{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,12]],"date-time":"2024-10-12T13:40:36Z","timestamp":1728740436230},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,12]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.71302","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,12]],"date-time":"2024-10-12T13:02:32Z","timestamp":1728738152000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Induction of Labor: A Narrative Review on Cost Efficiency in Maternity Care"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Alaa","family":"Mamieh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kritanjali","family":"Saha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Saya","family":"Alasaadi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shayla L","family":"Holman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Flavio","family":"Veintemilla-Burgos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lucia","family":"Santistevan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shama Rani","family":"Paul","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Maria","family":"Kamel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pinima","family":"Godpower","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lasya","family":"Reddy Pesaru","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.02.009","article-title":"Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety","volume":"230","author":"Sanchez-Ramos L","year":"2024","unstructured":"Sanchez-Ramos L, Levine LD, Sciscione AC, et al.. Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024, 230:S669-95. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.02.009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.993965","article-title":"The indication for induction of labor impacts the risk of cesarean delivery","volume":"29","author":"Parkes I","year":"2016","unstructured":"Parkes I, Kabiri D, Hants Y, Ezra Y. The indication for induction of labor impacts the risk of cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016, 29:224-8. 10.3109\/14767058.2014.993965","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004447","article-title":"Medically indicated late-preterm and early-term deliveries: ACOG committee opinion, number 831","volume":"138","year":"2021","unstructured":"Medically indicated late-preterm and early-term deliveries. ACOG committee opinion, number 831. Obstet Gynecol. 2021, 138:e35-9. 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004447","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.07.004","article-title":"The history of labour induction: how did we get here?","volume":"77","author":"Drife JO","year":"2021","unstructured":"Drife JO. The history of labour induction: how did we get here?. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021, 77:3-14. 10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.07.004","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14447","article-title":"Trends in labor induction indications: a 20-year population-based study","volume":"101","author":"Swift EM","year":"2022","unstructured":"Swift EM, Gunnarsdottir J, Zoega H, Bjarnadottir RI, Steingrimsdottir T, Einarsdottir K. Trends in labor induction indications: a 20-year population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022, 101:1422-30. 10.1111\/aogs.14447","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-020-03398-6","article-title":"Trends in cesarean delivery rates in primipara and the associated factors","volume":"20","author":"Sun G","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sun G, Lin Y, Lu H, et al.. Trends in cesarean delivery rates in primipara and the associated factors. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020, 20:715. 10.1186\/s12884-020-03398-6","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9781032719092","article-title":"The Dignity of Labour?","author":"Cartwright A","year":"2024","unstructured":"Cartwright A. The Dignity of Labour?. Routledge, London; 2024. 10.4324\/9781032719092"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13743","article-title":"Maternal age and risk of cesarean section in women with induced labor at term-a Nordic register-based study","volume":"99","author":"Bergholt T","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bergholt T, Skjeldestad FE, Pyyk\u00f6nen A, et al.. Maternal age and risk of cesarean section in women with induced labor at term-a Nordic register-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020, 99:283-9. 10.1111\/aogs.13743","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.023","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labor","volume":"269","author":"Gupta J","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gupta J, Baev O, Duro Gomez J, et al.. Mechanical methods for induction of labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022, 269:138-42. 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.023","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-11-84","article-title":"Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review","volume":"11","author":"Mozurkewich EL","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mozurkewich EL, Chilimigras JL, Berman DR, Perni UC, Romero VC, King VJ, Keeton KL. Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011, 11:84. 10.1186\/1471-2393-11-84","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13981","article-title":"Methods to induce labour: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"123","author":"Alfirevic Z","year":"2016","unstructured":"Alfirevic Z, Keeney E, Dowswell T, et al.. Methods to induce labour: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. BJOG. 2016, 123:1462-70. 10.1111\/1471-0528.13981","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.012","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women","volume":"204","author":"Kaimal AJ","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kaimal AJ, Little SE, Odibo AO, et al.. Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011, 204:137.e1-9. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.03.020","article-title":"Induction of labor using balloon catheter as an outpatient versus prostaglandin as an inpatient: a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"260","author":"Merollini KM","year":"2021","unstructured":"Merollini KM, Beckmann M. Induction of labor using balloon catheter as an outpatient versus prostaglandin as an inpatient: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021, 260:124-30. 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.03.020","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.005","article-title":"Induction of labor for a suspected large-for-gestational-age\/macrosomic fetus","volume":"77","author":"Chandrasekaran N","year":"2021","unstructured":"Chandrasekaran N. Induction of labor for a suspected large-for-gestational-age\/macrosomic fetus. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021, 77:110-8. 10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.005","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2019.100479","article-title":"Which level of risk justifies routine induction of labor for healthy women?","volume":"23","author":"Seijmonsbergen-Schermers AE","year":"2020","unstructured":"Seijmonsbergen-Schermers AE, Peters LL, Goodarzi B, et al.. Which level of risk justifies routine induction of labor for healthy women?. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2020, 23:100479. 10.1016\/j.srhc.2019.100479","journal-title":"Sex Reprod Healthc"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.17587.1","article-title":"Recent advances in the induction of labor","volume":"8","author":"Marconi AM","year":"2019","unstructured":"Marconi AM. Recent advances in the induction of labor. F1000Res. 2019, 8:10.12688\/f1000research.17587.1","journal-title":"F1000Res"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000752","article-title":"Induction of labor: an overview of guidelines","volume":"75","author":"Tsakiridis I","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, Athanasiadis A, Dagklis T. Induction of labor: an overview of guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2020, 75:61-72. 10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000752","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/63463","article-title":"Stimulation therapy to induce mothers: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial","volume":"13","author":"Tortal D","year":"2024","unstructured":"Tortal D, Shabanova V, Taylor S, et al.. Stimulation therapy to induce mothers: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024, 13:e63463. 10.2196\/63463","journal-title":"JMIR Res Protoc"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02889.x","article-title":"Maternal obesity and labour complications following induction of labour in prolonged pregnancy","volume":"118","author":"Arrowsmith S","year":"2011","unstructured":"Arrowsmith S, Wray S, Quenby S. Maternal obesity and labour complications following induction of labour in prolonged pregnancy. BJOG. 2011, 118:578-88. 10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02889.x","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21608\/EJHM.2018.16180","article-title":"Rules of induction of labor, complication and benefits","volume":"23","author":"Alhazmi AA","year":"2018","unstructured":"Alhazmi AA, Ali M, Al M, et al.. Rules of induction of labor, complication and benefits. Egyptian J Hosp Med. 2018, 23:6767-72. 10.21608\/EJHM.2018.16180","journal-title":"Egyptian J Hosp Med"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-3016.2001.00337.x","article-title":"Risks of induction of labour in uncomplicated term pregnancies","volume":"15","author":"Boulvain M","year":"2001","unstructured":"Boulvain M, Marcoux S, Bureau M, Fortier M, Fraser W. Risks of induction of labour in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001, 15:131-8. 10.1046\/j.1365-3016.2001.00337.x","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014","article-title":"Risk of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications associated with the use of the transcervical balloon catheter in induction of labour: a systematic review","volume":"218","author":"Gommers JS","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gommers JS, Diederen M, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Mol BW. Risk of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications associated with the use of the transcervical balloon catheter in induction of labour: a systematic review. Eur J Obst Gynec Reprod Biol. 2017, 218:73-84. 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014","journal-title":"Eur J Obst Gynec Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017","article-title":"Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"220","author":"Hersh AR","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hersh AR, Skeith AE, Sargent JA, Caughey AB. Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019, 220:590.e1-e10. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000022","article-title":"Costs of elective induction of labor","volume":"57","author":"Grobman WA","year":"2014","unstructured":"Grobman WA. Costs of elective induction of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014, 57:363-8. 10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000022","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.870","article-title":"847 Elective induction of labor at 38 weeks during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"224","author":"Schmidt EM","year":"2021","unstructured":"Schmidt EM, Hersh AR, Packer CH, Zhou C, Skeith AE, Caughey AB. 847 Elective induction of labor at 38 weeks during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021, 224:526-7. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.870","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eurox.2023.100178","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of induction of labour at 41 weeks and expectant management until 42 weeks in low risk women (INDEX trial)","volume":"17","author":"Bruinsma A","year":"2023","unstructured":"Bruinsma A, Keulen JK, van Eekelen R, et al.. Cost-effectiveness analysis of induction of labour at 41 weeks and expectant management until 42 weeks in low risk women (INDEX trial). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023, 17:100178. 10.1016\/j.eurox.2023.100178","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.08.022","article-title":"Economic implications of labor induction","volume":"133","author":"Garcia-Simon R","year":"2016","unstructured":"Garcia-Simon R, Monta\u00f1es A, Clemente J, Del Pino MD, Romero MA, Fabre E, Oros D. Economic implications of labor induction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016, 133:112-5. 10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.08.022","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1668591","article-title":"Induction of labor versus scheduled cesarean in morbidly obese women: a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"36","author":"Hopkins MK","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hopkins MK, Grotegut CA, Swamy GK, Myers ER, Havrilesky LJ. Induction of labor versus scheduled cesarean in morbidly obese women: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Perinatol. 2019, 36:399-405. 10.1055\/s-0038-1668591","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1119113","article-title":"Planned cesarean delivery compared to induction of labor in women with class III obesity: a cost-minimization analysis","volume":"29","author":"Subramaniam A","year":"2016","unstructured":"Subramaniam A, Corvey KJ, Kilgore ML, Edwards RK. Planned cesarean delivery compared to induction of labor in women with class III obesity: a cost-minimization analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016, 29:3084-8. 10.3109\/14767058.2015.1119113","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/13696998.2022.2053432","article-title":"Oral misoprostol tablets (25 \u00b5g) for induction of labor: a targeted literature review and cost analysis","volume":"25","author":"Poinas AC","year":"2022","unstructured":"Poinas AC, Padgett K, Heus R, Perrotin F, Devlieger R. Oral misoprostol tablets (25 \u00b5g) for induction of labor: a targeted literature review and cost analysis. J Med Econ. 2022, 25:428-36. 10.1080\/13696998.2022.2053432","journal-title":"J Med Econ"},{"key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003865","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal hospitalization costs associated with elective induction of labor at term in California, 2007-2011","volume":"136","author":"Hersh AR","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hersh AR, Greiner KS, Garg B, Skeith AE, Caughey AB. Maternal and neonatal hospitalization costs associated with elective induction of labor at term in California, 2007-2011. Obstet Gynecol. 2020, 136:8-18. 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003865","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12329","article-title":"Economic analysis comparing induction of labor and expectant management in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes between 34 and 37\u00a0weeks (PPROMEXIL trial)","volume":"93","author":"Vijgen SM","year":"2014","unstructured":"Vijgen SM, van der Ham DP, Bijlenga D, et al.. Economic analysis comparing induction of labor and expectant management in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes between 34 and 37\u00a0weeks (PPROMEXIL trial). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014, 93:374-81. 10.1111\/aogs.12329","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12325-016-0397-3","article-title":"Misoprostol vaginal insert in labor induction: a cost-consequences model for 5 European countries-an economic evaluation supported with literature review and retrospective data collection","volume":"33","author":"Bierut A","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bierut A, Dowgia\u0142\u0142o-Smolarczyk J, Pieni\u0105\u017cek I, et al.. Misoprostol vaginal insert in labor induction: a cost-consequences model for 5 European countries-an economic evaluation supported with literature review and retrospective data collection. Adv Ther. 2016, 33:1755-70. 10.1007\/s12325-016-0397-3","journal-title":"Adv Ther"},{"key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.09.003","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of dilation and evacuation versus the induction of labor for second-trimester pregnancy termination","volume":"194","author":"Cowett AA","year":"2006","unstructured":"Cowett AA, Golub RM, Grobman WA. Cost-effectiveness of dilation and evacuation versus the induction of labor for second-trimester pregnancy termination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006, 194:768-73. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.09.003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2298\/sarh1412688l","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of different types of labor for singleton pregnancy: real life data","volume":"142","author":"Laki\u0107 D","year":"2014","unstructured":"Laki\u0107 D, Petrovi\u0107 B, Petrova G. Cost-effectiveness analysis of different types of labor for singleton pregnancy: real life data. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2014, 142:688-94. 10.2298\/sarh1412688l","journal-title":"Srp Arh Celok Lek"},{"key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003930","article-title":"Cost of elective labor induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women","volume":"136","author":"Einerson BD","year":"2020","unstructured":"Einerson BD, Nelson RE, Sandoval G, et al.. Cost of elective labor induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women. Obst Gynec. 2020, 136:19-25. 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003930","journal-title":"Obst Gynec"},{"key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.01.041","article-title":"Induction of labor using prostaglandin vaginal gel: cost analysis comparing early amniotomy with repeat prostaglandin gel","volume":"199","author":"Beckmann M","year":"2016","unstructured":"Beckmann M, Merollini K, Kumar S, Flenady V. Induction of labor using prostaglandin vaginal gel: cost analysis comparing early amniotomy with repeat prostaglandin gel. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016, 199:96-101. 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.01.041","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12568","article-title":"Outpatient Foley catheter induction protocol provides clinical and cost benefits","volume":"48","author":"Washburn MC","year":"2021","unstructured":"Washburn MC, Washburn M, Hong C, Roth P, Richter P. Outpatient Foley catheter induction protocol provides clinical and cost benefits. Birth. 2021, 48:574-82. 10.1111\/birt.12568","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"ref39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.127147","article-title":"Elective induction: an analysis of economic and health consequences","volume":"187","author":"Kaufman KE","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kaufman KE, Bailit JL, Grobman W. Elective induction: an analysis of economic and health consequences. Am J Obst Gynec. 2002, 187:858-63. 10.1067\/mob.2002.127147","journal-title":"Am J Obst Gynec"},{"key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/13696998.2022.2136854","article-title":"Moving preinduction cervical ripening to a lower acuity inpatient setting using the synthetic hygroscopic cervical dilator: a cost-consequence analysis for the United States","volume":"25","author":"Saunders SJ","year":"2022","unstructured":"Saunders SJ, Grisamore JL, Wong T, Torrejon Torres R, Saunders R, Einerson B. Moving preinduction cervical ripening to a lower acuity inpatient setting using the synthetic hygroscopic cervical dilator: a cost-consequence analysis for the United States. J Med Econ. 2022, 25:1185-98. 10.1080\/13696998.2022.2136854","journal-title":"J Med Econ"},{"key":"ref41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.10.635","article-title":"Economic implications of method of delivery","volume":"193","author":"Allen VM","year":"2005","unstructured":"Allen VM, O\u2019Connell CM, Farrell SA, Baskett TF. Economic implications of method of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 193:192-7. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.10.635","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0149-2918(96)80224-4","article-title":"A cost-minimization analysis of intracervical prostaglandin E, for cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting","volume":"18","author":"Farmer KC","year":"1996","unstructured":"Farmer KC, Sch\u2019wartz Iii WJ, Rayburn WE, Turnbull G. A cost-minimization analysis of intracervical prostaglandin E, for cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting. Clin Ther. 1996, 18:747-56. 10.1016\/s0149-2918(96)80224-4","journal-title":"Clin Ther"},{"key":"ref43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20140","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor at 39 weeks in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a meta-analysis","volume":"53","author":"Sotiriadis A","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sotiriadis A, Petousis S, Thilaganathan B, et al.. Maternal and perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor at 39 weeks in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019, 53:26-35. 10.1002\/uog.20140","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.016","article-title":"Induction of labor in the United States: a critical appraisal of appropriateness and reducibility","volume":"36","author":"Chauhan SP","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chauhan SP, Ananth CV. Induction of labor in the United States: a critical appraisal of appropriateness and reducibility. Semin Perinatol. 2012, 36:336-43. 10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.016","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"ref45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.15378","article-title":"Membrane sweeping at term to promote spontaneous labor and reduce the likelihood of formal labor induction for prolonged pregnancy, in South Asia and the world: a meta-analysis","volume":"166","author":"Jayasundara DM","year":"2024","unstructured":"Jayasundara DM, Jayawardane IA, Denuwara HM, Jayasingha TD. Membrane sweeping at term to promote spontaneous labor and reduce the likelihood of formal labor induction for prolonged pregnancy, in South Asia and the world: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024, 166:567-79. 10.1002\/ijgo.15378","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003696","article-title":"Risk calculator to predict cesarean delivery among women undergoing induction of labor","volume":"135","author":"Rossi RM","year":"2020","unstructured":"Rossi RM, Requarth E, Warshak CR, Dufendach KR, Hall ES, DeFranco EA. Risk calculator to predict cesarean delivery among women undergoing induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2020, 135:559-68. 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003696","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/301017-induction-of-labor-a-narrative-review-on-cost-efficiency-in-maternity-care","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,12]],"date-time":"2024-10-12T13:02:35Z","timestamp":1728738155000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/301017-induction-of-labor-a-narrative-review-on-cost-efficiency-in-maternity-care"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,12]]},"references-count":46,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.71302","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,12]]}}}