{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,2]],"date-time":"2026-07-02T13:14:58Z","timestamp":1782998098126,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,23]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.54740","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,23]],"date-time":"2024-02-23T09:15:31Z","timestamp":1708679731000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["An In Vivo Study to Compare the Clinical Effectiveness of Clear Retainer Made on a Conventional and a Digitally Fabricated Model Over a Six-Month Period After Debonding"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Perthish","family":"Sharma","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sukhdeep Singh","family":"Kahlon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chetan Dev Singh","family":"Boparai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","article-title":"The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models","volume":"74","author":"Quimby ML","year":"2004","unstructured":"Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod. 2004, 74:298-303.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2014.01.025","article-title":"Virtual techniques for designing and fabricating a retainer","volume":"146","author":"Nasef AA","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nasef AA, El-Beialy AR, Mostafa YA. Virtual techniques for designing and fabricating a retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014, 146:394-8.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2018.09.011","article-title":"Evaluation of fit for 3D-printed retainers compared with thermoform retainers","volume":"155","author":"Cole D","year":"2019","unstructured":"Cole D, Bencharit S, Carrico CK, Arias A, T\u00fcfek\u00e7i E. Evaluation of fit for 3D-printed retainers compared with thermoform retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019, 155:592-9.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2017.10.025","article-title":"Periodontal health and compliance: a comparison between Essix and Hawley retainers","volume":"153","author":"Manzon L","year":"2018","unstructured":"Manzon L, Fratto G, Rossi E, Buccheri A. Periodontal health and compliance: a comparison between Essix and Hawley retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018, 153:852-60.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1072-348X(19)80039-6","article-title":"A removable retainer","volume":"1","author":"Hawley CA","year":"1919","unstructured":"Hawley CA. A removable retainer. Int J Orthod Oral Surg. 1919, 1:291-305. 10.1016\/S1072-348X(19)80039-6","journal-title":"Int J Orthod Oral Surg"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9416(71)90099-6","article-title":"Invisible retainers","volume":"59","author":"Ponitz RJ","year":"1971","unstructured":"Ponitz RJ. Invisible retainers. Am J Orthod. 1971, 59:266-72. 10.1016\/0002-9416(71)90099-6","journal-title":"Am J Orthod"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2016.03.020","article-title":"Effectiveness of bonded and vacuum-formed retainers: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial","volume":"150","author":"O'Rourke N","year":"2016","unstructured":"O'Rourke N, Albeedh H, Sharma P, Johal A. Effectiveness of bonded and vacuum-formed retainers: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016, 150:406-15. 10.1016\/j.ajodo.2016.03.020","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjm039","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction: Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers","volume":"29","author":"Hichens L","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hichens L, Rowland H, Williams A, et al.. Cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction: Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers. Eur J Orthod. 2007, 29:372-8. 10.1093\/ejo\/cjm039","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2013.05.011","article-title":"Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques","volume":"145","author":"Hazeveld A","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hazeveld A, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014, 145:108-15. 10.1016\/j.ajodo.2013.05.011","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10006-013-0404-7","article-title":"Validity of the 3D VECTRA photogrammetric surface imaging system for cranio-maxillofacial anthropometric measurements","volume":"18","author":"Metzler P","year":"2014","unstructured":"Metzler P, Sun Y, Zemann W, et al.. Validity of the 3D VECTRA photogrammetric surface imaging system for cranio-maxillofacial anthropometric measurements. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014, 18:297-304. 10.1007\/s10006-013-0404-7","journal-title":"Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcms.2012.11.041","article-title":"Accuracy of medical models made by additive manufacturing (rapid manufacturing)","volume":"41","author":"Salmi M","year":"2013","unstructured":"Salmi M, Paloheimo KS, Tuomi J, et al.. Accuracy of medical models made by additive manufacturing (rapid manufacturing). J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013, 41:603-9. 10.1016\/j.jcms.2012.11.041","journal-title":"J Craniomaxillofac Surg"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2017.05.025","article-title":"Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques","volume":"153","author":"Kim SY","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kim SY, Shin YS, Jung HD, Hwang CJ, Baik HS, Cha JY. Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018, 153:144-53. 10.1016\/j.ajodo.2017.05.025","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x","article-title":"Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review","volume":"14","author":"Fleming PS","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011, 14:1-16. 10.1111\/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x","journal-title":"Orthod Craniofac Res"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1179\/146531207225022626","article-title":"A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy","volume":"35","author":"Keating AP","year":"2008","unstructured":"Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov AI. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod. 2008, 35:191-201. 10.1179\/146531207225022626","journal-title":"J Orthod"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1054\/ijom.2000.0135","article-title":"Analysis of errors in medical rapid prototyping models","volume":"31","author":"Choi JY","year":"2002","unstructured":"Choi JY, Choi JH, Kim NK, et al.. Analysis of errors in medical rapid prototyping models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002, 31:23-32. 10.1054\/ijom.2000.0135","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjy063","article-title":"Comparing retainers constructed on conventional stone models and on 3D printed models: a randomized crossover clinical study","volume":"41","author":"Mohd Tahir N","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mohd Tahir N, Wan Hassan WN, Saub R. Comparing retainers constructed on conventional stone models and on 3D printed models: a randomized crossover clinical study. Eur J Orthod. 2019, 41:370-80. 10.1093\/ejo\/cjy063","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2017.03.012","article-title":"Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases","volume":"151","author":"Camardella LT","year":"2017","unstructured":"Camardella LT, de Vasconcellos Vilella O, Breuning H. Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017, 151:1178-87. 10.1016\/j.ajodo.2017.03.012","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1179\/1465313313Y.0000000066","article-title":"Retention protocols and use of vacuum-formed retainers among specialist orthodontists","volume":"40","author":"Meade MJ","year":"2013","unstructured":"Meade MJ, Millett D. Retention protocols and use of vacuum-formed retainers among specialist orthodontists. J Orthod. 2013, 40:318-25. 10.1179\/1465313313Y.0000000066","journal-title":"J Orthod"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2016.10.019","article-title":"Comparison of survival time and comfort between 2 clear overlay retainers with different thicknesses: a pilot randomized controlled trial","volume":"151","author":"Zhu Y","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zhu Y, Lin J, Long H, et al.. Comparison of survival time and comfort between 2 clear overlay retainers with different thicknesses: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017, 151:433-9. 10.1016\/j.ajodo.2016.10.019","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjx024","article-title":"Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial","volume":"39","author":"Saleh M","year":"2017","unstructured":"Saleh M, Hajeer MY, Muessig D. Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2017, 39:453-61. 10.1093\/ejo\/cjx024","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2006.06.019","article-title":"The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial","volume":"132","author":"Rowland H","year":"2007","unstructured":"Rowland H, Hichens L, Williams A, et al.. The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007, 132:730-7. 10.1016\/j.ajodo.2006.06.019","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0889-5406(03)00502-x","article-title":"Wear comparison of thermoplastic materials used for orthodontic retainers","volume":"124","author":"Gardner GD","year":"2003","unstructured":"Gardner GD, Dunn WJ, Taloumis L. Wear comparison of thermoplastic materials used for orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003, 124:294-7. 10.1016\/s0889-5406(03)00502-x","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/220483-an-in-vivo-study-to-compare-the-clinical-effectiveness-of-clear-retainer-made-on-a-conventional-and-a-digitally-fabricated-model-over-a-six-month-period-after-debonding","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,23]],"date-time":"2024-02-23T09:15:35Z","timestamp":1708679735000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/220483-an-in-vivo-study-to-compare-the-clinical-effectiveness-of-clear-retainer-made-on-a-conventional-and-a-digitally-fabricated-model-over-a-six-month-period-after-debonding"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,23]]},"references-count":22,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.54740","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,23]]}}}