{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,4]],"date-time":"2026-09-04T06:02:36Z","timestamp":1788501756527,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,6]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.44772","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,6]],"date-time":"2023-09-06T12:37:30Z","timestamp":1694003850000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Comparison of Intracervical Foley\u2019s Catheter With Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Nivedita A","family":"Kadu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shobha","family":"Shiragur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","article-title":"Induction of labour and cervical ripening","year":"2018","unstructured":"Induction of labour and cervical ripening. Williams Obstetrics, 25th Edition. Cunningham F, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM, Spong CY (ed). McGraw-Hill Education, Australia; 2018."},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349.2010.499447","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction","volume":"89","author":"Moraes Filho OB","year":"2010","unstructured":"Moraes Filho OB, Albuquerque RM, Cecatti JG. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010, 89:1045-52. 10.3109\/00016349.2010.499447","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref3","article-title":"WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. WHO Recommendations: Induction of Labor at or beyond Term. World Health Organization","year":"2022","unstructured":"Who Recommendations on Induction of Labour, at or Beyond Term. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; 2022. https.\/\/www.who.int\/publications\/i\/item\/9789240052796."},{"key":"ref4","article-title":"Concurrent use of intracervical foleys catheter plus vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone for induction of labour","volume":"8","author":"Gilani S","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gilani S, Hanif M, Mazhar SB, Saeed N. Concurrent use of intracervical foleys catheter plus vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone for induction of labour. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Pak. 2018, 8:189-93.","journal-title":"J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Pak"},{"key":"ref5","article-title":"Profiling cervical ripening for induction of labour with Foley\u2019s balloon catheter in Ebonyi state, Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"10","author":"Adiele NA","year":"2022","unstructured":"Adiele NA, Mgbafulu CC, Ikeotuonye AC, et al.. Profiling cervical ripening for induction of labour with Foley\u2019s balloon catheter in Ebonyi state, Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Res Med Sci. 2022, 10:22.","journal-title":"Int J Res Med Sci"},{"key":"ref6","article-title":"Comparison between intracervical Foley catheter plus misoprostol and misoprostol alone for labor induction","volume":"32","author":"El-Kelani OA","year":"2019","unstructured":"El-Kelani OA, El-Halaby AE, El-Shamy ES, Abd El-Fattah TN. Comparison between intracervical Foley catheter plus misoprostol and misoprostol alone for labor induction. Menoufia Med J. 2019, 32:1393-6.","journal-title":"Menoufia Med J"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman WA","year":"2018","unstructured":"Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, et al.. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018, 379:513-23. 10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.06.017","article-title":"Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature","volume":"170","author":"Jozwiak M","year":"2013","unstructured":"Jozwiak M, Oude Rengerink K, Ten Eikelder ML, et al.. Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013, 170:137-45. 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.06.017","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006901.pub3","article-title":"Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour","volume":"12","author":"Ghosh A","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ghosh A, Lattey KR, Kelly AJ. Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016, 12:CD006901. 10.1002\/14651858.CD006901.pub3","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.001","article-title":"Overview of the mechanisms of induction of labor","volume":"39","author":"Irani RA","year":"2015","unstructured":"Irani RA, Foster S. Overview of the mechanisms of induction of labor. Semin Perinatol. 2015, 39:426-9. 10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.001","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15285","article-title":"Foley catheter vs. oral misoprostol to induce labour among hypertensive women in India: a cost-consequence analysis alongside a clinical trial","volume":"125","author":"Leigh S","year":"2018","unstructured":"Leigh S, Granby P, Haycox A, et al.. Foley catheter vs. oral misoprostol to induce labour among hypertensive women in India: a cost-consequence analysis alongside a clinical trial. BJOG. 2018, 125:1734-42. 10.1111\/1471-0528.15285","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002403","article-title":"Misoprostol with foley bulb compared with misoprostol alone for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"131","author":"Al-Ibraheemi Z","year":"2018","unstructured":"Al-Ibraheemi Z, Brustman L, Bimson BE, Porat N, Rosenn B. Misoprostol with foley bulb compared with misoprostol alone for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018, 131:23-9. 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002403","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.02065.x","article-title":"Indications for induction of labour: a best-evidence review","volume":"116","author":"Mozurkewich E","year":"2009","unstructured":"Mozurkewich E, Chilimigras J, Koepke E, Keeton K, King VJ. Indications for induction of labour: a best-evidence review. BJOG. 2009, 116:626-36. 10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.02065.x","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4998-8","article-title":"Transcervical Foley balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert combination vs. vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert only for induction of labor at term: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"299","author":"Eser A","year":"2019","unstructured":"Eser A, Ozkaya E, Abide CY, et al.. Transcervical Foley balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert combination vs. vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert only for induction of labor at term: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019, 299:451-7. 10.1007\/s00404-018-4998-8","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102484","article-title":"Pain and satisfaction in women induced by vaginal dinoprostone, double balloon catheter and oral misoprostol","volume":"51","author":"Druenne J","year":"2022","unstructured":"Druenne J, Semay T, Giraud A, Chauleur C, Raia-Barjat T. Pain and satisfaction in women induced by vaginal dinoprostone, double balloon catheter and oral misoprostol. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022, 51:102484. 10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102484","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/177890-comparison-of-intracervical-foleys-catheter-with-vaginal-misoprostol-versus-intravaginal-misoprostol-alone-for-cervical-ripening-and-induction-of-labor","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,9]],"date-time":"2024-02-09T20:04:43Z","timestamp":1707509083000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/177890-comparison-of-intracervical-foleys-catheter-with-vaginal-misoprostol-versus-intravaginal-misoprostol-alone-for-cervical-ripening-and-induction-of-labor"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,6]]},"references-count":15,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.44772","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,6]]}}}