{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]],"date-time":"2026-06-02T08:11:55Z","timestamp":1780387915743,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,30]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.72712","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,30]],"date-time":"2024-10-30T16:42:52Z","timestamp":1730306572000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Assessment of Postoperative Complications Between Interrupted Modified Smead-Jones Rectus Closure and Conventional Rectus Closure in Midline Laparotomy Wounds: A Comparative Study"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Aiswerya","family":"Shankar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"B. V.","family":"Sreedevi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sundeep","family":"Selvamuthukumaran","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sunidhi","family":"Rajput","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pola Govardhan","family":"Kumar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-012-1019-4","article-title":"Closing midline abdominal incisions","volume":"397","author":"Israelsson LA","year":"2012","unstructured":"Israelsson LA, Millbourn D. Closing midline abdominal incisions. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012, 397:1201-7. 10.1007\/s00423-012-1019-4","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9364","article-title":"Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy","volume":"101","author":"Fink C","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fink C, Baumann P, Wente MN, et al.. Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy. Br J Surg. 2014, 101:51-4. 10.1002\/bjs.9364","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20201529","article-title":"Abdominal midline wound closure with small bites versus large bites: a randomized comparative trial","volume":"7","author":"Sharma R","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sharma R, Kaur A. Abdominal midline wound closure with small bites versus large bites: a randomized comparative trial. Int Surg J. 2020, 7:1391-6. 10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20201529","journal-title":"Int Surg J"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12262-018-1776-6","article-title":"Editorial: Ten commandments of safe and optimum abdominal wall closure","volume":"80","author":"Chintamani","year":"2018","unstructured":"Chintamani. Editorial: Ten commandments of safe and optimum abdominal wall closure. Indian J Surg. 2018, 80:105-8. 10.1007\/s12262-018-1776-6","journal-title":"Indian J Surg"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20173887","article-title":"Comparison of conventional closure versus \u201cre-modified Smead Jones\u201d technique of single layer mass closure with polypropylene (Prolene) loop suture after midline laparotomy in emergency cases","volume":"24","author":"Sringeri R","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sringeri R, Vasudeviah T. Comparison of conventional closure versus \u201cre-modified Smead Jones\u201d technique of single layer mass closure with polypropylene (Prolene) loop suture after midline laparotomy in emergency cases. Int Surg J. 2017, 24:3058. 10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20173887","journal-title":"Int Surg J"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800700514","article-title":"Incisional hernias: when do they occur?","volume":"70","author":"Ellis H","year":"1983","unstructured":"Ellis H, Gajraj H, George CD. Incisional hernias: when do they occur?. Br J Surg. 1983, 70:290-1. 10.1002\/bjs.1800700514","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0039-6109(16)42031-1","article-title":"The epidemiology of wound infection: a 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds","volume":"60","author":"Cruse PJE","year":"1980","unstructured":"Cruse PJE, Ford R. The epidemiology of wound infection: a 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am. 1980, 60:27. 10.1016\/s0039-6109(16)42031-1","journal-title":"Surg Clin North Am"},{"key":"ref8","article-title":"Primary mass closure of midline incisions with a continuous running monofilament suture in gynecologic patients","volume":"73","author":"Gallup DG","year":"1989","unstructured":"Gallup DG, Talledo OE, King LA. Primary mass closure of midline incisions with a continuous running monofilament suture in gynecologic patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1989, 73:675-7.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(73)90673-x","article-title":"Abdominal hysterectomy: relationship between morbidity and surgical technique","volume":"145","author":"Richardson AC","year":"1973","unstructured":"Richardson AC, Lyon JB, Grahm EE. Abdominal hysterectomy: relationship between morbidity and surgical technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973, 145:514. 10.1016\/0002-9378(73)90673-x","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.1977.01370100042008","article-title":"Principles of abdominal wound closure. II. Prevention of wound dehiscence","volume":"112","author":"Sanders RJ","year":"1977","unstructured":"Sanders RJ, DiClementi D. Principles of abdominal wound closure. II. Prevention of wound dehiscence. Arch Surg. 1977, 112:1188-91. 10.1001\/archsurg.1977.01370100042008","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"ref11","article-title":"Abdominal wound dehiscence. A 10-year survey from a district general hospital","volume":"59","author":"White H","year":"1977","unstructured":"White H, Cook J, Ward M. Abdominal wound dehiscence. A 10-year survey from a district general hospital. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1977, 59:337-41.","journal-title":"Ann R Coll Surg Engl"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12262-012-0611-8","article-title":"Interrupted abdominal closure prevents burst: randomized controlled trial comparing interrupted-x and conventional continuous closures in surgical and gynecological patients","volume":"76","author":"Agrawal CS","year":"2014","unstructured":"Agrawal CS, Tiwari P, Mishra S, Rao A, Hadke NS, Adhikari S, Srivastava A. Interrupted abdominal closure prevents burst: randomized controlled trial comparing interrupted-x and conventional continuous closures in surgical and gynecological patients. Indian J Surg. 2014, 76:270-6. 10.1007\/s12262-012-0611-8","journal-title":"Indian J Surg"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-193810000-00018","article-title":"The repair of abdominal incisions","volume":"108","author":"Whipple AO","year":"1938","unstructured":"Whipple AO, Elliott RH. The repair of abdominal incisions. Ann Surg. 1938, 108:741-56. 10.1097\/00000658-193810000-00018","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.45655","article-title":"A clinical comparative study of rectus sheath closure techniques in emergency exploratory laparotomy: evaluating \"Far-near-near-far\" vs. Conventional closure approach","volume":"15","author":"Garg S","year":"2023","unstructured":"Garg S, Yadav MS, Singhal K. A clinical comparative study of rectus sheath closure techniques in emergency exploratory laparotomy: evaluating \"Far-near-near-far\" vs. Conventional closure approach. Cureus. 2023, 15:e45655. 10.7759\/cureus.45655","journal-title":"Cureus"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/309733-assessment-of-postoperative-complications-between-interrupted-modified-smead-jones-rectus-closure-and-conventional-rectus-closure-in-midline-laparotomy-wounds-a-comparative-study","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,30]],"date-time":"2024-10-30T16:42:53Z","timestamp":1730306573000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/309733-assessment-of-postoperative-complications-between-interrupted-modified-smead-jones-rectus-closure-and-conventional-rectus-closure-in-midline-laparotomy-wounds-a-comparative-study"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,30]]},"references-count":14,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.72712","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,30]]}}}