasson HM","year":"1971","unstructured":"Hasson HM. A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971, 110:886-7. 10.1016\/0002-9378(71)90593-x","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref11","article-title":"Open versus closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery","volume":"84","author":"Bonjer HJ","year":"1997","unstructured":"Bonjer HJ, Hazebroek EJ, Kazemier G, Giuffrida MC, Meijer WS, Lange JF. Open versus closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 1997, 84:599-602.","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0004-8666.2002.00246.x","article-title":"Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry","volume":"42","author":"Molloy D","year":"2002","unstructured":"Molloy D, Kaloo PD, Cooper M, Nguyen TV. Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002, 42:246-54. 10.1111\/j.0004-8666.2002.00246.x","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7860\/JCDR\/2016\/18049.7252","article-title":"Open versus closed laparoscopy: yet an unresolved controversy","volume":"10","author":"Taye MK","year":"2016","unstructured":"Taye MK, Fazal SA, Pegu D, Saikia D. Open versus closed laparoscopy: yet an unresolved controversy. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016, 10:QC04-7. 10.7860\/JCDR\/2016\/18049.7252","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1503\/cjs.011210","article-title":"Laparoscopic entry: a review of Canadian general surgical practice","volume":"54","author":"Compeau C","year":"2011","unstructured":"Compeau C, McLeod NT, Ternamian A. Laparoscopic entry: a review of Canadian general surgical practice. Can J Surg. 2011, 54:315-20. 10.1503\/cjs.011210","journal-title":"Can J Surg"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08134.x","article-title":"Open laparoscopy: the way forward","volume":"106","author":"Pickersgill A","year":"1999","unstructured":"Pickersgill A, Slade RJ, Falconer GF, Attwood S. Open laparoscopy: the way forward. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999, 106:1116-9. 10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08134.x","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s004640000337","article-title":"Trocar and Veress needle injuries during laparoscopy","volume":"15","author":"Sch\u00e4fer M","year":"2001","unstructured":"Sch\u00e4fer M, Lauper M, Kr\u00e4henb\u00fchl L. Trocar and Veress needle injuries during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2001, 15:275-80. 10.1007\/s004640000337","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/56147-complications-of-veress-needle-versus-open-technique-in-abdominal-surgeries","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,9]],"date-time":"2024-02-09T19:26:23Z","timestamp":1707506783000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/56147-complications-of-veress-needle-versus-open-technique-in-abdominal-surgeries"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,9]]},"references-count":16,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.14926","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,9]]}}}