{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,10]],"date-time":"2026-10-10T19:23:31Z","timestamp":1791660211071,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,12]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.38938","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,12]],"date-time":"2023-05-12T14:22:33Z","timestamp":1683901353000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Clinical Equivalence of Monoglyde\u00ae and Monocryl\u00ae Absorbable Poliglecaprone-25 Sutures: A Single-Blind, Randomized Study"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"MPA","family":"Sailakshmi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sukanta","family":"Misra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sathyashree","family":"HS","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Soukhin","family":"Acharya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ashok K","family":"Moharana","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Deepak","family":"TS","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0148343","article-title":"The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: Global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014","volume":"11","author":"Betr\u00e1n AP","year":"2016","unstructured":"Betr\u00e1n AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, G\u00fclmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: Global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016, 11:e0148343. 10.1371\/journal.pone.0148343","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-020-03010-x","article-title":"Decision-to-delivery interval of emergency cesarean section in Uganda: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"20","author":"Hughes NJ","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hughes NJ, Namagembe I, Nakimuli A, Sekikubo M, Moffett A, Patient CJ, Aiken CE. Decision-to-delivery interval of emergency cesarean section in Uganda: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020, 20:324. 10.1186\/s12884-020-03010-x","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004120","article-title":"The case for standardizing cesarean delivery technique: seeing the forest for the trees","volume":"136","author":"Dahlke JD","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Maggio L, Sperling JD, Chauhan SP, Rouse DJ. The case for standardizing cesarean delivery technique: seeing the forest for the trees. Obstet Gynecol. 2020, 136:972-80. 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004120","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/imm.13152","article-title":"Skin barrier immunity and ageing","volume":"160","author":"Chambers ES","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chambers ES, Vukmanovic-Stejic M. Skin barrier immunity and ageing. Immunology. 2020, 160:116-25. 10.1111\/imm.13152","journal-title":"Immunology"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(13)61780-8","article-title":"Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial","volume":"382","author":"Tsujinaka T","year":"2013","unstructured":"Tsujinaka T, Yamamoto K, Fujita J, et al.. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013, 382:1105-12. 10.1016\/S0140-6736(13)61780-8","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.22270\/JMPAS.V10I5.1380","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of subcuticular skin closure using MONOCRYL (poliglecaprone 25) versus ethilon (monofilament polyamide black)","volume":"10","author":"Maharaul HH","year":"2021","unstructured":"Maharaul HH, Shah B, Gandhi JP. Comparative evaluation of subcuticular skin closure using MONOCRYL (poliglecaprone 25) versus ethilon (monofilament polyamide black). J Med Pharm Allied Sci. 2021, 10:3682-5. 10.22270\/JMPAS.V10I5.1380","journal-title":"J Med Pharm Allied Sci"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD012124.pub2","article-title":"Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery","volume":"4","author":"Goto S","year":"2020","unstructured":"Goto S, Sakamoto T, Ganeko R, Hida K, Furukawa TA, Sakai Y. Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020, 4:CD012124. 10.1002\/14651858.CD012124.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.07.011","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery","volume":"203","author":"Basha SL","year":"2010","unstructured":"Basha SL, Rochon ML, Qui\u00f1ones JN, Coassolo KM, Rust OA, Smulian JC. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 203:285.e1-8. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.07.011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002200","article-title":"Comparison of subcuticular suture type for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"130","author":"Buresch AM","year":"2017","unstructured":"Buresch AM, Van Arsdale A, Ferzli M, et al.. Comparison of subcuticular suture type for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017, 130:521-6. 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002200","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.05.012","article-title":"Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin\u00a0closure at cesarean delivery","volume":"215","author":"Tuuli MG","year":"2016","unstructured":"Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, Martin S, Rampersad RM, Cahill AG, Macones GA. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin\u00a0closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016, 215:490.e1-5. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.05.012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1590\/s0102-865020180110000009","article-title":"Absorbable suture. best aesthetic outcome in cesarian scar","volume":"33","author":"Lima RJ","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lima RJ, Schnaider TB, Francisco AM, FrancescatoVeiga D. Absorbable suture. best aesthetic outcome in cesarian scar. Acta Cir Bras. 2018, 33:1027-36. 10.1590\/s0102-865020180110000009","journal-title":"Acta Cir Bras"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0b013e31827a072c","article-title":"Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"121","author":"Figueroa D","year":"2013","unstructured":"Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, et al.. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013, 121:33-8. 10.1097\/aog.0b013e31827a072c","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7860\/JCDR\/2018\/37034.11994","article-title":"Cesarean section: mortality and morbidity","volume":"12","author":"Gupta M","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gupta M, Saini V. Cesarean section: mortality and morbidity. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2018, 12:01-6. 10.7860\/JCDR\/2018\/37034.11994","journal-title":"J Clin Diagnostic Res"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-015-4209-x","article-title":"The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: running subcuticular closure enables the most robust perfusion after TKA: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"474","author":"Wyles CC","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wyles CC, Jacobson SR, Houdek MT, et al.. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: running subcuticular closure enables the most robust perfusion after TKA: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016, 474:47-56. 10.1007\/s11999-015-4209-x","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-013-0448-5","article-title":"Comparison of efficacy of three suture materials, i.e., poliglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910, polyamide, as subcuticular skin stitches in post-cesarean women: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"64","author":"Vats U","year":"2014","unstructured":"Vats U, Pandit Suchitra N. Comparison of efficacy of three suture materials, i.e., poliglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910, polyamide, as subcuticular skin stitches in post-cesarean women: a randomized clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014, 64:14-8. 10.1007\/s13224-013-0448-5","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol India"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5468\/ogs.2020.63.1.27","article-title":"Wound complication among different skin closure techniques in the emergency cesarean section: a randomized control trial","volume":"63","author":"Nayak G B","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nayak G B, Saha PK, Bagga R, Joshi B, Rohilla M, Gainder S, Sikka P. Wound complication among different skin closure techniques in the emergency cesarean section: a randomized control trial. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020, 63:27-34. 10.5468\/ogs.2020.63.1.27","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Sci"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-013037","article-title":"Incidence of surgical site infection following caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol","volume":"7","author":"Saeed KB","year":"2017","unstructured":"Saeed KB, Greene RA, Corcoran P, O'Neill SM. Incidence of surgical site infection following caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open. 2017, 7:e013037. 10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-013037","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2013.10.016","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial comparing subcuticular absorbable suture with conventional interrupted suture for wound closure at elective operation of colon cancer","volume":"155","author":"Tanaka A","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tanaka A, Sadahiro S, Suzuki T, Okada K, Saito G. Randomized controlled trial comparing subcuticular absorbable suture with conventional interrupted suture for wound closure at elective operation of colon cancer. Surgery. 2014, 155:486-92. 10.1016\/j.surg.2013.10.016","journal-title":"Surgery"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/155522-clinical-equivalence-of-monoglyde-and-monocryl-absorbable-poliglecaprone-25-sutures-a-single-blind-randomized-study","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,9]],"date-time":"2024-02-09T20:00:23Z","timestamp":1707508823000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/155522-clinical-equivalence-of-monoglyde-and-monocryl-absorbable-poliglecaprone-25-sutures-a-single-blind-randomized-study"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,12]]},"references-count":18,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.38938","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,12]]}}}