{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,31]],"date-time":"2025-01-31T05:19:00Z","timestamp":1738300740784,"version":"3.35.0"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,30]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.78246","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,30]],"date-time":"2025-01-30T19:12:51Z","timestamp":1738264371000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Spinal Anesthesia for Ambulatory Surgery Using Hyperbaric Prilocaine vs Hyperbaric Bupivacaine: A Prospective Study"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Nelson","family":"Gomes","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ana","family":"Castro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sandra","family":"Borges","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Paula","family":"Sarmento","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s44158-023-00122-6","article-title":"Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: A retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients","volume":"3","author":"Ambrosoli AL","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ambrosoli AL, Di Carlo S, Crespi A, et al.. Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: A retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients. J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2023, 3:40. 10.1186\/s44158-023-00122-6","journal-title":"J Anesth Analg Crit Care"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.20471\/acc.2022.61.s2.22","article-title":"Spinal anesthesia in day surgery - Early experiences","volume":"61","author":"Turkovi\u0107 TM","year":"2022","unstructured":"Turkovi\u0107 TM, Sabo G, Babi\u0107 S, \u0160o\u0161tari\u0107 S. Spinal anesthesia in day surgery - Early experiences. Acta clinica Croatica. 2022, 61:10.20471\/acc.2022.61.s2.22","journal-title":"Acta clinica Croatica"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ACO.0000000000000924","article-title":"Spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgery: current controversies and concerns","volume":"33","author":"Stewart J","year":"2020","unstructured":"Stewart J, Gasanova I, Joshi GP. Spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgery: current controversies and concerns. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020, 33:746-52. 10.1097\/ACO.0000000000000924","journal-title":"Curr Opin Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjae.2019.06.001","article-title":"Spinal anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery","volume":"19","author":"Rattenberry W","year":"2019","unstructured":"Rattenberry W, Hertling A, Erskine R. Spinal anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery. BJA Educ. 2019, 19:321-8. 10.1016\/j.bjae.2019.06.001","journal-title":"BJA Educ"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.6859\/aja.202106_59(2).0001","article-title":"Recent updates in spinal anesthesia-A narrative review","volume":"59","author":"Vadhanan P","year":"2021","unstructured":"Vadhanan P. Recent updates in spinal anesthesia-A narrative review. Asian J Anesthesiol. 2021, 59:10. 10.6859\/aja.202106_59(2).0001","journal-title":"Asian J Anesthesiol"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/rapm-2019-100673","article-title":"Chloroprocaine versus prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in ambulatory knee arthroscopy: A double-blind randomized trial","volume":"44","author":"Wesselink E","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wesselink E, Hurk GJ, Vegt RV, et al.. Chloroprocaine versus prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in ambulatory knee arthroscopy: A double-blind randomized trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019, 44:944-949. 10.1136\/rapm-2019-100673","journal-title":"Reg Anesth Pain Med"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12325-019-01171-6","article-title":"Factors determining the choice of spinal versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery: Results of a multicenter observational study","volume":"37","author":"Capdevila X","year":"2020","unstructured":"Capdevila X, Aveline C, Delaunay L, et al.. Factors determining the choice of spinal versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery: Results of a multicenter observational study. Adv Ther. 2020, 37:527-40. 10.1007\/s12325-019-01171-6","journal-title":"Adv Ther"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.13361","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of intrathecal blockade versus peripheral nerve blockade for day-case knee arthroscopy","volume":"71","author":"Ambrosoli AL","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ambrosoli AL, Chiaranda M, Fedele LL, Gemma M, Cedrati V, Cappelleri G. A randomised controlled trial of intrathecal blockade versus peripheral nerve blockade for day-case knee arthroscopy. Anaesthesia. 2016, 71:280-4. 10.1111\/anae.13361","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/EJA.0000000000001548","article-title":"Comparison of equipotent doses of intrathecal hyperbaric prilocaine 2% and hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% for elective caesarean section: A prospective, randomised, controlled, two-centre clinical trial","volume":"39","author":"Goffard P","year":"2022","unstructured":"Goffard P, Leloup R, Vercruysse Y, Fils JF, Gautier PE, Kapessidou Y. Comparison of equipotent doses of intrathecal hyperbaric prilocaine 2% and hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% for elective caesarean section: A prospective, randomised, controlled, two-centre clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022, 39:227-35. 10.1097\/EJA.0000000000001548","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-018-5327-2","article-title":"Using chloroprocaine for spinal anaesthesia in outpatient knee-arthroscopy results in earlier discharge and improved operating room efficiency compared to mepivacaine and prilocaine","volume":"27","author":"Gebhardt V","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gebhardt V, Hausen S, Weiss C, Schmittner MD. Using chloroprocaine for spinal anaesthesia in outpatient knee-arthroscopy results in earlier discharge and improved operating room efficiency compared to mepivacaine and prilocaine. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019, 27:3032-40. 10.1007\/s00167-018-5327-2","journal-title":"Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-015-0445-5","article-title":"Intrathecal hyperbaric 2% prilocaine versus 0.4% plain ropivacaine for same-day arthroscopic knee surgery: A prospective randomized double-blind controlled study","volume":"62","author":"Aguirre J","year":"2015","unstructured":"Aguirre J, Borgeat A, B\u00fchler P, Mrdjen J, Hardmeier B, Bonvini JM. Intrathecal hyperbaric 2% prilocaine versus 0.4% plain ropivacaine for same-day arthroscopic knee surgery: A prospective randomized double-blind controlled study. Can J Anaesth. 2015, 62:1055-62. 10.1007\/s12630-015-0445-5","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0b013e3181e30bb8","article-title":"A prospective, double-blinded, randomized, clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 40 mg and 60 mg hyperbaric 2% prilocaine versus 60 mg plain 2% prilocaine for intrathecal anesthesia in ambulatory surgery","volume":"111","author":"Camponovo C","year":"2010","unstructured":"Camponovo C, Fanelli A, Ghisi D, Cristina D, Fanelli G. A prospective, double-blinded, randomized, clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 40 mg and 60 mg hyperbaric 2% prilocaine versus 60 mg plain 2% prilocaine for intrathecal anesthesia in ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 2010, 111:568-72. 10.1213\/ANE.0b013e3181e30bb8","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200208000-00005","article-title":"Ambulatory surgery patients may be discharged before voiding after short-acting spinal and epidural anesthesia","volume":"97","author":"Mulroy MF","year":"2002","unstructured":"Mulroy MF, Salinas FV, Larkin KL, Polissar NL. Ambulatory surgery patients may be discharged before voiding after short-acting spinal and epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2002, 97:315-9. 10.1097\/00000542-200208000-00005","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2007.12.064","article-title":"Factors associated with delayed postsurgical voiding interval in ambulatory spinal anesthesia patients: A prospective cohort study in 3 types of surgery","volume":"197","author":"Linares Gil MJ","year":"2009","unstructured":"Linares Gil MJ, Esteve G\u00f3mez A, Blanco Vargas D, et al.. Factors associated with delayed postsurgical voiding interval in ambulatory spinal anesthesia patients: A prospective cohort study in 3 types of surgery. Am J Surg. 2009, 197:182-8. 10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2007.12.064","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.49886","article-title":"Risk factors in administering spinal anesthesia: A comprehensive review","volume":"15","author":"Doelakeh ES","year":"2023","unstructured":"Doelakeh ES, Chandak A. Risk factors in administering spinal anesthesia: A comprehensive review. Cureus. 2023, 15:e49886. 10.7759\/cureus.49886","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s40634-021-00332-3","article-title":"Intrathecal chloroprocaine or hyperbaric prilocaine for ambulatory knee surgery? A prospective randomized study","volume":"8","author":"Guntz E","year":"2021","unstructured":"Guntz E, Vasseur C, Ifrim D, Louvard A, Fils JF, Kapessidou Y. Intrathecal chloroprocaine or hyperbaric prilocaine for ambulatory knee surgery? A prospective randomized study. J Exp Orthop. 2021, 8:15. 10.1186\/s40634-021-00332-3","journal-title":"J Exp Orthop"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aeq054","article-title":"Urinary retention after spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric prilocaine 2% in an ambulatory setting","volume":"104","author":"Kreutziger J","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kreutziger J, Frankenberger B, Luger TJ, Richard S, Zbinden S. Urinary retention after spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric prilocaine 2% in an ambulatory setting. Br J Anaesth. 2010, 104:582-6. 10.1093\/bja\/aeq054","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/608372","article-title":"Spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric prilocaine in day-case perianal surgery: Randomised controlled trial","volume":"2014","author":"Kaban OG","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kaban OG, Yazicioglu D, Akkaya T, Sayin MM, Seker D, Gumus H. Spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric prilocaine in day-case perianal surgery: Randomised controlled trial. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014, 2014:608372. 10.1155\/2014\/608372","journal-title":"ScientificWorldJournal"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2478\/s11536-013-0336-5","article-title":"Spinal hyperbaric prilocaine vs. mepivacaine in perianal outpatient surgery","volume":"9","author":"Gebhardt V","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gebhardt V, Beilstein B, Herold A, Weiss C, Fanelli G, Dusch M, Schmittner M. Spinal hyperbaric prilocaine vs. mepivacaine in perianal outpatient surgery. Open Medicine. 2014, 9:754-61. 10.2478\/s11536-013-0336-5","journal-title":"Open Medicine"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/251718-spinal-anesthesia-for-ambulatory-surgery-using-hyperbaric-prilocaine-vs-hyperbaric-bupivacaine-a-prospective-study","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,30]],"date-time":"2025-01-30T19:12:54Z","timestamp":1738264374000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/251718-spinal-anesthesia-for-ambulatory-surgery-using-hyperbaric-prilocaine-vs-hyperbaric-bupivacaine-a-prospective-study"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,30]]},"references-count":19,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.78246","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,30]]}}}