{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T16:51:18Z","timestamp":1788454278771,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,23]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.60932","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,23]],"date-time":"2024-05-23T13:56:45Z","timestamp":1716472605000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["The Novel Parallel Closure Technique Compared to Single-Layer Closure of the Uterus After Primary Cesarean Section Decreases the Incidence of Isthmocele Formation and Increases Residual Myometrial Thickness"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Ebru","family":"Alper","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ece","family":"Aksakal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Irem","family":"Usta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bulent","family":"Urman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","article-title":"Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates","volume":"6","author":"Betran AP","year":"2021","unstructured":"Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021, 6:e005671. 10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","journal-title":"BMJ Glob Health"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19049","article-title":"Sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi procedure","volume":"53","author":"Jordans IP","year":"2019","unstructured":"Jordans IP, de Leeuw RA, Stegwee SI, et al.. Sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019, 53:107-15. 10.1002\/uog.19049","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20225","article-title":"Early first-trimester transvaginal ultrasound is indicated in pregnancy after previous cesarean delivery: should it be mandatory?","volume":"54","author":"Timor-Tritsch IE","year":"2019","unstructured":"Timor-Tritsch IE, D'Antonio F, Cal\u00ed G, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Meyer J, Monteagudo A. Early first-trimester transvaginal ultrasound is indicated in pregnancy after previous cesarean delivery: should it be mandatory?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019, 54:156-63. 10.1002\/uog.20225","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2023.102363","article-title":"Aetiology, risk factors and preventive strategies for niche development: a review","volume":"90","author":"Verberkt C","year":"2023","unstructured":"Verberkt C, Lemmers M, de Vries R, Stegwee SI, de Leeuw RA, Huirne JA. Aetiology, risk factors and preventive strategies for niche development: a review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2023, 90:102363. 10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2023.102363","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.04.012","article-title":"The association between uterine scar defect (niche) and the presence of symptoms","volume":"47","author":"Mohr-Sasson A","year":"2023","unstructured":"Mohr-Sasson A, Dadon T, Brandt A, et al.. The association between uterine scar defect (niche) and the presence of symptoms. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023, 47:103221. 10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.04.012","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.11.007","article-title":"Isthmocele, not cesarean section per se, reduces in\u00a0vitro fertilization success: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 10,000 embryo transfer cycles","volume":"121","author":"Vitagliano A","year":"2024","unstructured":"Vitagliano A, Cicinelli E, Vigan\u00f2 P, et al.. Isthmocele, not cesarean section per se, reduces in\u00a0vitro fertilization success: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 10,000 embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2024, 121:299-313. 10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.11.007","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101933","article-title":"A comparison of the effects of two suture materials on isthmocele formation: a cohort study","volume":"50","author":"Hosseini R","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hosseini R, Mansoorli S, Pirjani R, Eslamian L, Rabiee M. A comparison of the effects of two suture materials on isthmocele formation: a cohort study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021, 50:101933. 10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101933","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2012.01872.x","article-title":"Ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic outcomes of uterine scar healing after cesarean section: comparison of two types of single-layer suture","volume":"38","author":"Ceci O","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ceci O, Cantatore C, Scioscia M, Nardelli C, Ravi M, Vimercati A, Bettocchi S. Ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic outcomes of uterine scar healing after cesarean section: comparison of two types of single-layer suture. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012, 38:1302-7. 10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2012.01872.x","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.03.023","article-title":"Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: is it preventable?","volume":"124","author":"Yazicioglu F","year":"2006","unstructured":"Yazicioglu F, G\u00f6kdogan A, Kelekci S, Ayg\u00fcn M, Savan K. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: is it preventable?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006, 124:32-6. 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.03.023","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16472","article-title":"Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial","volume":"128","author":"Stegwee SI","year":"2021","unstructured":"Stegwee SI, van der Voet LF, Ben AJ, et al.. Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial. BJOG. 2021, 128:866-78. 10.1111\/1471-0528.16472","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.12.032","article-title":"Single-layer vs double-layer uterine closure during cesarean delivery: 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial (2Close study) [in press]","author":"Verberkt C","year":"2023","unstructured":"Verberkt C, Stegwee SI, Van der Voet LF, et al.. Single-layer vs double-layer uterine closure during cesarean delivery: 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial (2Close study) [in press]. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023, 10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.12.032","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.006","article-title":"Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 2)","volume":"219","author":"Caughey AB","year":"2018","unstructured":"Caughey AB, Wood SL, Macones GA, et al.. Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 2). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018, 219:533-44. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev240","article-title":"Why do niches develop in caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development","volume":"30","author":"Vervoort AJ","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vervoort AJ, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJ, Br\u00f6lmann HA, Mol BW, Huirne JA. Why do niches develop in caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Hum Reprod. 2015, 30:2695-702. 10.1093\/humrep\/dev240","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13714","article-title":"Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one\u00a0year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure","volume":"99","author":"Hanacek J","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hanacek J, Vojtech J, Urbankova I, Krcmar M, K\u0159epelka P, Feyereisl J, Krofta L. Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one\u00a0year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020, 99:69-78. 10.1111\/aogs.13714","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916","article-title":"Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"214","author":"Roberge S","year":"2016","unstructured":"Roberge S, Demers S, Girard M, et al.. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016, 214:507.e1-6. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.916","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2021.102282","article-title":"Double-layered purse string uterine suture compared with single-layer continuous uterine suture: a randomized Controlled trial","volume":"51","author":"Dimassi K","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dimassi K, Ami O, Merai R, Velemir L, Simon B, Fauck D, Triki A. Double-layered purse string uterine suture compared with single-layer continuous uterine suture: a randomized Controlled trial. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022, 51:102282. 10.1016\/j.jogoh.2021.102282","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2021.1910636","article-title":"A new technique for uterine incision closure at the time of cesarean section: does it make a difference?","volume":"42","author":"Elkhouly NI","year":"2022","unstructured":"Elkhouly NI, Abdelaal NK, Solyman AE, Elkelani OA, Elbasueny BF, Elhalaby AF. A new technique for uterine incision closure at the time of cesarean section: does it make a difference?. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022, 42:416-23. 10.1080\/01443615.2021.1910636","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.21608\/ejhm.2022.263571","article-title":"Sonohysterographic evaluation of cesarean scar defect after purse-string versus double-layer uterine closure techniques: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"89","author":"Heraiz AI","year":"2022","unstructured":"Heraiz AI, Ibrahem MA, Hamed B. Sonohysterographic evaluation of cesarean scar defect after purse-string versus double-layer uterine closure techniques: a randomized controlled trial. Egyptian J Hosp Med. 2022, 89:5367-74.","journal-title":"Egyptian J Hosp Med"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12593","article-title":"Purse-string double-layer closure: a novel technique for repairing the uterine incision during cesarean section","volume":"41","author":"Turan C","year":"2015","unstructured":"Turan C, B\u00fcy\u00fckbayrak EE, Yilmaz AO, Karsidag YK, Pirimoglu M. Purse-string double-layer closure: a novel technique for repairing the uterine incision during cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015, 41:565-74. 10.1111\/jog.12593","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12334","article-title":"Changes in cesarean section scar dimensions during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study","volume":"41","author":"Naji O","year":"2013","unstructured":"Naji O, Daemen A, Smith A, et al.. Changes in cesarean section scar dimensions during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013, 41:556-62. 10.1002\/uog.12334","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.01.009","article-title":"Uterine scar rupture - prediction, prevention, diagnosis, and management","volume":"59","author":"Tanos V","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tanos V, Toney ZA. Uterine scar rupture - prediction, prevention, diagnosis, and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019, 59:115-31. 10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.01.009","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.01.033","article-title":"Assessing lateral uterine wall defects and residual myometrial thickness after cesarean section","volume":"258","author":"Al Naimi A","year":"2021","unstructured":"Al Naimi A, Mouzakiti N, Wolnicki B, Louwen F, Bahlmann F. Assessing lateral uterine wall defects and residual myometrial thickness after cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021, 258:391-5. 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.01.033","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/253255-the-novel-parallel-closure-technique-compared-to-single-layer-closure-of-the-uterus-after-primary-cesarean-section-decreases-the-incidence-of-isthmocele-formation-and-increases-residual-myometrial-thickness","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,23]],"date-time":"2024-05-23T13:57:03Z","timestamp":1716472623000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/253255-the-novel-parallel-closure-technique-compared-to-single-layer-closure-of-the-uterus-after-primary-cesarean-section-decreases-the-incidence-of-isthmocele-formation-and-increases-residual-myometrial-thickness"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,23]]},"references-count":22,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.60932","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,23]]}}}