{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T06:00:50Z","timestamp":1787032850598,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,30]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.18405","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,30]],"date-time":"2021-09-30T14:20:23Z","timestamp":1633011623000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Single- Versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure After Cesarean Section Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Kaif","family":"Qayum","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Irfan","family":"Kar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Junaid","family":"Sofi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hari","family":"Panneerselvam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0140-6736(18)31928-7","article-title":"Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections","volume":"392","author":"Boerma T","year":"2018","unstructured":"Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al.. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018, 392:1341-8. 10.1016\/s0140-6736(18)31928-7","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0140-6736(18)31930-5","article-title":"Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children","volume":"392","author":"Sandall J","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, et al.. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018, 392:1349-57. 10.1016\/s0140-6736(18)31930-5","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00204-X","article-title":"Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial","volume":"388","author":"Abalos E","year":"2016","unstructured":"Abalos E, Addo V, Brocklehurst P, et al.. Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016, 388:62-72. 10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00204-X","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13199","article-title":"Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review","volume":"43","author":"Bij de Vaate AJ","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bij de Vaate AJ, van der Voet LF, Naji O, et al.. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014, 43:372-82. 10.1002\/uog.13199","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12479","article-title":"Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis","volume":"42","author":"Kok N","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kok N, Wiersma IC, Opmeer BC, de Graaf IM, Mol BW, Pajkrt E. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013, 42:132-9. 10.1002\/uog.12479","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12542","article-title":"Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"121","author":"van der Voet LF","year":"2014","unstructured":"van der Voet LF, Bij de Vaate AM, Veersema S, Br\u00f6lmann HA, Huirne JA. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG. 2014, 121:236-44. 10.1111\/1471-0528.12542","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.014","article-title":"Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis","volume":"211","author":"Roberge S","year":"2014","unstructured":"Roberge S, Demers S, Berghella V, Chaillet N, Moore L, Bujold E. Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014, 211:453-60. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16472","article-title":"Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial","volume":"128","author":"Stegwee SI","year":"2021","unstructured":"Stegwee SI, van der Voet LF, Ben AJ, et al.. Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial. BJOG. 2021, 128:866-78. 10.1111\/1471-0528.16472","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15048","article-title":"Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"125","author":"Stegwee SI","year":"2018","unstructured":"Stegwee SI, Jordans I, van der Voet LF, et al.. Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2018, 125:1097-108. 10.1111\/1471-0528.15048","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref10","article-title":"","author":"Higgins JP","year":"2019","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK; 2019."},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000100","article-title":"The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration","volume":"6","author":"Liberati A","year":"2009","unstructured":"Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al.. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009, 6:e1000100. 10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000100","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d5928","article-title":"The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"343","author":"Higgins JP","year":"2011","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Altman DG, G\u00f8tzsche PC, et al.. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011, 343:d5928. 10.1136\/bmj.d5928","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02686.x","article-title":"Caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised factorial trial (CAESAR)","volume":"117","author":"The CAESAR study collaborative group","year":"2010","unstructured":"The CAESAR study collaborative group. Caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised factorial trial (CAESAR). BJOG. 2010, 117:1366-76. 10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02686.x","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-112223","article-title":"A prospective randomized clinical trial of single vs. double layer closure of hysterotomy at the time of cesarean delivery: the effect on uterine scar thickness","volume":"39","author":"Bamberg C","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bamberg C, Dudenhausen JW, Bujak V, et al.. A prospective randomized clinical trial of single vs. double layer closure of hysterotomy at the time of cesarean delivery: the effect on uterine scar thickness. Ultraschall Med. 2018, 39:343-51. 10.1055\/s-0042-112223","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15792","article-title":"Impact of adding a second layer to a single unlocked closure of a Cesarean uterine incision: randomized controlled trial","volume":"47","author":"Bennich G","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bennich G, Rudnicki M, Wilken-Jensen C, Lousen T, Lassen PD, W\u00f8jdemann K. Impact of adding a second layer to a single unlocked closure of a Cesarean uterine incision: randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016, 47:417-22. 10.1002\/uog.15792","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0029-7844(97)84257-3","article-title":"One- versus two-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy","volume":"89","author":"Chapman SJ","year":"1997","unstructured":"Chapman SJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. One- versus two-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997, 89:16-8. 10.1016\/s0029-7844(97)84257-3","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21608\/scumj.2018.43594","article-title":"Effect of single versus double layer suturing on healing of uterine scar after cesarean delivery","volume":"21","author":"Khamees RE","year":"2018","unstructured":"Khamees RE, Khedr AH, Shaaban M, Bahi-Eldin M. Effect of single versus double layer suturing on healing of uterine scar after cesarean delivery. Suez Canal Univ Med J. 2018, 21:140-5. 10.21608\/scumj.2018.43594","journal-title":"Suez Canal Univ Med J"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/2278-960X.112591","article-title":"Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar thickness after single versus double layer closure of transverse lower segment cesarean section","volume":"2","author":"ELGharib MN","year":"2013","unstructured":"ELGharib MN, Awara AM. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar thickness after single versus double layer closure of transverse lower segment cesarean section. J Basic Clin Reprod Sci. 2013, 2:42-5. 10.4103\/2278-960X.112591","journal-title":"J Basic Clin Reprod Sci"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000284628.29796.80","article-title":"Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure","volume":"110","author":"Hamar BD","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hamar BD, Saber SB, Cackovic M, et al.. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure. Obstet Gynecol. 2007, 110:808-13. 10.1097\/01.AOG.0000284628.29796.80","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13714","article-title":"Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one\u00a0year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure","volume":"99","author":"Hanacek J","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hanacek J, Vojtech J, Urbankova I, Krcmar M, K\u0159epelka P, Feyereisl J, Krofta L. Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one\u00a0year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020, 99:69-78. 10.1111\/aogs.13714","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0002-9378(12)80048-2","article-title":"Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers","volume":"167","author":"Hauth JC","year":"1992","unstructured":"Hauth JC, Owen J, Davis RO. Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992, 167:1108-11. 10.1016\/s0002-9378(12)80048-2","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/08941939.2019.1610530","article-title":"An optimal uterine closure technique for better scar healing and avoiding isthmocele in cesarean section: a randomized controlled study","volume":"34","author":"Kalem Z","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kalem Z, Kaya AE, Bak\u0131rarar B, Basbug A, Kalem MN. An optimal uterine closure technique for better scar healing and avoiding isthmocele in cesarean section: a randomized controlled study. J Invest Surg. 2021, 34:148-56. 10.1080\/08941939.2019.1610530","journal-title":"J Invest Surg"},{"key":"ref23","article-title":"Single versus double layer closure of low transverse uterine incision at cesarean section","volume":"55","author":"Kumar SA","year":"2005","unstructured":"Kumar SA. Single versus double layer closure of low transverse uterine incision at cesarean section. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2005, 55:231-6.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol India"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916","article-title":"Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"214","author":"Roberge S","year":"2016","unstructured":"Roberge S, Demers S, Girard M, et al.. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016, 214:507.e1-6. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.11.013","article-title":"Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery","volume":"125","author":"Sevket O","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sevket O, Ates S, Molla T, Ozkal F, Uysal O, Dansuk R. Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014, 125:219-22. 10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.11.013","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.12691\/ajphr-3-5A-37","article-title":"Ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar in primary caesarean section: a study of single versus double layer uterine closure","volume":"3","author":"Shrestha P","year":"2015","unstructured":"Shrestha P, Shrestha S, Gyawali M. Ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar in primary caesarean section: a study of single versus double layer uterine closure. Am J Public Health Res. 2015, 3:178-81. 10.12691\/ajphr-3-5A-37","journal-title":"Am J Public Health Res"},{"key":"ref27","article-title":"Impact of methods for uterine incision closure on repeat caesarean section scar of lower uterine segment","volume":"21","author":"Yasmin S","year":"2011","unstructured":"Yasmin S, Sadaf J, Fatima N. Impact of methods for uterine incision closure on repeat caesarean section scar of lower uterine segment. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2011, 21:522-6.","journal-title":"J Coll Physicians Surg Pak"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14018","article-title":"Single- or double-layer uterine closure techniques following cesarean: A randomized trial","volume":"100","author":"Y\u0131lmaz Baran \u015e","year":"2021","unstructured":"Y\u0131lmaz Baran \u015e, Kalayc\u0131 H, Do\u011fan Durda\u011f G, Yetkinel S, Alemdaro\u011flu S, \u00c7ok T, Bulgan K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7da\u011f E. Single- or double-layer uterine closure techniques following cesarean: A randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021, 100:531-7. 10.1111\/aogs.14018","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13015","article-title":"The risk of uterine rupture is not increased with single- compared with double-layer closure: a Swedish cohort study","volume":"122","author":"Hesselman S","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hesselman S, H\u00f6gberg U, Ekholm-Selling K, R\u00e5ssj\u00f6 EB, Jonsson M. The risk of uterine rupture is not increased with single- compared with double-layer closure: a Swedish cohort study. BJOG. 2015, 122:1535-41. 10.1111\/1471-0528.13015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2006.07.002","article-title":"Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology","volume":"30","author":"Menacker F","year":"2006","unstructured":"Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol. 2006, 30:235-41. 10.1053\/j.semperi.2006.07.002","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/72695-single--versus-double-layer-uterine-closure-after-cesarean-section-delivery-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,9]],"date-time":"2024-02-09T14:34:08Z","timestamp":1707489248000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/72695-single--versus-double-layer-uterine-closure-after-cesarean-section-delivery-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,30]]},"references-count":30,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.18405","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,30]]}}}