{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,10]],"date-time":"2026-10-10T06:28:51Z","timestamp":1791613731191,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,1]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.70632","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,1]],"date-time":"2024-10-01T11:41:03Z","timestamp":1727782863000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Comparing the Diagnostic Efficacy of 3D Ultrasound and MRI in the Classification of M\u00fcllerian Anomalies"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Karthik Krishna","family":"Ramakrishnan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stany","family":"Jerosha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sakthi Ganesh","family":"Subramonian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Meenakshi","family":"Murugappan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paarthipan","family":"Natarajan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmv048","article-title":"The presentation and management of complex female genital malformations","volume":"22","author":"Aci\u00e9n P","year":"2016","unstructured":"Aci\u00e9n P, Aci\u00e9n M. The presentation and management of complex female genital malformations. Hum Reprod Update. 2016, 22:48-69. 10.1093\/humupd\/dmv048","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det098","article-title":"The ESHRE\/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies","volume":"28","author":"Grimbizis GF","year":"2013","unstructured":"Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al.. The ESHRE\/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013, 28:2032-44. 10.1093\/humrep\/det098","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmr028","article-title":"The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review","volume":"17","author":"Chan YY","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011, 17:761-71. 10.1093\/humupd\/dmr028","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmn018","article-title":"Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal","volume":"14","author":"Saravelos SH","year":"2008","unstructured":"Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2008, 14:415-29. 10.1093\/humupd\/dmn018","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/99354802","article-title":"Mullerian duct anomalies: from diagnosis to intervention","volume":"82","author":"Chandler TM","year":"2009","unstructured":"Chandler TM, Machan LS, Cooperberg PL, Harris AC, Chang SD. Mullerian duct anomalies: from diagnosis to intervention. Br J Radiol. 2009, 82:1034-42. 10.1259\/bjr\/99354802","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu344","article-title":"Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of M\u00fcllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice","volume":"30","author":"Ludwin A","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ludwin A, Ludwin I. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of M\u00fcllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice. Hum Reprod. 2015, 30:569-80. 10.1093\/humrep\/deu344","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2000-13723","article-title":"Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss","volume":"18","author":"Propst AM","year":"2000","unstructured":"Propst AM, Hill JA 3rd. Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med. 2000, 18:341-50. 10.1055\/s-2000-13723","journal-title":"Semin Reprod Med"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14825","article-title":"Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of M\u00fcllerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract","volume":"46","author":"Graupera B","year":"2015","unstructured":"Graupera B, Pascual MA, Hereter L, Browne JL, \u00dabeda B, Rodr\u00edguez I, Pedrero C. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of M\u00fcllerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015, 46:616-22. 10.1002\/uog.14825","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7551","article-title":"Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of M\u00fcllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"35","author":"Bermejo C","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bermejo C, Mart\u00ednez Ten P, Cantarero R, et al.. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of M\u00fcllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 35:593-601. 10.1002\/uog.7551","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics13040807","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of two-dimensional ultrasound, two-dimensional sonohysterography and three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of septate uterus-a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"13","author":"Alc\u00e1zar JL","year":"2023","unstructured":"Alc\u00e1zar JL, Carriles I, Cajas MB, et al.. Diagnostic performance of two-dimensional ultrasound, two-dimensional sonohysterography and three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of septate uterus-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023, 13:807. 10.3390\/diagnostics13040807","journal-title":"Diagnostics (Basel)"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2217\/whe.10.61","article-title":"Uterine cavity assessment prior to IVF","volume":"6","author":"Pundir J","year":"2010","unstructured":"Pundir J, El Toukhy T. Uterine cavity assessment prior to IVF. Womens Health (Lond). 2010, 6:841-7; quiz 847-8. 10.2217\/whe.10.61","journal-title":"Womens Health (Lond)"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.24771","article-title":"M\u00fcllerian duct anomalies: embryological development, classification, and MRI assessment","volume":"41","author":"Robbins JB","year":"2015","unstructured":"Robbins JB, Broadwell C, Chow LC, Parry JP, Sadowski EA. M\u00fcllerian duct anomalies: embryological development, classification, and MRI assessment. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015, 41:1-12. 10.1002\/jmri.24771","journal-title":"J Magn Reson Imaging"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.07.966","article-title":"Laparoscopic removal of the cavitated noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn: surgical aspects in 10 cases","volume":"83","author":"Fedele L","year":"2005","unstructured":"Fedele L, Bianchi S, Zanconato G, Berlanda N, Bergamini V. Laparoscopic removal of the cavitated noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn: surgical aspects in 10 cases. Fertil Steril. 2005, 83:432-6. 10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.07.966","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.127","article-title":"Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies","volume":"21","author":"Salim R","year":"2003","unstructured":"Salim R, Woelfer B, Backos M, Regan L, Jurkovic D. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003, 21:578-82. 10.1002\/uog.127","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2008.27.3.413","article-title":"The role of 3-dimensional ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of m\u00fcllerian duct anomalies: a review of the literature","volume":"27","author":"Deutch TD","year":"2008","unstructured":"Deutch TD, Abuhamad AZ. The role of 3-dimensional ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of m\u00fcllerian duct anomalies: a review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med. 2008, 27:413-23. 10.7863\/jum.2008.27.3.413","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0015-0282(16)59942-7","article-title":"The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, M\u00fcllerian anomalies, and intrauterine adhesions","volume":"49","year":"1988","unstructured":"The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, M\u00fcllerian anomalies, and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988, 49.944-55. 10.1016\/s0015-0282(16)59942-7","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-015-0909-1","article-title":"The Thessaloniki ESHRE\/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies","volume":"13","author":"Grimbizis GF","year":"2016","unstructured":"Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, et al.. The Thessaloniki ESHRE\/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Gynecol Surg. 2016, 13:1-16. 10.1007\/s10397-015-0909-1","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.326125515","article-title":"Imaging of m\u00fcllerian duct anomalies","volume":"32","author":"Behr SC","year":"2012","unstructured":"Behr SC, Courtier JL, Qayyum A. Imaging of m\u00fcllerian duct anomalies. Radiographics. 2012, 32:E233-50. 10.1148\/rg.326125515","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10009-1490","article-title":"Application of 3D ultrasonography in detection of uterine abnormalities","volume":"4","author":"Ahmadi F","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ahmadi F, Zafarani F, Haghighi H, Niknejadi M, Dizaj AV. Application of 3D ultrasonography in detection of uterine abnormalities. Int J Fertil Steril. 2011, 4:144-7. 10.5005\/jp-journals-10009-1490","journal-title":"Int J Fertil Steril"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2008-1076141","article-title":"Congenital malformations of the uterus: the role of ultrasound","volume":"26","author":"Puscheck EE","year":"2008","unstructured":"Puscheck EE, Cohen L. Congenital malformations of the uterus: the role of ultrasound. Semin Reprod Med. 2008, 26:223-31. 10.1055\/s-2008-1076141","journal-title":"Semin Reprod Med"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2331020777","article-title":"Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues","volume":"233","author":"Troiano RN","year":"2004","unstructured":"Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology. 2004, 233:19-34. 10.1148\/radiol.2331020777","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.20662","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of real-time 3D sonography in the diagnosis of congenital Mullerian anomalies in high-risk patients with respect to the phase of the menstrual cycle","volume":"38","author":"Caliskan E","year":"2010","unstructured":"Caliskan E, Ozkan S, Cakiroglu Y, Sarisoy HT, Corakci A, Ozeren S. Diagnostic accuracy of real-time 3D sonography in the diagnosis of congenital Mullerian anomalies in high-risk patients with respect to the phase of the menstrual cycle. J Clin Ultrasound. 2010, 38:123-7. 10.1002\/jcu.20662","journal-title":"J Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.05.086","article-title":"Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies","volume":"92","author":"Ghi T","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ghi T, Casadio P, Kuleva M, et al.. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies. Fertil Steril. 2009, 92:808-13. 10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.05.086","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1995.05040233.x","article-title":"Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography","volume":"5","author":"Jurkovic D","year":"1995","unstructured":"Jurkovic D, Geipel A, Gruboeck K, Jauniaux E, Natucci M, Campbell S. Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995, 5:233-7. 10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1995.05040233.x","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.183.3.1584936","article-title":"Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography","volume":"183","author":"Pellerito JS","year":"1992","unstructured":"Pellerito JS, McCarthy SM, Doyle MB, Glickman MG, DeCherney AH. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology. 1992, 183:795-800. 10.1148\/radiology.183.3.1584936","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.26073","article-title":"Reproductive outcome in 326 women with unicornuate uterus","volume":"61","author":"Tellum T","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tellum T, Bracco B, De Braud LV, et al.. Reproductive outcome in 326 women with unicornuate uterus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023, 61:99-108. 10.1002\/uog.26073","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/12.10.2277","article-title":"Reproductive impact of congenital M\u00fcllerian anomalies","volume":"12","author":"Raga F","year":"1997","unstructured":"Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Sim\u00f3n C, Pellicer A. Reproductive impact of congenital M\u00fcllerian anomalies. Hum Reprod. 1997, 12:2277-81. 10.1093\/humrep\/12.10.2277","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/260266-comparing-the-diagnostic-efficacy-of-3d-ultrasound-and-mri-in-the-classification-of-mllerian-anomalies","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,1]],"date-time":"2024-10-01T11:41:05Z","timestamp":1727782865000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/260266-comparing-the-diagnostic-efficacy-of-3d-ultrasound-and-mri-in-the-classification-of-mllerian-anomalies"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,1]]},"references-count":27,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.70632","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,1]]}}}