{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,10]],"date-time":"2024-02-10T00:22:10Z","timestamp":1707524530402},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,28]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.47868","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,28]],"date-time":"2023-10-28T15:42:01Z","timestamp":1698507721000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Multiple Adverse Outcomes of Intrauterine Devices in One Patient: A Case Report"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Ariel","family":"Hall","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Reetu","family":"Grewal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","article-title":"Intrauterine device","author":"Lanzola EL","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lanzola EL, Ketvertis K. Intrauterine device. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL); 2023."},{"key":"ref2","article-title":"A review of long-acting reversible contraception methods and barriers to their use","volume":"117","author":"Baron M","year":"2018","unstructured":"Baron M, Potter B, Schrager S. A review of long-acting reversible contraception methods and barriers to their use. WMJ. 2018, 117:156-9.","journal-title":"WMJ"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.006","article-title":"The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: a systematic review","volume":"95","author":"Jatlaoui TC","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jatlaoui TC, Riley HE, Curtis KM. The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: a systematic review. Contraception. 2017, 95:17-39. 10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.006","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"ref4","unstructured":"Birth control. (2023). Accessed. September 20, 2023: https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/consumers\/free-publications-women\/birth-control."},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.06.011","article-title":"Rates of pregnancy among levonorgestrel and copper intrauterine emergency contraception initiators: implications for backup contraception recommendations","volume":"104","author":"Fay KE","year":"2021","unstructured":"Fay KE, Clement AC, Gero A, Kaiser JE, Sanders JN, BakenRa AA, Turok DK. Rates of pregnancy among levonorgestrel and copper intrauterine emergency contraception initiators: implications for backup contraception recommendations. Contraception. 2021, 104:561-6. 10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.06.011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/9362962","article-title":"Retained intrauterine device (iud): triple case report and review of the literature","volume":"2018","author":"Cheung ML","year":"2018","unstructured":"Cheung ML, Rezai S, Jackman JM, et al.. Retained intrauterine device (iud): triple case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018, 2018:10.1155\/2018\/9362962","journal-title":"Case Rep Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.32537","article-title":"Retained copper intrauterine device fragment in pregnancy: a case report","volume":"14","author":"Chin J","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chin J, Lomiguen CM, Hernandez H, Kane A. Retained copper intrauterine device fragment in pregnancy: a case report. Cureus. 2022, 14:e32537. 10.7759\/cureus.32537","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crwh.2020.e00208","article-title":"Retained copper fragments following removal of a copper intrauterine device: two case reports","volume":"27","author":"Dubovis M","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dubovis M, Rizk N. Retained copper fragments following removal of a copper intrauterine device: two case reports. Case Rep Womens Health. 2020, 27:e00208. 10.1016\/j.crwh.2020.e00208","journal-title":"Case Rep Womens Health"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(96)00135-7","article-title":"The missing forgotten intrauterine contraceptive device","volume":"54","author":"Gruber A","year":"1996","unstructured":"Gruber A, Rabinerson D, Kaplan B, Pardo J, Neri A. The missing forgotten intrauterine contraceptive device. Contraception. 1996, 54:117-9. 10.1016\/0010-7824(96)00135-7","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crwh.2021.e00287","article-title":"Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: a case report","volume":"29","author":"Sarver J","year":"2021","unstructured":"Sarver J, Cregan M, Cain D. Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: a case report. Case Rep Womens Health. 2021, 29:e00287. 10.1016\/j.crwh.2021.e00287","journal-title":"Case Rep Womens Health"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radcr.2020.07.005","article-title":"Spontaneously expelled IUD and missing fragments in the uterine cavity","volume":"15","author":"Wakrim S","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wakrim S, Lahlou L. Spontaneously expelled IUD and missing fragments in the uterine cavity. Radiol Case Rep. 2020, 15:1654-6. 10.1016\/j.radcr.2020.07.005","journal-title":"Radiol Case Rep"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1752-1947-8-81","article-title":"Sigmoid colocolic fistula caused by intrauterine device migration: a case report","volume":"8","author":"Weerasekera A","year":"2014","unstructured":"Weerasekera A, Wijesinghe P, Nugaduwa N. Sigmoid colocolic fistula caused by intrauterine device migration: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014, 8:81. 10.1186\/1752-1947-8-81","journal-title":"J Med Case Rep"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-022-01246-0","article-title":"In-office hysteroscopic removal of retained or fragmented intrauterine device without anesthesia: a cross-sectional analysis of an international survey","volume":"74","author":"Vitale SG","year":"2022","unstructured":"Vitale SG, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Riemma G, De Franciscis P, Alonso Pacheco L, Carugno J. In-office hysteroscopic removal of retained or fragmented intrauterine device without anesthesia: a cross-sectional analysis of an international survey. Updates Surg. 2022, 74:1079-85. 10.1007\/s13304-022-01246-0","journal-title":"Updates Surg"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/194333-multiple-adverse-outcomes-of-intrauterine-devices-in-one-patient-a-case-report","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,9]],"date-time":"2024-02-09T19:51:57Z","timestamp":1707508317000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/194333-multiple-adverse-outcomes-of-intrauterine-devices-in-one-patient-a-case-report"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,28]]},"references-count":13,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.47868","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,28]]}}}