{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,18]],"date-time":"2026-10-18T10:08:25Z","timestamp":1792318105850,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,17]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.23244","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,17]],"date-time":"2022-03-17T07:56:22Z","timestamp":1647503782000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Outcome Comparison of Totally Implantable Venous Access Device Insertions Between Surgeons and Radiologists in Australia"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Darius","family":"Dastouri","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"William T","family":"McSweeney","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthew","family":"Leaning","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rasika","family":"Hendahewa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suronc.2012.02.003","article-title":"Update on totally implantable venous access devices","volume":"21","author":"Zaghal A","year":"2012","unstructured":"Zaghal A, Khalife M, Mukherji D, et al.. Update on totally implantable venous access devices. Surg Oncol. 2012, 21:207-15. 10.1016\/j.suronc.2012.02.003","journal-title":"Surg Oncol"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/000313481708301214","article-title":"Percutaneous versus cut-down technique for indwelling port placement","volume":"83","author":"Matiotti-Neto M","year":"2017","unstructured":"Matiotti-Neto M, Eskander MF, Tabatabaie O, et al.. Percutaneous versus cut-down technique for indwelling port placement. Ann Surg. 2017, 83:1336-42. 10.1177\/000313481708301214","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s1470-2045(02)00905-1","article-title":"Totally implantable venous-access ports: local problems and extravasation injury","volume":"3","author":"Kurul S","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kurul S, Saip P, Aydin T. Totally implantable venous-access ports: local problems and extravasation injury. Lancet Oncol. 2002, 3:684-92. 10.1016\/s1470-2045(02)00905-1","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-010-1005-4","article-title":"Increased use of percutaneous technique for totally implantable venous access devices. Is it real progress? A 27-year comprehensive review on early complications","volume":"17","author":"Di Carlo I","year":"2010","unstructured":"Di Carlo I, Pulvirenti E, Mannino M, Toro A. Increased use of percutaneous technique for totally implantable venous access devices. Is it real progress? A 27-year comprehensive review on early complications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010, 17:1649-56. 10.1245\/s10434-010-1005-4","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000003705","article-title":"Primary open versus closed implantation strategy for totally implantable venous access ports: the multicentre randomized controlled PORTAS-3 trial (DRKS 00004900)","volume":"272","author":"H\u00fcttner FJ","year":"2020","unstructured":"H\u00fcttner FJ, Bruckner T, Hackbusch M, et al.. Primary open versus closed implantation strategy for totally implantable venous access ports: the multicentre randomized controlled PORTAS-3 trial (DRKS 00004900). Ann Surg. 2020, 272:950-60. 10.1097\/SLA.0000000000003705","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2482-14-27","article-title":"Totally implantable venous access devices: retrospective analysis of different insertion techniques and predictors of complications in 796 devices implanted in a single institution","volume":"14","author":"Granziera E","year":"2014","unstructured":"Granziera E, Scarpa M, Ciccarese A, et al.. Totally implantable venous access devices: retrospective analysis of different insertion techniques and predictors of complications in 796 devices implanted in a single institution. BMC Surg. 2014, 14:27. 10.1186\/1471-2482-14-27","journal-title":"BMC Surg"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.6457","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of a modified Seldinger technique for open central venous cannulation for implantable access devices","volume":"96","author":"Knebel P","year":"2009","unstructured":"Knebel P, Fischer L, Huesing J, Hennes R, B\u00fcchler MW, Seiler CM. Randomized clinical trial of a modified Seldinger technique for open central venous cannulation for implantable access devices. Br J Surg. 2009, 96:159-65. 10.1002\/bjs.6457","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003246-200202000-00031","article-title":"Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access\u2014a systematic review","volume":"30","author":"Ruesch S","year":"2002","unstructured":"Ruesch S, Walder B, Tram\u00e8r MR. Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access\u2014a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2002, 30:454-60. 10.1097\/00003246-200202000-00031","journal-title":"Crit Care Med"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.11138\/gchir\/2016.37.5.211","article-title":"Totally implantable central venous catheters of the port-a-cath type: complications due to its use in the treatment of cancer patients","volume":"19","author":"Granic M","year":"2014","unstructured":"Granic M, Zdravkovic D, Krstajic S, et al.. Totally implantable central venous catheters of the port-a-cath type: complications due to its use in the treatment of cancer patients. J BUON. 2014, 19:842-6. 10.11138\/gchir\/2016.37.5.211","journal-title":"J BUON"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000140451","article-title":"Venous access ports: frequency and management of complications in oncology patients","volume":"31","author":"Jordan K","year":"2008","unstructured":"Jordan K, Behlendorf T, Surov A, Kegel T, Maher G, Wolf HH. Venous access ports: frequency and management of complications in oncology patients. Onkologie. 2008, 31:404-10. 10.1159\/000140451","journal-title":"Onkologie"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aeh109","article-title":"Long-term central venous access","volume":"92","author":"Galloway S","year":"2004","unstructured":"Galloway S, Bodenham A. Long-term central venous access. Br J Anaesth. 2004, 92:722-34. 10.1093\/bja\/aeh109","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e318214ba21","article-title":"Insertion of totally implantable venous access devices: an expertise-based, randomized, controlled trial (NCT00600444)","volume":"253","author":"Knebel P","year":"2011","unstructured":"Knebel P, Lopez-Benitez R, Fischer L, et al.. Insertion of totally implantable venous access devices: an expertise-based, randomized, controlled trial (NCT00600444). Ann Surg. 2011, 253:1111-7. 10.1097\/SLA.0b013e318214ba21","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9276","article-title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous subclavian vein puncture versus surgical venous cutdown for the insertion of a totally implantable venous access device","volume":"101","author":"Orci LA","year":"2014","unstructured":"Orci LA, Meier RP, Morel P, Staszewicz W, Toso C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous subclavian vein puncture versus surgical venous cutdown for the insertion of a totally implantable venous access device. Br J Surg. 2014, 101:8-16. 10.1002\/bjs.9276","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-015-0043-1","article-title":"Closed cannulation of subclavian vein vs open cut-down of cephalic vein for totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) implantation: protocol for a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of perioperative and postoperative complications","volume":"4","author":"Klaiber U","year":"2015","unstructured":"Klaiber U, Grummich K, Jensen K, et al.. Closed cannulation of subclavian vein vs open cut-down of cephalic vein for totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) implantation: protocol for a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of perioperative and postoperative complications. Syst Rev. 2015, 4:53. 10.1186\/s13643-015-0043-1","journal-title":"Syst Rev"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/89811-outcome-comparison-of-totally-implantable-venous-access-device-insertions-between-surgeons-and-radiologists-in-australia","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,9]],"date-time":"2024-02-09T19:35:47Z","timestamp":1707507347000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/89811-outcome-comparison-of-totally-implantable-venous-access-device-insertions-between-surgeons-and-radiologists-in-australia"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,17]]},"references-count":14,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.23244","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,17]]}}}