{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,27]],"date-time":"2026-09-27T16:22:46Z","timestamp":1790526166042,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,2]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.16828","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,2]],"date-time":"2021-08-02T10:34:53Z","timestamp":1627900493000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"title":["Surgical and Patient Outcomes of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Khadija","family":"Alshowaikh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Katarzyna","family":"Karpinska-Leydier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jashvini","family":"Amirthalingam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gokul","family":"Paidi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anuruddhika  I","family":"Iroshani Jayarathna","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Divya Bala Anthony Manisha R","family":"Salibindla","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Huseyin Ekin","family":"Ergin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","article-title":"Choosing a route of hysterectomy for benign uterine disease","author":"Walters M","year":"2021","unstructured":"Walters M, Ferrando C. Choosing a route of hysterectomy for benign uterine disease. UpToDate. Sharp H, Eckler K (ed): UpToDate, Inc., Waltham, MA; 2021."},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12905-019-0784-4","article-title":"Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"19","author":"Lee SH","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lee SH, Oh SR, Cho YJ, et al.. Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Womens Health. 2019, 19:83. 10.1186\/s12905-019-0784-4","journal-title":"BMC Womens Health"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1200\/JOP.2011.000484","article-title":"Use and benefits of laparoscopic hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer among Medicare beneficiaries","volume":"8","author":"Wright JD","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wright JD, Neugut AI, Wilde ET, Buono DL, Tsai WY, Hershman DL. Use and benefits of laparoscopic hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer among Medicare beneficiaries. J Oncol Pract. 2012, 8:e89-99. 10.1200\/JOP.2011.000484","journal-title":"J Oncol Pract"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hlpt.2020.03.003","article-title":"The shifting trends towards a robotically-assisted surgical interface: clinical and financial implications","volume":"9","author":"Abitbol J","year":"2020","unstructured":"Abitbol J, Munir A, How J, et al.. The shifting trends towards a robotically-assisted surgical interface: clinical and financial implications. Health Policy Technol. 2020, 9:157-65.","journal-title":"Health Policy Technol"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2016.00026","article-title":"Robotic surgery in gynecology","volume":"3","author":"Bouquet de Joliniere J","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bouquet de Joliniere J, Librino A, Dubuisson JB, et al.. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Front Surg. 2016, 3:26. 10.3389\/fsurg.2016.00026","journal-title":"Front Surg"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5152\/jtgga.2015.0156","article-title":"Application of da Vinci(\u00ae) Robot in simple or radical hysterectomy: tips and tricks","volume":"17","author":"Iavazzo C","year":"2016","unstructured":"Iavazzo C, Gkegkes ID. Application of da Vinci(\u00ae) Robot in simple or radical hysterectomy: tips and tricks. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2016, 17:106-9. 10.5152\/jtgga.2015.0156","journal-title":"J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5152\/jtgga.2016.16187","article-title":"Robotic surgery in gynecology","volume":"17","author":"Alkatout I","year":"2016","unstructured":"Alkatout I, Mettler L, Maass N, Ackermann J. Robotic surgery in gynecology. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2016, 17:224-32. 10.5152\/jtgga.2016.16187","journal-title":"J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000286","article-title":"New developments in minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery","volume":"60","author":"Stewart KI","year":"2017","unstructured":"Stewart KI, Fader AN. New developments in minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017, 60:330-48. 10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000286","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.07.028","article-title":"Use and outcomes of minimally invasive hysterectomy for women with nonendometrioid endometrial cancers","volume":"219","author":"Nieto VL","year":"2018","unstructured":"Nieto VL, Huang Y, Hou JY, et al.. Use and outcomes of minimally invasive hysterectomy for women with nonendometrioid endometrial cancers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018, 219:463.e1-e12. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.07.028","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2018.08.019","article-title":"Impact of laparoscopic hysterectomy on quality of life","volume":"26","author":"Fortin C","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fortin C, Hur C, Falcone T. Impact of laparoscopic hysterectomy on quality of life. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019, 26:219-32. 10.1016\/j.jmig.2018.08.019","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.6004\/jnccn.2017.0086","article-title":"Minimally invasive techniques for treating gynecologic malignancies","volume":"15","author":"Fader AN","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fader AN. Minimally invasive techniques for treating gynecologic malignancies. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2017, 15:730-2. 10.6004\/jnccn.2017.0086","journal-title":"J Natl Compr Cancer Netw"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000491","article-title":"To robot or not to robot: the use of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery","volume":"63","author":"Lim CS","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lim CS, Griffith KC, Travieso J, As-Sanie S. To robot or not to robot: the use of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2020, 63:327-36. 10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000491","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page MJ","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al.. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021, 372:n71. 10.1136\/bmj.n71","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.14293","article-title":"Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer: a retrospective, single-center study","volume":"46","author":"Aiko K","year":"2020","unstructured":"Aiko K, Kanno K, Yanai S, et al.. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer: a retrospective, single-center study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020, 46:1157-64. 10.1111\/jog.14293","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.832","article-title":"Classification of postoperative complications in robotic-assisted compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer","volume":"23","author":"Barrie A","year":"2016","unstructured":"Barrie A, Freeman AH, Lyon L, et al.. Classification of postoperative complications in robotic-assisted compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016, 23:1181-8. 10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.832","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2018.01.010","article-title":"Robotic, laparoscopic, or open hysterectomy: surgical outcomes by approach in endometrial cancer","volume":"25","author":"Beck TL","year":"2018","unstructured":"Beck TL, Schiff MA, Goff BA, Urban RR. Robotic, laparoscopic, or open hysterectomy: surgical outcomes by approach in endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018, 25:986-93. 10.1016\/j.jmig.2018.01.010","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4274\/jtgga.2018.0018","article-title":"Outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for benign conditions in obese patients","volume":"19","author":"Borahay MA","year":"2018","unstructured":"Borahay MA, Tap\u0131s\u0131z \u00d6L, Alanbay \u0130, K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 GS. Outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for benign conditions in obese patients. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2018, 19:72-7. 10.4274\/jtgga.2018.0018","journal-title":"J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2020.04.038","article-title":"Effects of obesity on peri- and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic versus conventional hysterectomy","volume":"28","author":"Brunes M","year":"2021","unstructured":"Brunes M, Johannesson U, H\u00e4bel H, S\u00f6derberg MW, Ek M. Effects of obesity on peri- and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic versus conventional hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021, 28:228-36. 10.1016\/j.jmig.2020.04.038","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.12998\/wjcc.v7.i20.3185","article-title":"Comparative analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer","volume":"7","author":"Chen L","year":"2019","unstructured":"Chen L, Liu LP, Wen N, Qiao X, Meng YG. Comparative analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. World J Clin Cases. 2019, 7:3185-93. 10.12998\/wjcc.v7.i20.3185","journal-title":"World J Clin Cases"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12001","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial comparing operative times between standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy","volume":"136","author":"Deimling TA","year":"2017","unstructured":"Deimling TA, Eldridge JL, Riley KA, Kunselman AR, Harkins GJ. Randomized controlled trial comparing operative times between standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017, 136:64-9. 10.1002\/ijgo.12001","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4143\/crt.2020.802","article-title":"Nationwide comparison of surgical and oncologic outcomes in endometrial cancer patients undergoing robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery: a population-based cohort study","volume":"53","author":"Eoh KJ","year":"2021","unstructured":"Eoh KJ, Nam EJ, Kim SW, Shin M, Kim SJ, Kim JA, Kim YT. Nationwide comparison of surgical and oncologic outcomes in endometrial cancer patients undergoing robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery: a population-based cohort study. Cancer Res Treat. 2021, 53:549-57. 10.4143\/crt.2020.802","journal-title":"Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.05.008","article-title":"Total laparoscopic (S-LPS) versus TELELAP ALF-X robotic-assisted hysterectomy: a case-control study","volume":"23","author":"Fanfani F","year":"2016","unstructured":"Fanfani F, Restaino S, Rossitto C, et al.. Total laparoscopic (S-LPS) versus TELELAP ALF-X robotic-assisted hysterectomy: a case-control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016, 23:933-8. 10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.05.008","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13258","article-title":"Value of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer by body mass index","volume":"150","author":"Gracia M","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gracia M, Garc\u00eda-Santos J, Ramirez M, Bell\u00f3n M, Herraiz MA, Coronado PJ. Value of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer by body mass index. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020, 150:398-405. 10.1002\/ijgo.13258","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2015.11.006","article-title":"Telelap ALF-X vs standard laparoscopy for the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer: a single-institution retrospective cohort study","volume":"23","author":"Gueli Alletti S","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gueli Alletti S, Rossitto C, Cianci S, et al.. Telelap ALF-X vs standard laparoscopy for the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer: a single-institution retrospective cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016, 23:378-83. 10.1016\/j.jmig.2015.11.006","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-017-0699-8","article-title":"Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic","volume":"12","author":"Gungor M","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gungor M, Kahraman K, Dursun P, Ozbasli E, Genim C. Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic. J Robot Surg. 2018, 12:87-92. 10.1007\/s11701-017-0699-8","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-019-05148-2","article-title":"Safety and effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer in China","volume":"300","author":"Han L","year":"2019","unstructured":"Han L, Yan P, Yao L, et al.. Safety and effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer in China. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019, 300:153-60. 10.1007\/s00404-019-05148-2","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2018.12.004","article-title":"Survival after a nationwide introduction of robotic surgery in women with early-stage endometrial cancer: a\u00a0population-based prospective cohort study","volume":"109","author":"J\u00f8rgensen SL","year":"2019","unstructured":"J\u00f8rgensen SL, Mogensen O, Wu CS, Korsholm M, Lund K, Jensen PT. Survival after a nationwide introduction of robotic surgery in women with early-stage endometrial cancer: a\u00a0population-based prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2019, 109:1-11. 10.1016\/j.ejca.2018.12.004","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-016-0651-3","article-title":"Clinical comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy procedures for endometrial cancer patients","volume":"11","author":"Johnson L","year":"2017","unstructured":"Johnson L, Bunn WD, Nguyen L, Rice J, Raj M, Cunningham MJ. Clinical comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy procedures for endometrial cancer patients. J Robot Surg. 2017, 11:291-7. 10.1007\/s11701-016-0651-3","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.005","article-title":"Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for\u00a0endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"215","author":"M\u00e4enp\u00e4\u00e4 MM","year":"2016","unstructured":"M\u00e4enp\u00e4\u00e4 MM, Nieminen K, Tom\u00e1s EI, Laurila M, Luukkaala TH, M\u00e4enp\u00e4\u00e4 JU. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for\u00a0endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016, 215:588.e1-7. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-017-0674-4","article-title":"Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights","volume":"11","author":"Moawad GN","year":"2017","unstructured":"Moawad GN, Abi Khalil ED, Tyan P, et al.. Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights. J Robot Surg. 2017, 11:433-9. 10.1007\/s11701-017-0674-4","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0231793","article-title":"Choosing the most appropriate minimally invasive approach to treat gynecologic cancers in the context of an enhanced recovery program: insights from a comprehensive cancer center","volume":"15","author":"Netter A","year":"2020","unstructured":"Netter A, Jauffret C, Brun C, Sabiani L, Blache G, Houvenaeghel G, Lambaudie E. Choosing the most appropriate minimally invasive approach to treat gynecologic cancers in the context of an enhanced recovery program: insights from a comprehensive cancer center. PLoS One. 2020, 15:e0231793. 10.1371\/journal.pone.0231793","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.08.005","article-title":"Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy for uterine leiomyomas: a comparison of complications and costs","volume":"40","author":"Ngan TY","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ngan TY, Zakhari A, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Tulandi T, Abenhaim HA. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy for uterine leiomyomas: a comparison of complications and costs. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018, 40:432-9. 10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.08.005","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0000000000001101","article-title":"Robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy results in better surgical outcomes compared with the traditional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical cancer","volume":"27","author":"Nie JC","year":"2017","unstructured":"Nie JC, Yan AQ, Liu XS. Robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy results in better surgical outcomes compared with the traditional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017, 27:1990-9. 10.1097\/IGC.0000000000001101","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13858","article-title":"Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a single-center study","volume":"45","author":"Oyama K","year":"2019","unstructured":"Oyama K, Kanno K, Kojima R, Shirane A, Yanai S, Ota Y, Andou M. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a single-center study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019, 45:405-11. 10.1111\/jog.13858","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"ref35","article-title":"Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical type-b and c hysterectomy for cervical cancer: long term-outcomes","volume":"88","author":"Pellegrino A","year":"2017","unstructured":"Pellegrino A, Damiani GR, Loverro M, Pirovano C, Fachechi G, Corso S, Trojano G. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical type-b and c hysterectomy for cervical cancer: long term-outcomes. Acta Biomed. 2017, 88:289-96.","journal-title":"Acta Biomed"},{"key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12749","article-title":"Outcomes in women undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy at a tertiary hospital in Western Australia","volume":"58","author":"Rajadurai VA","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rajadurai VA, Tan J, Salfinger SG, Cohen PA. Outcomes in women undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy at a tertiary hospital in Western Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018, 58:443-8. 10.1111\/ajo.12749","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4293\/JSLS.2018.00068","article-title":"Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for the large uterus","volume":"23","author":"Sinha R","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sinha R, Bana R, Sanjay M. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for the large uterus. JSLS. 2019, 23:10.4293\/JSLS.2018.00068","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4274\/jtgga.galenos.2020.2019.0187","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy; comparison of early surgical outcomes","volume":"21","author":"Takmaz \u00d6","year":"2020","unstructured":"Takmaz \u00d6, G\u00fcng\u00f6r M. Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy; comparison of early surgical outcomes. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2020, 21:260-4. 10.4274\/jtgga.galenos.2020.2019.0187","journal-title":"J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/62415-surgical-and-patient-outcomes-of-robotic-versus-conventional-laparoscopic-hysterectomy-a-systematic-review","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,9]],"date-time":"2024-02-09T14:33:25Z","timestamp":1707489205000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/62415-surgical-and-patient-outcomes-of-robotic-versus-conventional-laparoscopic-hysterectomy-a-systematic-review"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,2]]},"references-count":38,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.16828","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,2]]}}}