{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,21]],"date-time":"2026-09-21T19:39:17Z","timestamp":1790019557004,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,26]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.76406","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,26]],"date-time":"2024-12-26T11:04:54Z","timestamp":1735211094000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Risk Factors for Positive Resection Margins Following Breast-Conserving Surgery"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Gabriella","family":"Truda","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sarah","family":"Howells","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Madeleine","family":"Berry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nour","family":"Al-Shurbasi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","unstructured":"Breast cancer statistics | Cancer Research UK. (2024). Accessed. December 10, 2024: https:\/\/www.cancerresearchuk.org\/health-professional\/cancer-statistics\/statistics-by-cancer-type\/breast-cancer."},{"key":"ref2","unstructured":"Overview | Early and locally advanced breast cancer. diagnosis and management | Guidance | NICE. (2024). Accessed: December 10, 2024: https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng101."},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijrobp.2013.11.012","article-title":"Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer","volume":"88","author":"Moran MS","year":"2014","unstructured":"Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al.. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014, 88:553-64. 10.1016\/j.ijrobp.2013.11.012","journal-title":"Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-016-5449-z","article-title":"Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ","volume":"23","author":"Morrow M","year":"2016","unstructured":"Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, et al.. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016, 23:3801-10. 10.1245\/s10434-016-5449-z","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.19.03213","article-title":"Lumpectomy margins for invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ: current guideline recommendations, their implications, and impact","volume":"38","author":"Schnitt SJ","year":"2020","unstructured":"Schnitt SJ, Moran MS, Giuliano AE. Lumpectomy margins for invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ: current guideline recommendations, their implications, and impact. J Clin Oncol. 2020, 38:2240-5. 10.1200\/JCO.19.03213","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2017.07.032","article-title":"Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland","volume":"84","author":"Tang SS","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tang SS, Kaptanis S, Haddow JB, et al.. Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland. Eur J Cancer. 2017, 84:315-24. 10.1016\/j.ejca.2017.07.032","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.14467","article-title":"Factors influencing reoperation following breast-conserving surgery","volume":"88","author":"Philpott A","year":"2018","unstructured":"Philpott A, Wong J, Elder K, Gorelik A, Mann GB, Skandarajah A. Factors influencing reoperation following breast-conserving surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2018, 88:922-7. 10.1111\/ans.14467","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e4505","article-title":"Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics","volume":"345","author":"Jeevan R","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Trivella M, et al.. Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ. 2012, 345:e4505. 10.1136\/bmj.e4505","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2014.08.011","article-title":"Re-resection rates and risk characteristics following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer and carcinoma in situ: a single-centre study of 1575 consecutive cases","volume":"23","author":"Kryh CG","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kryh CG, Pietersen CA, Rahr HB, Christensen RD, Wamberg P, Lautrup MD. Re-resection rates and risk characteristics following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer and carcinoma in situ: a single-centre study of 1575 consecutive cases. Breast. 2014, 23:784-9. 10.1016\/j.breast.2014.08.011","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.4751","article-title":"Reoperation rates in ductal carcinoma in situ vs invasive breast cancer after wire-guided breast-conserving surgery","volume":"152","author":"Langhans L","year":"2017","unstructured":"Langhans L, Jensen MB, Talman MM, Vejborg I, Kroman N, Tvedskov TF. Reoperation rates in ductal carcinoma in situ vs invasive breast cancer after wire-guided breast-conserving surgery. JAMA Surg. 2017, 152:378-84. 10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.4751","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr3292","article-title":"Imaging features of noncalcified DCIS","volume":"14","author":"Scudder J","year":"2012","unstructured":"Scudder J, Parikh J. Imaging features of noncalcified DCIS. Breast Cancer Res. 2012, 14:P37. 10.1186\/bcr3292","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2020.02.011","article-title":"Noncalcified Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): rate and predictors of upgrade to invasive carcinoma","volume":"28","author":"Lamb LR","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lamb LR, Kim G, Oseni TO, Bahl M. Noncalcified Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): rate and predictors of upgrade to invasive carcinoma. Acad Radiol. 2021, 28:e71-6. 10.1016\/j.acra.2020.02.011","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"ref13","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in predicting breast tumor size: comparative analysis of MRI vs histopathological assessed breast tumor size","volume":"79","author":"Jethava A","year":"2015","unstructured":"Jethava A, Ali S, Wakefield D, Crowell R, Sporn J, Vrendenburgh J. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in predicting breast tumor size: comparative analysis of MRI vs histopathological assessed breast tumor size. Conn Med. 2015, 79:261-7.","journal-title":"Conn Med"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2020.3025","article-title":"Changes in reoperation after publication of consensus guidelines on margins for breast-conserving surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"155","author":"Marinovich ML","year":"2020","unstructured":"Marinovich ML, Noguchi N, Morrow M, Houssami N. Changes in reoperation after publication of consensus guidelines on margins for breast-conserving surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2020, 155:e203025. 10.1001\/jamasurg.2020.3025","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.14.12743","article-title":"Radioactive seed localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: a comparison of outcomes","volume":"204","author":"Sharek D","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sharek D, Zuley ML, Zhang JY, Soran A, Ahrendt GM, Ganott MA. Radioactive seed localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: a comparison of outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015, 204:872-7. 10.2214\/AJR.14.12743","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21873\/anticanres.14135","article-title":"Evolving role of magseed in wireless localization of breast lesions: systematic review and pooled analysis of 1,559 procedures","volume":"40","author":"Gera R","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gera R, Tayeh S, Al-Reefy S, Mokbel K. Evolving role of magseed in wireless localization of breast lesions: systematic review and pooled analysis of 1,559 procedures. Anticancer Res. 2020, 40:1809-15. 10.21873\/anticanres.14135","journal-title":"Anticancer Res"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21873\/anticanres.13955","article-title":"The use of magnetic seeds and radiofrequency identifier tags in breast surgery for non-palpable lesions","volume":"40","author":"Tayeh S","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tayeh S, Gera R, Perry N, Michell M, Malhotra A, Mokbel K. The use of magnetic seeds and radiofrequency identifier tags in breast surgery for non-palpable lesions. Anticancer Res. 2020, 40:315-21. 10.21873\/anticanres.13955","journal-title":"Anticancer Res"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers13194996","article-title":"The evolving role of radiofrequency guided localisation in breast surgery: a systematic review","volume":"13","author":"Tayeh S","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tayeh S, Wazir U, Mokbel K. The evolving role of radiofrequency guided localisation in breast surgery: a systematic review. Cancers (Basel). 2021, 13:10.3390\/cancers13194996","journal-title":"Cancers (Basel)"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-019-05355-0","article-title":"Radiofrequency identification tag localization is comparable to wire localization for non-palpable breast lesions","volume":"177","author":"McGugin C","year":"2019","unstructured":"McGugin C, Spivey T, Coopey S, et al.. Radiofrequency identification tag localization is comparable to wire localization for non-palpable breast lesions. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019, 177:735-9. 10.1007\/s10549-019-05355-0","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20170268","article-title":"Radioactive seed localization compared with wire-guided localization of non-palpable breast carcinoma in breast conservation surgery- the first experience in the United Kingdom","volume":"91","author":"Milligan R","year":"2018","unstructured":"Milligan R, Pieri A, Critchley A, et al.. Radioactive seed localization compared with wire-guided localization of non-palpable breast carcinoma in breast conservation surgery- the first experience in the United Kingdom. Br J Radiol. 2018, 91:20170268. 10.1259\/bjr.20170268","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/189264-risk-factors-for-positive-resection-margins-following-breast-conserving-surgery","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,26]],"date-time":"2024-12-26T11:05:00Z","timestamp":1735211100000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/189264-risk-factors-for-positive-resection-margins-following-breast-conserving-surgery"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,26]]},"references-count":20,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.76406","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,26]]}}}