{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,10]],"date-time":"2024-02-10T00:19:00Z","timestamp":1707524340161},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.17653","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]],"date-time":"2021-09-01T21:57:36Z","timestamp":1630533456000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Less Invasive Decompressive Laminectomy and One-Level Lumbar Fusion in the Setting of Interspinous Fixation: A Retrospective Analysis of 15 Patients"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Hamidreza","family":"Aliabadi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Manika S","family":"Paul","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mari","family":"Kusumi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Barry","family":"Chehrazi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200103000-00016","article-title":"Lumbar stenosis: a clinical review","author":"Arbit E","year":"2001","unstructured":"Arbit E, Pannullo S. Lumbar stenosis: a clinical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001, 137-43.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0199623","article-title":"Interspinous process devices for treatment of degenerative lumbar spine stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"13","author":"Poetscher AW","year":"2018","unstructured":"Poetscher AW, Gentil AF, Ferretti M, Lenza M. Interspinous process devices for treatment of degenerative lumbar spine stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018, 13:e0199623. 10.1371\/journal.pone.0199623","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199405310-00002","article-title":"Low back pain hospitalization. Recent United States trends and regional variations","volume":"19","author":"Taylor VM","year":"1994","unstructured":"Taylor VM, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Kreuter W. Low back pain hospitalization. Recent United States trends and regional variations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994, 19:1207-13. 10.1097\/00007632-199405310-00002","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199173060-00002","article-title":"Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis","volume":"73","author":"Herkowitz HN","year":"1991","unstructured":"Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991, 73:802-8.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199306150-00006","article-title":"A prospective, randomized study of lumbar fusion. Preliminary results","volume":"18","author":"Zdeblick TA","year":"1993","unstructured":"Zdeblick TA. A prospective, randomized study of lumbar fusion. Preliminary results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993, 18:983-91. 10.1097\/00007632-199306150-00006","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.1998.89.3.0371","article-title":"Efficacy of pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of spinal instability and failed back surgery: a 5-year review","volume":"89","author":"Masferrer R","year":"1998","unstructured":"Masferrer R, Gomez CH, Karahalios DG, Sonntag VK. Efficacy of pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of spinal instability and failed back surgery: a 5-year review. J Neurosurg. 1998, 89:371-7. 10.3171\/jns.1998.89.3.0371","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.1992.77.6.0860","article-title":"Transpedicular screw-rod fixation of the lumbar spine: operative technique and outcome in 104 cases","volume":"77","author":"Dickman CA","year":"1992","unstructured":"Dickman CA, Fessler RG, MacMillan M, Haid RW. Transpedicular screw-rod fixation of the lumbar spine: operative technique and outcome in 104 cases. J Neurosurg. 1992, 77:860-70. 10.3171\/jns.1992.77.6.0860","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.04.002","article-title":"Comparison of minimally invasive spine surgery using intraoperative computed tomography integrated navigation, fluoroscopy, and conventional open surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective registry-based cohort study","volume":"17","author":"Wu MH","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wu MH, Dubey NK, Li YY, Lee CY, Cheng CC, Shi CS, Huang TJ. Comparison of minimally invasive spine surgery using intraoperative computed tomography integrated navigation, fluoroscopy, and conventional open surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective registry-based cohort study. Spine J. 2017, 17:1082-90. 10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.04.002","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3340\/jkns.2012.52.4.359","article-title":"Posterior interspinous fusion device for one-level fusion in degenerative lumbar spine disease: comparison with pedicle screw fixation - preliminary report of at least one year follow up","volume":"52","author":"Kim HJ","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kim HJ, Bak KH, Chun HJ, Oh SJ, Kang TH, Yang MS. Posterior interspinous fusion device for one-level fusion in degenerative lumbar spine disease: comparison with pedicle screw fixation - preliminary report of at least one year follow up. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012, 52:359-64. 10.3340\/jkns.2012.52.4.359","journal-title":"J Korean Neurosurg Soc"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2012\/325095","article-title":"The microendoscopic decompression of lumbar stenosis: a review of the current literature and clinical results","volume":"2012","author":"Wong AP","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wong AP, Smith ZA, Lall RR, Bresnahan LE, Fessler RG. The microendoscopic decompression of lumbar stenosis: a review of the current literature and clinical results. Minim Invasive Surg. 2012, 2012:325095. 10.1155\/2012\/325095","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Surg"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.12.SPINE13994","article-title":"Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction","volume":"23","author":"den Boogert HF","year":"2015","unstructured":"den Boogert HF, Keers JC, Marinus Oterdoom DL, Kuijlen JM. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015, 23:326-35. 10.3171\/2014.12.SPINE13994","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f6415","article-title":"Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial","volume":"347","author":"Moojen WA","year":"2013","unstructured":"Moojen WA, Arts MP, Jacobs WC, et al.. Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2013, 347:f6415. 10.1136\/bmj.f6415","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.11.001","article-title":"Effectiveness of a decision-making protocol for the surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis with Grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"110","author":"Staartjes VE","year":"2018","unstructured":"Staartjes VE, Schr\u00f6der ML. Effectiveness of a decision-making protocol for the surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis with Grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis. World Neurosurg. 2018, 110:e355-61. 10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.11.001","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.11.SPINE13597","article-title":"Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates","volume":"22","author":"Alimi M","year":"2015","unstructured":"Alimi M, Hofstetter CP, Pyo SY, Paulo D, H\u00e4rtl R. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015, 22:339-52. 10.3171\/2014.11.SPINE13597","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2005.3.2.0129","article-title":"Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy","volume":"3","author":"Thom\u00e9 C","year":"2005","unstructured":"Thom\u00e9 C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, B\u00e4zner H, P\u00f6ckler-Sch\u00f6niger C, W\u00f6hrle J, Schmiedek P. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005, 3:129-41. 10.3171\/spi.2005.3.2.0129","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5137\/1019-5149.JTN.8710-13.1","article-title":"A comparison of bilateral decompression via unilateral approach and classic laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective clinical study","volume":"25","author":"Yaman O","year":"2015","unstructured":"Yaman O, Ozdemir N, Dagli AT, Acar E, Dalbayrak S, Temiz C. A comparison of bilateral decompression via unilateral approach and classic laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective clinical study. Turk Neurosurg. 2015, 25:239-45. 10.5137\/1019-5149.JTN.8710-13.1","journal-title":"Turk Neurosurg"},{"key":"ref17","unstructured":"Interspinous distraction devices and interspinous fixation (fusion) devices. (2019). Accessed. September 1, 2021: https:\/\/www.wellmark.com\/provider\/medpoliciesandauthorizations\/medicalpolicies\/policies\/interspinous_distraction_devi...."},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568217699192","article-title":"Radiographic risk factors of reoperation following minimally invasive decompression for lumbar canal stenosis associated with degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis","volume":"7","author":"Kato M","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kato M, Namikawa T, Matsumura A, Konishi S, Nakamura H. Radiographic risk factors of reoperation following minimally invasive decompression for lumbar canal stenosis associated with degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis. Global Spine J. 2017, 7:498-505. 10.1177\/2192568217699192","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.4.SPINE13420","article-title":"Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article","volume":"21","author":"Mobbs RJ","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mobbs RJ, Li J, Sivabalan P, Raley D, Rao PJ. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014, 21:179-86. 10.3171\/2014.4.SPINE13420","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"ref20","article-title":"Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis","volume":"51","author":"Khoo LT","year":"2002","unstructured":"Khoo LT, Fessler RG. Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery. 2002, 51:S146-54.","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.10.SPINE09305","article-title":"Biomechanics of a lumbar interspinous anchor with anterior lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"12","author":"Karahalios DG","year":"2010","unstructured":"Karahalios DG, Kaibara T, Porter RW, et al.. Biomechanics of a lumbar interspinous anchor with anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010, 12:372-80. 10.3171\/2009.10.SPINE09305","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.4.SPINE14274","article-title":"Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: lumbar fusion for stenosis with spondylolisthesis","volume":"21","author":"Resnick DK","year":"2014","unstructured":"Resnick DK, Watters WC 3rd, Sharan A, et al.. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: lumbar fusion for stenosis with spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014, 21:54-61. 10.3171\/2014.4.SPINE14274","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000411","article-title":"Lumbar spinous process fixation and fusion: a systematic review and critical analysis of an emerging spinal technology","volume":"30","author":"Lopez AJ","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lopez AJ, Scheer JK, Dahdaleh NS, Patel AA, Smith ZA. Lumbar spinous process fixation and fusion: a systematic review and critical analysis of an emerging spinal technology. Clin Spine Surg. 2017, 30:E1279-88. 10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000411","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.5.FOCUS17188","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"43","author":"Mummaneni PV","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mummaneni PV, Bisson EF, Kerezoudis P, et al.. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database. Neurosurg Focus. 2017, 43:E11. 10.3171\/2017.5.FOCUS17188","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.1290","article-title":"Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with rigid interspinous process fixation: a learning curve analysis of a surgeon team's first 74 cases","volume":"9","author":"Doherty P","year":"2017","unstructured":"Doherty P, Welch A, Tharpe J, Moore C, Ferry C. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with rigid interspinous process fixation: a learning curve analysis of a surgeon team's first 74 cases. Cureus. 2017, 9:e1290. 10.7759\/cureus.1290","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.4.SPINE12636","article-title":"Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial: clinical article","volume":"19","author":"Davis R","year":"2013","unstructured":"Davis R, Auerbach JD, Bae H, Errico TJ. Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013, 19:174-84. 10.3171\/2013.4.SPINE12636","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/44050-less-invasive-decompressive-laminectomy-and-one-level-lumbar-fusion-in-the-setting-of-interspinous-fixation-a-retrospective-analysis-of-15-patients","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,9]],"date-time":"2024-02-09T19:28:56Z","timestamp":1707506936000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/44050-less-invasive-decompressive-laminectomy-and-one-level-lumbar-fusion-in-the-setting-of-interspinous-fixation-a-retrospective-analysis-of-15-patients"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]]},"references-count":26,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.17653","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]]}}}