{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,27]],"date-time":"2026-09-27T17:32:33Z","timestamp":1790530353359,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,7]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.50113","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,7]],"date-time":"2023-12-07T14:39:28Z","timestamp":1701959968000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Does the Number of Interbody Devices Affect the Fusion Outcome in Short-Segment Posterior Lumbar Fusion?"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Mara","family":"Atherton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aleeza","family":"Safdar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rouzbeh","family":"Motiei-Langroudi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199701150-00016","article-title":"Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis","volume":"22","author":"Suk SI","year":"1997","unstructured":"Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, Lee JH, Cho KJ, Kim HG. Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997, 22:210-9; discussion 219-20. 10.1097\/00007632-199701150-00016","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0300060520910025","article-title":"Augmenting posterolateral fusion with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage improves clinical outcome, but not fusion rate, of posterior decompression","volume":"48","author":"Atici T","year":"2020","unstructured":"Atici T, Yerebakan S, Ermutlu C, \u00d6zyal\u00e7\u0131n A. Augmenting posterolateral fusion with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage improves clinical outcome, but not fusion rate, of posterior decompression. J Int Med Res. 2020, 48:300060520910025. 10.1177\/0300060520910025","journal-title":"J Int Med Res"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2016.08.017","article-title":"Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion In degenerative spondylolisthesis: an attempt to evaluate the superiority of one method over the other","volume":"150","author":"Ghasemi AA","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ghasemi AA. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion In degenerative spondylolisthesis: an attempt to evaluate the superiority of one method over the other. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016, 150:1-5. 10.1016\/j.clineuro.2016.08.017","journal-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2015.08.014","article-title":"Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone","volume":"138","author":"Macki M","year":"2015","unstructured":"Macki M, Bydon M, Weingart R, et al.. Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015, 138:117-23. 10.1016\/j.clineuro.2015.08.014","journal-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003615","article-title":"Single-level posterolateral fusion (PLF) alone and posterior interbody fusion (PLIF\/TLIF) alone lead to a decreased risk of short-term complications compared to combined PLF with PLIF\/TLIF procedures: a matched analysis","volume":"45","author":"Plantz MA","year":"2020","unstructured":"Plantz MA, Hsu WK. Single-level posterolateral fusion (PLF) alone and posterior interbody fusion (PLIF\/TLIF) alone lead to a decreased risk of short-term complications compared to combined PLF with PLIF\/TLIF procedures: a matched analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020, 45:E1391-9. 10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003615","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000218635.14571.55","article-title":"Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine","volume":"31","author":"Kim KT","year":"2006","unstructured":"Kim KT, Lee SH, Lee YH, Bae SC, Suk KS. Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006, 31:1351-7; discussion 1358. 10.1097\/01.brs.0000218635.14571.55","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000549","article-title":"What is the optimum fusion technique for adult spondylolisthesis-PLIF or PLF or PLIF plus PLF? A meta-analysis from 17 comparative studies","volume":"39","author":"Liu XY","year":"2014","unstructured":"Liu XY, Qiu GX, Weng XS, Yu B, Wang YP. What is the optimum fusion technique for adult spondylolisthesis-PLIF or PLF or PLIF plus PLF? A meta-analysis from 17 comparative studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014, 39:1887-98. 10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000549","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"ref8","article-title":"Clinical outcomes of posterolateral fusion vs. posterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative instability","volume":"21","author":"Farrokhi MR","year":"2018","unstructured":"Farrokhi MR, Yadollahikhales G, Gholami M, Mousavi SR, Mesbahi AR, Asadi-Pooya AA. Clinical outcomes of posterolateral fusion vs. posterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative instability. Pain Physician. 2018, 21:383-406.","journal-title":"Pain Physician"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.11.109","article-title":"One-level or multilevel interbody fusion for multilevel lumbar degenerative diseases: a prospective randomized control study with a 4-year follow-up","volume":"110","author":"Li T","year":"2018","unstructured":"Li T, Shi L, Luo Y, Chen D, Chen Y. One-level or multilevel interbody fusion for multilevel lumbar degenerative diseases: a prospective randomized control study with a 4-year follow-up. World Neurosurg. 2018, 110:e815-22. 10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.11.109","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001857","article-title":"One-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and posterior approach: is transforaminal lateral interbody fusion mandatory? A randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up","volume":"42","author":"Challier V","year":"2017","unstructured":"Challier V, Boissiere L, Obeid I, et al.. One-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and posterior approach: is transforaminal lateral interbody fusion mandatory? A randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017, 42:531-9. 10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001857","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.01.028","article-title":"Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"18","author":"Levin JM","year":"2018","unstructured":"Levin JM, Tanenbaum JE, Steinmetz MP, Mroz TE, Overley SC. Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2018, 18:1088-98. 10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.01.028","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12306-019-00634-x","article-title":"Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review","volume":"104","author":"Formica M","year":"2020","unstructured":"Formica M, Vallerga D, Zanirato A, et al.. Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg. 2020, 104:1-15. 10.1007\/s12306-019-00634-x","journal-title":"Musculoskelet Surg"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.09.019","article-title":"Risk factors for cage retropulsion after lumbar interbody fusion: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"132","author":"Liu K","year":"2019","unstructured":"Liu K, Chang H, Wang L, Wang C, Chen T, Meng X. Risk factors for cage retropulsion after lumbar interbody fusion: systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2019, 132:273-81. 10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.09.019","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/204550-does-the-number-of-interbody-devices-affect-the-fusion-outcome-in-short-segment-posterior-lumbar-fusion","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,9]],"date-time":"2024-02-09T20:08:25Z","timestamp":1707509305000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/204550-does-the-number-of-interbody-devices-affect-the-fusion-outcome-in-short-segment-posterior-lumbar-fusion"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,7]]},"references-count":13,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.50113","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,7]]}}}