{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T08:33:47Z","timestamp":1774946027314,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,1]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.44521","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,1]],"date-time":"2023-09-01T12:28:03Z","timestamp":1693571283000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Intra-operative Guidelines for the Prevention of Uterine Niche Formation in Cesarean Sections: A Review"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Sean","family":"Backer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Deepesh","family":"Khanna","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sonia","family":"Sadr","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ali","family":"Khatibi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","article-title":"Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates","volume":"6","author":"Betran AP","year":"2021","unstructured":"Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021, 6:10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","journal-title":"BMJ Glob Health"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5603\/GP.a2021.0195","article-title":"Uterine niche after cesarean section: a review of diagnostic methods","volume":"92","author":"Budny-Winska J","year":"2021","unstructured":"Budny-Winska J, Pomorski M. Uterine niche after cesarean section: a review of diagnostic methods. Ginekol Pol. 2021, 92:726-30. 10.5603\/GP.a2021.0195","journal-title":"Ginekol Pol"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13199","article-title":"Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following cesarean section: systematic review","volume":"43","author":"Bij de Vaate AJ","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bij de Vaate AJ, van der Voet LF, Naji O, et al.. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014, 43:372-82. 10.1002\/uog.13199","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12542","article-title":"Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"121","author":"van der Voet LF","year":"2014","unstructured":"van der Voet LF, Bij de Vaate AM, Veersema S, Br\u00f6lmann HA, Huirne JA. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG. 2014, 121:236-44. 10.1111\/1471-0528.12542","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13918","article-title":"Reproductive outcome after cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"99","author":"Morlando M","year":"2020","unstructured":"Morlando M, Buca D, Timor-Tritsch I, et al.. Reproductive outcome after cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020, 99:1278-89. 10.1111\/aogs.13918","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1590\/1806-9282.65.5.714","article-title":"Isthmocele: an overview of diagnosis and treatment","volume":"65","author":"Kremer TG","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kremer TG, Ghiorzi IB, Dibi RP. Isthmocele: an overview of diagnosis and treatment. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019, 65:714-21. 10.1590\/1806-9282.65.5.714","journal-title":"Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev240","article-title":"Why do niches develop in caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development","volume":"30","author":"Vervoort AJ","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vervoort AJ, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJ, Br\u00f6lmann HA, Mol BW, Huirne JA. Why do niches develop in caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Hum Reprod. 2015, 30:2695-702. 10.1093\/humrep\/dev240","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.042","article-title":"Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next\u00a0pregnancy","volume":"217","author":"Vachon-Marceau C","year":"2017","unstructured":"Vachon-Marceau C, Demers S, Bujold E, et al.. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next\u00a0pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017, 217:65.e1-5. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.042","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7496","article-title":"Cesarean section scar defects: agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement","volume":"35","author":"Osser OV","year":"2010","unstructured":"Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. Cesarean section scar defects: agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 35:75-83. 10.1002\/uog.7496","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2021.102299","article-title":"Can uterine niche be prevented?","volume":"51","author":"de Luget CD","year":"2022","unstructured":"de Luget CD, Becchis E, Fernandez H, Donnez O, Quarello E. Can uterine niche be prevented?. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022, 51:102299. 10.1016\/j.jogoh.2021.102299","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1033","article-title":"Sonographic imaging of cervical scars after cesarean section","volume":"23","author":"Zimmer EZ","year":"2004","unstructured":"Zimmer EZ, Bardin R, Tamir A, Bronshtein M. Sonographic imaging of cervical scars after cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004, 23:594-8. 10.1002\/uog.1033","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02631.x","article-title":"Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section","volume":"117","author":"Vikhareva Osser O","year":"2010","unstructured":"Vikhareva Osser O, Valentin L. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section. BJOG. 2010, 117:1119-26. 10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02631.x","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4417-6","article-title":"Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after cesarean section","volume":"296","author":"Chen Y","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chen Y, Han P, Wang YJ, Li YX. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017, 296:355-61. 10.1007\/s00404-017-4417-6","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-7-24","article-title":"The CORONIS Trial. International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised fractional, factorial trial","volume":"7","year":"2007","unstructured":"The CORONIS Trial. International study of caesarean section surgical techniques. a randomised fractional, factorial trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007, 7:24. 10.1186\/1471-2393-7-24","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02686.x","article-title":"Caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised factorial trial (CAESAR)","volume":"117","year":"2010","unstructured":"Caesarean section surgical techniques. a randomised factorial trial (CAESAR). BJOG. 2010, 117:1366-76. 10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02686.x","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17401","article-title":"Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"50","author":"Di Spiezio Sardo A","year":"2017","unstructured":"Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saccone G, McCurdy R, Bujold E, Bifulco G, Berghella V. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017, 50:578-83. 10.1002\/uog.17401","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15048","article-title":"Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"125","author":"Stegwee SI","year":"2018","unstructured":"Stegwee SI, Jordans I, van der Voet LF, et al.. Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2018, 125:1097-108. 10.1111\/1471-0528.15048","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.18405","article-title":"Single- versus double-layer uterine closure after cesarean section delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"13","author":"Qayum K","year":"2021","unstructured":"Qayum K, Kar I, Sofi J, Panneerselvam H. Single- versus double-layer uterine closure after cesarean section delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2021, 13:e18405. 10.7759\/cureus.18405","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.01.009","article-title":"Uterine scar rupture: prediction, prevention, diagnosis, and management","volume":"59","author":"Tanos V","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tanos V, Toney ZA. Uterine scar rupture: prediction, prevention, diagnosis, and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019, 59:115-31. 10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.01.009","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4702-z","article-title":"Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study","volume":"297","author":"Tekiner NB","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tekiner NB, \u00c7etin BA, T\u00fcrkgeldi LS, Y\u0131lmaz G, Polat \u0130, Gedikba\u015f\u0131 A. Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018, 297:1137-43. 10.1007\/s00404-018-4702-z","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16472","article-title":"Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial","volume":"128","author":"Stegwee SI","year":"2021","unstructured":"Stegwee SI, van der Voet LF, Ben AJ, et al.. Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial. BJOG. 2021, 128:866-78. 10.1111\/1471-0528.16472","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13213","article-title":"Longitudinal transvaginal ultrasound evaluation of cesarean scar niche incidence and depth in the first two years after single- or double-layer uterotomy closure: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"96","author":"Bamberg C","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bamberg C, Hinkson L, Dudenhausen JW, Bujak V, Kalache KD, Henrich W. Longitudinal transvaginal ultrasound evaluation of cesarean scar niche incidence and depth in the first two years after single- or double-layer uterotomy closure: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017, 96:1484-9. 10.1111\/aogs.13213","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14018","article-title":"Single- or double-layer uterine closure techniques following cesarean: a randomized trial","volume":"100","author":"Y\u0131lmaz Baran \u015e","year":"2021","unstructured":"Y\u0131lmaz Baran \u015e, Kalayc\u0131 H, Do\u011fan Durda\u011f G, Yetkinel S, Alemdaro\u011flu S, \u00c7ok T, Bulgan K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7da\u011f E. Single- or double-layer uterine closure techniques following cesarean: a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021, 100:531-7. 10.1111\/aogs.14018","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.11.013","article-title":"Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery","volume":"125","author":"Sevket O","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sevket O, Ates S, Molla T, Ozkal F, Uysal O, Dansuk R. Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014, 125:219-22. 10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.11.013","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916","article-title":"Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"214","author":"Roberge S","year":"2016","unstructured":"Roberge S, Demers S, Girard M, et al.. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016, 214:507.e1-6. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13714","article-title":"Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one\u00a0year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure","volume":"99","author":"Hanacek J","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hanacek J, Vojtech J, Urbankova I, Krcmar M, K\u0159epelka P, Feyereisl J, Krofta L. Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one\u00a0year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020, 99:69-78. 10.1111\/aogs.13714","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.14740\/jocmr3271w","article-title":"Etiology of cesarean uterine scar defect (niche): detailed critical analysis of hypotheses and prevention strategies and peritoneal closure debate","volume":"10","author":"Sholapurkar SL","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sholapurkar SL. Etiology of cesarean uterine scar defect (niche): detailed critical analysis of hypotheses and prevention strategies and peritoneal closure debate. J Clin Med Res. 2018, 10:166-73. 10.14740\/jocmr3271w","journal-title":"J Clin Med Res"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13015","article-title":"Comparison of the primary cesarean hysterotomy scars after single- and double-layer interrupted closure","volume":"95","author":"Kataoka S","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kataoka S, Tanuma F, Iwaki Y, Iwaki K, Fujii T, Fujimoto T. Comparison of the primary cesarean hysterotomy scars after single- and double-layer interrupted closure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016, 95:1352-8. 10.1111\/aogs.13015","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.14889","article-title":"Babu and Magon uterine closure technique during cesarean section: a randomized double-blind trial","volume":"47","author":"Tahermanesh K","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tahermanesh K, Mirgalobayat S, Aziz-Ahari A, et al.. Babu and Magon uterine closure technique during cesarean section: a randomized double-blind trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021, 47:3186-95. 10.1111\/jog.14889","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/08941939.2019.1610530","article-title":"An optimal uterine closure technique for better scar healing and avoiding isthmocele in cesarean section: a randomized controlled study","volume":"34","author":"Kalem Z","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kalem Z, Kaya AE, Bak\u0131rarar B, Basbug A, Kalem MN. An optimal uterine closure technique for better scar healing and avoiding isthmocele in cesarean section: a randomized controlled study. J Invest Surg. 2021, 34:148-56. 10.1080\/08941939.2019.1610530","journal-title":"J Invest Surg"},{"key":"ref31","unstructured":"NICE. 2021 exceptional surveillance of caesarean birth: surgical opening technique (NICE guideline NG192). (2021). Accessed: September 7, 2022: http:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng192\/resources\/2021-exceptional-surveillance-of-caesarean-birth-surgical-opening-tec...."},{"key":"ref32","article-title":"NICE: Surveillance Report 2017: Caesarean Section (2011) NICE Guideline","year":"2017","unstructured":"NICE. Surveillance Report 2017: Caesarean Section (2011) NICE Guideline. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London; 2017."},{"key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2021.1966763","article-title":"Risk of uterine niche following single-layer locked versus unlocked uterine closure: a randomized study","volume":"35","author":"Bayraktar R","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bayraktar R, Mulayim B, Tamburaci E, Karadag C, Karadag B. Risk of uterine niche following single-layer locked versus unlocked uterine closure: a randomized study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022, 35:8210-6. 10.1080\/14767058.2021.1966763","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.06.003","article-title":"To close or not to close? A systematic review and a meta-analysis of peritoneal non-closure and adhesion formation after caesarean section","volume":"147","author":"Cheong YC","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cheong YC, Premkumar G, Metwally M, Peacock JL, Li TC. To close or not to close? A systematic review and a meta-analysis of peritoneal non-closure and adhesion formation after caesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009, 147:3-8. 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.06.003","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.012","article-title":"Effectiveness and short-term safety of modified sodium hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose at cesarean delivery: a randomized trial","volume":"214","author":"Kiefer DG","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kiefer DG, Muscat JC, Santorelli J, Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. Effectiveness and short-term safety of modified sodium hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose at cesarean delivery: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016, 214:373.e1-12. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5812\/ircmj.34449","article-title":"Application of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on wound healing after caesarean section in high-risk patients","volume":"18","author":"Tehranian A","year":"2016","unstructured":"Tehranian A, Esfehani-Mehr B, Pirjani R, Rezaei N, Sadat Heidary S, Sepidarkish M. Application of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on wound healing after caesarean section in high-risk patients. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016, 18:e34449. 10.5812\/ircmj.34449","journal-title":"Iran Red Crescent Med J"},{"key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000517117","article-title":"Does autologous platelet-rich plasma improve wound healing and pain perception after cesarean section in high-risk patients?","volume":"86","author":"Elkhouly NI","year":"2021","unstructured":"Elkhouly NI, Elkilani OA, Kolaib HA, Elkhouly RM, Morsi DI. Does autologous platelet-rich plasma improve wound healing and pain perception after cesarean section in high-risk patients?. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2021, 86:336-42. 10.1159\/000517117","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-018-1130-8","article-title":"In vitro evidence that platelet-rich plasma stimulates cellular processes involved in endometrial regeneration","volume":"35","author":"Aghajanova L","year":"2018","unstructured":"Aghajanova L, Houshdaran S, Balayan S, Manvelyan E, Irwin JC, Huddleston HG, Giudice LC. In vitro evidence that platelet-rich plasma stimulates cellular processes involved in endometrial regeneration. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018, 35:757-70. 10.1007\/s10815-018-1130-8","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"ref39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fphys.2020.00105","article-title":"Intrauterine infusion of human platelet-rich plasma improves endometrial regeneration and pregnancy outcomes in a murine model of Asherman's syndrome","volume":"11","author":"Kim JH","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kim JH, Park M, Paek JY, Lee WS, Song H, Lyu SW. Intrauterine infusion of human platelet-rich plasma improves endometrial regeneration and pregnancy outcomes in a murine model of Asherman's syndrome. Front Physiol. 2020, 11:105. 10.3389\/fphys.2020.00105","journal-title":"Front Physiol"},{"key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.14526","article-title":"Identify the role of Human Wharton's Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cells in repairing injured uterine of rat","volume":"47","author":"Wang H","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wang H, Yang X, Chen X, Xie H, Wang J, Zhang Y. Identify the role of Human Wharton's Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cells in repairing injured uterine of rat. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021, 47:320-8. 10.1111\/jog.14526","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"ref41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5812\/semj.114072","article-title":"Effect of autologous platelet-rich plasma on cesarean section scar; a randomized, double-blinded pilot study","volume":"23","author":"Chaichian S","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chaichian S, Mirgaloybayat S, Tahermanesh K, et al.. Effect of autologous platelet-rich plasma on cesarean section scar; a randomized, double-blinded pilot study. Shiraz E-Med J. 2022, 23:114072. 10.5812\/semj.114072","journal-title":"Shiraz E-Med J"},{"key":"ref42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000008480","article-title":"Umbilical cord mesenchyme stem cell local intramuscular injection for treatment of uterine niche: protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial","volume":"96","author":"Fan D","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fan D, Wu S, Ye S, Wang W, Guo X, Liu Z. Umbilical cord mesenchyme stem cell local intramuscular injection for treatment of uterine niche: protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017, 96:e8480. 10.1097\/MD.0000000000008480","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"ref43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.15283\/ijsc20049","article-title":"miR-29a in exosomes from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibit fibrosis during endometrial repair of intrauterine adhesion","volume":"13","author":"Tan Q","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tan Q, Xia D, Ying X. miR-29a in exosomes from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibit fibrosis during endometrial repair of intrauterine adhesion. Int J Stem Cells. 2020, 13:414-23. 10.15283\/ijsc20049","journal-title":"Int J Stem Cells"},{"key":"ref44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13287-022-02756-9","article-title":"Intrauterine infusion of clinically graded human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of poor healing after uterine injury: a phase I clinical trial","volume":"13","author":"Huang J","year":"2022","unstructured":"Huang J, Li Q, Yuan X, Liu Q, Zhang W, Li P. Intrauterine infusion of clinically graded human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of poor healing after uterine injury: a phase I clinical trial. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022, 13:85. 10.1186\/s13287-022-02756-9","journal-title":"Stem Cell Res Ther"},{"key":"ref45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2021.1951213","article-title":"The potential of extracellular microvesicles of mesenchymal stromal cells in obstetrics","volume":"35","author":"Pekarev OG","year":"2022","unstructured":"Pekarev OG, Pekareva EO, Mayborodin IV, et al.. The potential of extracellular microvesicles of mesenchymal stromal cells in obstetrics. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022, 35:7523-5. 10.1080\/14767058.2021.1951213","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"ref46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10735-013-9485-8","article-title":"The effect of lipoic acid on wound healing in a full thickness uterine injury model in rats","volume":"44","author":"Micili SC","year":"2013","unstructured":"Micili SC, Goker A, Sayin O, Akokay P, Ergur BU. The effect of lipoic acid on wound healing in a full thickness uterine injury model in rats. J Mol Histol. 2013, 44:339-45. 10.1007\/s10735-013-9485-8","journal-title":"J Mol Histol"},{"key":"ref47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-5011-2","article-title":"The effect of alpha lipoic acid on uterine wound healing after primary cesarean section: a triple-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group randomized clinical trial","volume":"299","author":"Sammour H","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sammour H, Elkholy A, Rasheedy R, Fadel E. The effect of alpha lipoic acid on uterine wound healing after primary cesarean section: a triple-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019, 299:665-73. 10.1007\/s00404-018-5011-2","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/175006-intra-operative-guidelines-for-the-prevention-of-uterine-niche-formation-in-cesarean-sections-a-review","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,9]],"date-time":"2024-02-09T19:58:35Z","timestamp":1707508715000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/175006-intra-operative-guidelines-for-the-prevention-of-uterine-niche-formation-in-cesarean-sections-a-review"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,1]]},"references-count":47,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.44521","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,1]]}}}