{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]],"date-time":"2026-06-29T22:14:07Z","timestamp":1782771247710,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,19]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.47356","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,20]],"date-time":"2023-10-20T07:00:06Z","timestamp":1697785206000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Dislocation of the PreserFlo MicroShunt During a Postsurgical Needling Procedure"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Kana","family":"Murakami","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mizuki","family":"Iida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ayaka","family":"Shimada","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sho","family":"Ichioka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Akiko","family":"Harano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aika","family":"Tsutsui","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Masaki","family":"Tanito","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/rb\/rbw005","article-title":"The use of poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) as a microshunt to treat glaucoma","volume":"3","author":"Pinchuk L","year":"2016","unstructured":"Pinchuk L, Riss I, Batlle JF, et al.. The use of poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) as a microshunt to treat glaucoma. Regen Biomater. 2016, 3:137-42. 10.1093\/rb\/rbw005","journal-title":"Regen Biomater"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2021.05.023","article-title":"Ab-externo Microshunt versus Trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma: one-year results from a 2-year randomized, multicenter study","volume":"128","author":"Baker ND","year":"2021","unstructured":"Baker ND, Barnebey HS, Moster MR, et al.. Ab-externo Microshunt versus Trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma: one-year results from a 2-year randomized, multicenter study. Ophthalmology. 2021, 128:1710-21. 10.1016\/j.ophtha.2021.05.023","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-023-06075-4","article-title":"PRESERFLO \u2122 MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: 1-year results on efficacy and safety","volume":"261","author":"Jamke M","year":"2023","unstructured":"Jamke M, Herber R, Haase MA, Jasper CS, Pillunat LE, Pillunat KR. PRESERFLO \u2122 MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: 1-year results on efficacy and safety. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023, 261:2901-15. 10.1007\/s00417-023-06075-4","journal-title":"Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogla.2022.11.006","article-title":"Clinical outcomes and cost analysis of PreserFlo versus trabeculectomy for glaucoma management in the United Kingdom","volume":"6","author":"Van Lancker L","year":"2023","unstructured":"Van Lancker L, Saravanan A, Abu-Bakra M, et al.. Clinical outcomes and cost analysis of PreserFlo versus trabeculectomy for glaucoma management in the United Kingdom. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2023, 6:342-57. 10.1016\/j.ogla.2022.11.006","journal-title":"Ophthalmol Glaucoma"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000002052","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of the PreserFlo MicroShunt with mitomycin C for the treatment of open angle glaucoma","volume":"31","author":"Ibarz Barber\u00e1 M","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ibarz Barber\u00e1 M, Mart\u00ednez-Gald\u00f3n F, Caballero-Magro E, Rodr\u00edguez-Pi\u00f1ero M, Ta\u00f1\u00e1-Rivero P. Efficacy and safety of the PreserFlo MicroShunt with mitomycin C for the treatment of open angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2022, 31:557-66. 10.1097\/IJG.0000000000002052","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2021-320631","article-title":"One-year surgical outcomes of the PreserFlo MicroShunt in glaucoma: a multicentre analysis","volume":"107","author":"Tanner A","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tanner A, Haddad F, Fajardo-Sanchez J, et al.. One-year surgical outcomes of the PreserFlo MicroShunt in glaucoma: a multicentre analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2023, 107:1104-11. 10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2021-320631","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000002091","article-title":"Blood reflux through a PreserFlo MicroShunt device after needling","volume":"31","author":"Cassottana P","year":"2022","unstructured":"Cassottana P, Di Mola I, Ferro Desideri L, Vagge A, Cutolo CA, Traverso CE, Iester M. Blood reflux through a PreserFlo MicroShunt device after needling. J Glaucoma. 2022, 31:979-81. 10.1097\/IJG.0000000000002091","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajoc.2022.101347","article-title":"Conjunctival erosion following a PRESERFLO\u00ae MicroShunt procedure","volume":"25","author":"Fahy ET","year":"2022","unstructured":"Fahy ET, Ho H, Dukht U, Garg A, Lim KS. Conjunctival erosion following a PRESERFLO\u00ae MicroShunt procedure. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2022, 25:101347. 10.1016\/j.ajoc.2022.101347","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/11206721211019548","article-title":"A case of endophthalmitis following needling procedure after PRESERFLO(\u00ae) MicroShunt implantation","volume":"32","author":"Brambati M","year":"2022","unstructured":"Brambati M, Bettin P, Ramoni A, Battista M, Bandello F. A case of endophthalmitis following needling procedure after PRESERFLO(\u00ae) MicroShunt implantation. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022, 32:NP83-6. 10.1177\/11206721211019548","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/11206721221093828","article-title":"Reintervention rate in glaucoma filtering surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"32","author":"Marolo P","year":"2022","unstructured":"Marolo P, Reibaldi M, Fallico M, et al.. Reintervention rate in glaucoma filtering surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022, 32:2515-31. 10.1177\/11206721221093828","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/194478-dislocation-of-the-preserflo-microshunt-during-a-postsurgical-needling-procedure","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,9]],"date-time":"2024-02-09T20:06:44Z","timestamp":1707509204000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/194478-dislocation-of-the-preserflo-microshunt-during-a-postsurgical-needling-procedure"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,19]]},"references-count":10,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.47356","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,19]]}}}