{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T17:37:27Z","timestamp":1790876247347,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,13]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.23133","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,14]],"date-time":"2022-03-14T03:44:56Z","timestamp":1647229496000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Cesarean Audit Using Robson Classification at a Tertiary Care Center in Bihar: A Retrospective Study"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Pammy","family":"Pravina","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ranjana","family":"Ranjana","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Neeru","family":"Goel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","unstructured":"WHO statement on caesarean section rates. (2021). Accessed. April 12, 2021: http:\/\/www.who.int\/reproductivehealth\/publications\/maternal_perinatal_health\/cs-statement\/en\/."},{"key":"ref2","unstructured":"NHS maternity statistics, England 2016-17. (2019). Accessed. January 30, 2022: https:\/\/digital.nhs.uk\/data-and-information\/publications\/statistical\/nhs-maternity-statistics\/2016-17."},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5455\/2320-1770.ijrcog20140979","article-title":"Rising caesarean section rate: a matter of concern?","volume":"3","author":"Wanjari SA","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wanjari SA. Rising caesarean section rate: a matter of concern?. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2014, 3:728-31. 10.5455\/2320-1770.ijrcog20140979","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12444","article-title":"Risk of retained placenta in women previously delivered by caesarean section: a population-based cohort study","volume":"121","author":"Belachew J","year":"2014","unstructured":"Belachew J, Cnattingius S, Mulic-Lutvica A, Eurenius K, Axelsson O, Wikstr\u00f6m AK. Risk of retained placenta in women previously delivered by caesarean section: a population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2014, 121:224-9. 10.1111\/1471-0528.12444","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/beog.2000.0156","article-title":"Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?","volume":"15","author":"Robson MS","year":"2001","unstructured":"Robson MS. Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001, 15:179-94. 10.1053\/beog.2000.0156","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2016.08.001","article-title":"Best practice advice on the 10-Group Classification System for cesarean deliveries","volume":"135","year":"2016","unstructured":"Best practice advice on the 10-Group Classification System for cesarean deliveries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016, 135.232-3. 10.1016\/j.ijgo.2016.08.001","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1625-9","article-title":"Implementation of the Robson classification in clinical practice: Lithuania's experience","volume":"17","author":"Kacerauskiene J","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kacerauskiene J, Bartuseviciene E, Railaite DR, et al.. Implementation of the Robson classification in clinical practice: Lithuania's experience. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017, 17:432. 10.1186\/s12884-017-1625-9","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.29271\/jcpsp.2019.08.768","article-title":"An audit of caesarean section rate using modified Robson criteria at a tertiary care hospital","volume":"29","author":"Ansari A","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ansari A, Baqai S, Imran R. An audit of caesarean section rate using modified Robson criteria at a tertiary care hospital. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019, 29:768-70. 10.29271\/jcpsp.2019.08.768","journal-title":"J Coll Physicians Surg Pak"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-020-03474-x","article-title":"Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study","volume":"20","author":"Abubeker FA","year":"2020","unstructured":"Abubeker FA, Gashawbeza B, Gebre TM, Wondafrash M, Teklu AM, Degu D, Bekele D. Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020, 20:767. 10.1186\/s12884-020-03474-x","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1644619","article-title":"Changing rates of the modes of delivery over the decades (1976, 1986, 1996, 2006, and 2016) based on the Robson-10 group classification system in a single tertiary health care center","volume":"34","author":"Cagan M","year":"2021","unstructured":"Cagan M, Tanacan A, Aydin Hakli D, Beksac MS. Changing rates of the modes of delivery over the decades (1976, 1986, 1996, 2006, and 2016) based on the Robson-10 group classification system in a single tertiary health care center. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021, 34:1695-702. 10.1080\/14767058.2019.1644619","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-019-01275-7","article-title":"Trend prediction for cesarean deliveries based on Robson classification system at a tertiary referral unit of North India","volume":"70","author":"Mittal P","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mittal P, Pandey D, Suri J, Bharti R. Trend prediction for cesarean deliveries based on Robson classification system at a tertiary referral unit of North India. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020, 70:111-8. 10.1007\/s13224-019-01275-7","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol India"},{"key":"ref12","article-title":"Assessing cesarean section trends in a tertiary care teaching hospital using Robson\u2019s ten group classification","volume":"4","author":"Naik M","year":"2021","unstructured":"Naik M, Rani S, Ratnani R. Assessing cesarean section trends in a tertiary care teaching hospital using Robson\u2019s ten group classification. Int J Health Clin Res. 2021, 4:215-8.","journal-title":"Int J Health Clin Res"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(15)70094-X","article-title":"Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys","volume":"3","author":"Vogel JP","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vogel JP, Betr\u00e1n AP, Vindevoghel N, et al.. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015, 3:e260-70. 10.1016\/S2214-109X(15)70094-X","journal-title":"Lancet Glob Health"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18535\/jmscr\/v6i9.28","article-title":"Analysis of caeserian section rate using Robson\u2019s classification in a tertiary care hospital of eastern Odisha","volume":"6","author":"Pati T","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pati T, Marandi S, Mohapatra S. Analysis of caeserian section rate using Robson\u2019s classification in a tertiary care hospital of eastern Odisha. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2018, 6:157-61. 10.18535\/jmscr\/v6i9.28","journal-title":"J Med Sci Clin Res"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.20473\/mog.V27I22019.66-70","article-title":"Classifying cesarean section using Robson classification: an Indonesian tertiary hospital survey","volume":"27","author":"Sungkar A","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sungkar A, Santoso BI, Surya R, Fattah NA. Classifying cesarean section using Robson classification: an Indonesian tertiary hospital survey. Maj Obs Gin. 2019, 27:66-70. 10.20473\/mog.V27I22019.66-70","journal-title":"Maj Obs Gin"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18535\/jmscr\/v5i8.31","article-title":"Increasing trend of caesarean rates in India: evidence from NFHS-4","volume":"5","author":"Radhakrishnan T","year":"2017","unstructured":"Radhakrishnan T, Vasanthakumari KP, Babu PK. Increasing trend of caesarean rates in India: evidence from NFHS-4. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2017, 5:26167-76. 10.18535\/jmscr\/v5i8.31","journal-title":"J Med Sci Clin Res"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","article-title":"Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates","volume":"6","author":"Betran AP","year":"2021","unstructured":"Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021, 6:10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","journal-title":"BMJ Glob Health"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-020520","article-title":"Analysis of caesarean sections using Robson 10-group classification system in a university hospital in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study","volume":"8","author":"Tura AK","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tura AK, Pijpers O, de Man M, Cleveringa M, Koopmans I, Gure T, Stekelenburg J. Analysis of caesarean sections using Robson 10-group classification system in a university hospital in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018, 8:e020520. 10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-020520","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18203\/2349-3291.ijcp20182963","article-title":"The rate and indication of caesarean section in a tertiary care teaching hospital eastern India","volume":"5","author":"Das RK","year":"2018","unstructured":"Das RK, Subudhi KT, Mohanty RK. The rate and indication of caesarean section in a tertiary care teaching hospital eastern India. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2018, 5:1733-9. 10.18203\/2349-3291.ijcp20182963","journal-title":"Int J Contemp Pediatr"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.31729\/jnma.4282","article-title":"Prevalence of cesarean section and its indications in a tertiary care hospital","volume":"57","author":"Maskey S","year":"2019","unstructured":"Maskey S, Bajracharya M, Bhandari S. Prevalence of cesarean section and its indications in a tertiary care hospital. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2019, 57:70-3. 10.31729\/jnma.4282","journal-title":"JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18203\/2320-1770.ijrcog20170916","article-title":"A cross sectional study of 1000 lower segment cesarean section in obstetrics and gynecology department of P. D. U Medical College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India","volume":"6","author":"Chavda D","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chavda D, Goswam K, Dudhrejiya K. A cross sectional study of 1000 lower segment cesarean section in obstetrics and gynecology department of P. D. U Medical College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017, 6:1186-91. 10.18203\/2320-1770.ijrcog20170916","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.11604\/pamj.2017.26.64.9555","article-title":"Indications and appropriateness of caesarean sections performed in a tertiary referral centre in Uganda: a retrospective descriptive study","volume":"26","author":"Nelson JP","year":"2017","unstructured":"Nelson JP. Indications and appropriateness of caesarean sections performed in a tertiary referral centre in Uganda: a retrospective descriptive study. Pan Afr Med J. 2017, 26:64. 10.11604\/pamj.2017.26.64.9555","journal-title":"Pan Afr Med J"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18203\/2320-1770.ijrcog20201819","article-title":"Study of caesarean section at tertiary care center: a retrospective study","volume":"9","author":"Kose V","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kose V, Sadhvi K. Study of caesarean section at tertiary care center: a retrospective study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020, 9:2138-43. 10.18203\/2320-1770.ijrcog20201819","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref24","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Birth after previous caesarean birth (green-top guideline No. 45). (2015). Accessed. January 30, 2022: https:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/en\/guidelines-research-services\/guidelines\/gtg45\/."},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12479","article-title":"Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis","volume":"42","author":"Kok N","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kok N, Wiersma IC, Opmeer BC, de Graaf IM, Mol BW, Pajkrt E. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013, 42:132-9. 10.1002\/uog.12479","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181d992fb","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months","volume":"115","author":"Bujold E","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months. Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 115:1003-6. 10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181d992fb","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003025","article-title":"Obstetric care consensus no. 8: interpregnancy care","volume":"133","year":"2019","unstructured":"Obstetric care consensus no. 8. interpregnancy care. Obstet Gynecol. 2019, 133:e51-72. 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003025","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000286759.49895.46","article-title":"Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"110","author":"Stamilio DM","year":"2007","unstructured":"Stamilio DM, DeFranco E, Par\u00e9 E, et al.. Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007, 110:1075-82. 10.1097\/01.AOG.0000286759.49895.46","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d","article-title":"Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"123","year":"2014","unstructured":"Obstetric care consensus no. 1. safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014, 123:693-711. 10.1097\/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/83128-cesarean-audit-using-robson-classification-at-a-tertiary-care-center-in-bihar-a-retrospective-study","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,9]],"date-time":"2024-02-09T19:41:28Z","timestamp":1707507688000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/83128-cesarean-audit-using-robson-classification-at-a-tertiary-care-center-in-bihar-a-retrospective-study"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,13]]},"references-count":29,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.23133","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,13]]}}}